【摘要】：漢語文體中的說明文、議論文、記敘文是日常閱讀和各類考試中最常見的文體形式,分別具有解釋說明事物事理,發(fā)表作者觀點(diǎn)以及敘事達(dá)情的作用,掌握這三種文體篇章對于個(gè)人發(fā)展具有重要意義。此次研究通過對藏、漢族大學(xué)生在這三種文體上的閱讀眼動(dòng)研究,探討藏、漢大學(xué)生閱讀眼動(dòng)模式之間的不同,對于豐富我國的眼動(dòng)研究,建立本土化的眼動(dòng)控制模型具有重大作用。研究采用分層隨機(jī)抽樣方法選取青海師范大學(xué)四個(gè)年級的民考民學(xué)生24名,漢族四個(gè)年級的學(xué)生24名學(xué)生為實(shí)驗(yàn)被試。實(shí)驗(yàn)材料均經(jīng)過語文教師評定為難度適中的三種漢語文體材料各兩篇。實(shí)驗(yàn)使用SMI眼動(dòng)儀、采用拉丁方設(shè)計(jì)以研究探討藏、漢大學(xué)生閱讀三種文體時(shí)眼動(dòng)差異,得出結(jié)論如下:1.六個(gè)指標(biāo)上都表明藏、漢大學(xué)生差異顯著。2.從閱讀成績上看,藏、漢大學(xué)生都表現(xiàn)為記敘文最好,議論文最差,且各年級間穩(wěn)定。3.從閱讀時(shí)間上看,藏族大學(xué)生議論文閱讀最快,說明文最慢,且處于穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。漢族大學(xué)生記敘文最快,說明文最慢,且大二年級表現(xiàn)最好。4.從注視次數(shù)上看,藏族大學(xué)生議論文最少,說明文最多。漢族大學(xué)生說明文最多,記敘文最少。都處于穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。5.從眼跳幅度上看,藏、漢大學(xué)生在三種文體上沒有差異,但共同表明大二年級狀態(tài)最佳。6.從注視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間上看,藏、漢大學(xué)生在三種文體上沒有差異,且處于穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。7.從瞳孔直徑上看,藏族大學(xué)生在三種文體上差異不顯著,但直徑在逐步增大。漢族大學(xué)生在議論文上最小,說明文上最大,且處于穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。
[Abstract]:Narrative, argumentation and narration in Chinese style are the most common stylistic forms in daily reading and all kinds of examinations. They have the function of explaining things, expressing author's views and narrating emotion, respectively. Mastering these three texts is of great significance to personal development. Through the study of reading eye movements of Tibetan and Han Chinese college students in these three styles, this study explores the differences between the reading eye movement patterns of Tibetan and Han college students and enriches the study of eye movement in China. It is very important to establish a local eye movement control model. A stratified random sampling method was used to select 24 students from four grades of Qinghai normal University and 24 students from four grades of Han nationality. The experimental materials were assessed by Chinese teachers as two Chinese stylistic materials with moderate difficulty. The experiment used SMI eye movement instrument and Latin square design to study the differences of eye movement between Tibetan and Chinese college students when reading three styles. The conclusions are as follows: 1. Six indicators show that Tibetan, Han college students are significantly different. 2. From the reading score, Tibetan, Han students are the best narrative, the worst argumentative, and the stability of each grade. 3. From the point of view of reading time, Tibetan university students read the fastest argumentative papers, the slowest narrative, and are in a stable state. Han Chinese students narrative the fastest, the slowest, and sophomore best performance. 4. From the point of view of the frequency of gaze, Tibetan college students have the least argumentation and the most written texts. Han university students have the most written texts and the least narratives. Are in a stable state. 5. From the range of eye jump, Tibetan, Han Chinese students in the three styles are not different, but together show that sophomore grade state is the best. 6. 6. From the point of view of the duration of fixation, Tibetan, Han Chinese students in the three styles of no difference, and is in a stable state. 7. 7. In terms of pupil diameter, Tibetan college students have no significant difference in three styles, but the diameter is gradually increasing. The Han university students are the smallest in argumentation, the largest in the written text, and in a stable state.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H193

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白學(xué)軍;王永勝;郭志英;高曉雷;閆國利;;漢語閱讀中詞N+2的預(yù)視對高頻詞N+1加工影響的眼動(dòng)研究[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

2 劉明巖;;給予幼兒充分自主閱讀的時(shí)間和空間[J];福建教育;2014年50期

3 閆國利;遲慧;崔磊;夏螢;許曉露;白學(xué)軍;;漢字筆畫像素?cái)?shù)省略對中文句子閱讀影響的眼動(dòng)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2014年03期

4 閆國利;孫莎莎;張巧明;白學(xué)軍;;自然閱讀與校對閱讀的知覺廣度研究[J];心理科學(xué);2014年02期

5 慕德芳;宋耀武;高江峰;;無關(guān)言語對漢字短時(shí)記憶系列回憶的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

6 閆國利;熊建萍;臧傳麗;余莉莉;崔磊;白學(xué)軍;;閱讀研究中的主要眼動(dòng)指標(biāo)評述[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年04期

7 閆國利;遲慧;卞遷;徐子s，

本文編號：2314687