本文選題：說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句 + 語(yǔ)體　； 參考：《湖南科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句是因果類(lèi)復(fù)句下位的一個(gè)小類(lèi),是漢語(yǔ)復(fù)句系統(tǒng)里非常重要的一類(lèi)復(fù)句。目前為止,學(xué)界對(duì)因果復(fù)句的研究較為全面,但對(duì)其下小類(lèi)的研究成果較少�；诖�,本文嘗試分語(yǔ)體對(duì)漢語(yǔ)有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句進(jìn)行考察,為因果復(fù)句的研究提供些許依據(jù)。本文主要從關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記、語(yǔ)體、歷時(shí)變化三個(gè)視角對(duì)漢語(yǔ)有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句進(jìn)行考察。從因句和果句的語(yǔ)序來(lái)看,“因-果”式復(fù)句是有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句的優(yōu)勢(shì)句式,但“果-因”式復(fù)句的使用頻率也不低,這兩種句式類(lèi)型的存在,我們都可以用認(rèn)知規(guī)律的象似性原理來(lái)解釋;從關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記的數(shù)量來(lái)看,單標(biāo)式復(fù)句在有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句中占主體地位,雙標(biāo)式復(fù)句次之,多標(biāo)式復(fù)句的使用頻率極低,這說(shuō)明人們?cè)诒磉_(dá)時(shí)遵循語(yǔ)用的經(jīng)濟(jì)性原則;從關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記模式來(lái)看,居中粘接式在有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句中占優(yōu)勢(shì),其次是居端依賴(lài)式,最后是前后配套式,這符合“聯(lián)系項(xiàng)居中原則”,而深層原因是受象似性原理和經(jīng)濟(jì)性原則的雙重影響。從語(yǔ)體的角度來(lái)看,各語(yǔ)體中都是單標(biāo)式復(fù)句、居中粘接式復(fù)句、“因-果”式復(fù)句占優(yōu)勢(shì),但各種說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句在四種語(yǔ)體中的分布也存在一定的差異:科技語(yǔ)體擅長(zhǎng)邏輯推理,其“因-果”式、配套多標(biāo)式使用最高;新聞?wù)Z體傳播新聞事實(shí),其居端依賴(lài)式與居中粘接式的使用頻率相當(dāng);文學(xué)語(yǔ)體包容度高,對(duì)于各句式的選擇最靈活;口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)體用于口耳相傳,其單標(biāo)式、居中粘接式、“果-因”式表達(dá)使用頻率最高,這表明語(yǔ)體對(duì)語(yǔ)言有一定的制約作用。從歷史變化的角度看,漢語(yǔ)因果復(fù)句在歷史的演變中,關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記間的配合愈來(lái)愈靈活,句式愈來(lái)愈多,體系愈來(lái)愈龐大;漢語(yǔ)的內(nèi)在自我調(diào)節(jié)使得因果關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記越來(lái)越趨于口語(yǔ)化、雙音節(jié)化;而因?yàn)槿祟?lèi)的認(rèn)知惰性,居中粘接式復(fù)句一直占優(yōu)勢(shì);同時(shí)我們發(fā)現(xiàn),漢語(yǔ)有標(biāo)說(shuō)明性因果復(fù)句的關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記具有一定的替代性,從古沿用至今的復(fù)句句式很少。
[Abstract]:Declarative causality complex sentence is a subclass of causal complex sentence, and it is a very important complex sentence in Chinese complex sentence system. So far, the academic research on causality complex sentence is more comprehensive, but the research results of its subcategory are less. Based on this, this paper attempts to investigate the marked declarative causality complex sentence in Chinese in different languages, which provides some basis for the study of causality complex sentence. In this paper, we study the Chinese marked causality complex from the perspective of relevance marker, style and diachronic change. In terms of the word order of reason sentence and fruit sentence, "in- effect" complex sentence is the dominant sentence pattern of illustrative causality complex sentence, but the use frequency of "Guo-cause" complex sentence is not low, the existence of these two kinds of sentence types, We can all use the iconicity principle of cognitive law to explain. From the number of correlation markers, the single marker complex sentence occupies the main position in the marked illustrative causality complex sentence, the double label complex sentence takes the second place, and the multi-label complex sentence is used very low frequency. This shows that people follow the economic principle of pragmatics in their expression. From the perspective of the model of relevance markers, the central adhesive is dominant in the marked illustrative causality complex, followed by the residential dependency, and finally the supporting form. This is in line with the principle of intermediation of the associative term, and the deep reason is influenced by the principle of iconicity and the principle of economy. From a stylistic point of view, each style is characterized by single-label complex sentences, intermediate adhesive complex sentences, and "in-effect" complex sentences. However, there are some differences in the distribution of various illustrative causality complex sentences in the four styles: the scientific and technological style is good at logical reasoning, its "cause-effect" style is the highest, and the news style spreads news facts. It has the same frequency of use as the center-dependent type and the centre-bonding type; the literary style has a high tolerance and is the most flexible for the choice of each sentence pattern; the oral style is used in oral transmission, with its single-standard, intermediate adhesive, The expression of "fruit-cause" is the most frequently used, which indicates that language style has a certain restriction on language. From the perspective of historical changes, in the historical evolution of Chinese causality complex sentences, the coordination between the related markers is more and more flexible, the sentence patterns are more and more, and the system is becoming larger and larger. The internal self-regulation of Chinese makes cause-related markers more and more colloquial and disyllabic, and because of the cognitive inertia of human beings, the intermediate cohesive complex sentences have always been dominant. At the same time, we have found that, The correlation markers of Chinese marked illustrative causality complex sentences have a certain substitution, and few complex sentence patterns have been used since ancient times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H146.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李晉霞;王忠玲;;論“因?yàn)椤薄八浴眴斡脮r(shí)的選擇傾向與使用差異[J];語(yǔ)言研究;2013年01期

