本文選題：《墨子》 + 排比��； 參考：《揚州大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《墨子》中排比運用形式多樣,內(nèi)容豐富。本文以《墨子》排比運用為研究點,收集《墨子》中全部排比運用的語料,進行全面細致的分析,系統(tǒng)地梳理《墨子》排比運用的的特點。本文一共分為四個部分。首先是緒論,主要介紹本文研究主題的研究現(xiàn)狀,以及對排比辭格的界定。第一章介紹《墨子》的排比類型。按照前人對排比類型的分類,本文將排比分為短語、句子和段落的排比。其中依據(jù)短語充當句法成分的作用,將短句排比又細分為充當主語、謂語、賓語和定語的排比。句子排比又可細分為單句排比和復句排比。根據(jù)單句謂語的詞性特點將單句排比分為動詞性謂語句排比、形容詞性謂語句排比和名詞性謂語句排比。根據(jù)主句和從句之間的邏輯關(guān)系,將復句排比細分為并列復句排比、因果復句排比、假設(shè)復句排比、轉(zhuǎn)折復句排比等�！赌印分信疟绒o格運用廣泛,其排比辭格往往不會單獨運用,而是與其他辭格綜合運用,主要是與層遞、反復、設(shè)問、頂真及對比等辭格的綜合運用。所以,第二章從排比與其他辭格綜合運用的角度,進一步探討《墨子》排比運用的特點。第一部分從排比與層遞的綜合運用,分析《墨子》排比運用重視語言表述的邏輯性特點。第二部分從排比的連用,與頂真辭格的綜合運用,分析《墨子》排比運用重視語言表述的連貫性特點。第三部分從排比與設(shè)問、反復、對比等辭格的綜合運用,分析《墨子》排比運用重視語言表述的突顯性特點。第三章比較《墨子》排比和《孟子》排比運用的特點,突出《墨子》排比運用的特點。第三章分為三個部分,第一部分在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,進一步探析《孟子》的排比特點。第二部分對二者排比運用作具體分析,首先是相同點,二者語言均選取通俗易懂的語言進行說理,與比喻結(jié)合使得語言生動有趣。不同點有兩方面,《墨子》排比多復句排比和段落排比,說理清晰嚴密�！睹献印放疟葎t多使用短句,生動活潑。最后,在情感抒發(fā)方面,《墨子》排比語言冷靜客觀,《孟子》則顯得情感充沛。
[Abstract]:Mozi in the use of various forms, rich content. This paper takes "Mozi" as the research point, collects all the data of the use of the ranking ratio in the "Mozi", makes a comprehensive and detailed analysis, and systematically combs the characteristics of the use of the "Mozi" ranking ratio. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is the introduction, which mainly introduces the research status of the subject of this paper, and the definition of the comparative rhetoric. The first chapter introduces the ranking type of Mozi. According to the previous classification of scale types, this paper classifies the ratio into phrase, sentence and paragraph. According to the function of phrase as syntactic component, the short sentence ratio is subdivided into the proportion of subject, predicate, object and attribute. Sentence ratio can be subdivided into single sentence ratio and complex sentence ratio. According to the characteristics of single sentence predicate, the simple sentence ratio is divided into verb predicate, adjective predicate and noun predicate. According to the logical relationship between the main sentence and the clause, the ranking ratio of complex sentence is subdivided into parallel complex sentence, causal complex sentence, hypothetical complex sentence, turning complex sentence, etc. < Mozi > is widely used. It is often not used alone, but with other words and cases, mainly with hierarchical, repeated, ask, top truth and comparison of the comprehensive use of words. Therefore, the second chapter further discusses the characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the perspective of comprehensive use of ranking ratio and other figures of speech. The first part analyzes the logical characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the comprehensive application of ratio and stratification. In the second part, the author analyzes the coherence characteristics of the use of "Mozi" from the use of the parallelism and the comprehensive use of the top true words. The third part analyzes the salient features of "Mozi" which attaches importance to language expression from the comprehensive application of comparison and question, repetition, contrast and so on. The third chapter compares the characteristics of the comparison between Mozi and Mencius. The third chapter is divided into three parts. The first part analyzes the characteristics of Mencius' ranking on the basis of previous studies. In the second part, the author makes a concrete analysis of the application of the two ranking ratio. Firstly, the two languages choose the common language to reason, and the combination of metaphor and metaphor makes the language lively and interesting. There are two differences: Mozi, multiple sentences and paragraphs, the reasoning is clear and strict, but the < Mencius > ratio uses short sentences and is lively. Finally, in the aspect of emotional expression, Mozi's comparison language is calm and objective, and Mencius is full of emotion.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H141

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張藝嬌;;先秦時期的設(shè)問辭格及其審美價值[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年04期