2 馮勝利;;語(yǔ)體語(yǔ)法及其文學(xué)功能[J];當(dāng)代修辭學(xué);2011年04期

3 姚雙云;;口語(yǔ)中“所以”的語(yǔ)義弱化與功能擴(kuò)展[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

4 陳默;;“所以”語(yǔ)法化初探[J];綿陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年07期

5 謝曉明;左雙菊;;“難怪”的語(yǔ)法化[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2009年02期

6 李小軍;;“從而”、“因而”的功能差異及其歷時(shí)解釋[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2009年01期

7 劉云;;復(fù)句關(guān)系詞語(yǔ)離析度考察[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;2008年06期

8 儲(chǔ)澤祥;陶伏平;;漢語(yǔ)因果復(fù)句的關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記模式與“聯(lián)系項(xiàng)居中原則”[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;2008年05期

9 郭繼懋;;“因?yàn)樗浴本浜汀凹热荒敲础本涞牟町怺J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2008年03期

10 陶紅印;;操作語(yǔ)體中動(dòng)詞論元結(jié)構(gòu)的實(shí)現(xiàn)及語(yǔ)用原則[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 肖任飛;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)因果復(fù)句優(yōu)先序列研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

2 丁志叢;漢語(yǔ)有標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)折復(fù)句的關(guān)聯(lián)標(biāo)記模式及使用情況考察[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 汪蓓蓓;表因類(lèi)因果連詞“因?yàn)椤薄坝捎凇薄凹热弧钡亩ㄎ豢蚣芗胺椒ㄕ撘饬x[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

2 韓曉云;《太平經(jīng)》因果類(lèi)復(fù)句研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2015年

3 鄭郁汀;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)因果復(fù)句焦點(diǎn)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

4 李楠楠;《紅樓夢(mèng)》因果類(lèi)復(fù)句研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

5 劉暢;表因果關(guān)系的關(guān)聯(lián)詞語(yǔ)研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

6 倪重陽(yáng);現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)因果連詞研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

7 蘇振華;《國(guó)語(yǔ)》因果類(lèi)復(fù)句研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2007年

8 黎氏秋Y，

本文編號(hào)：2022007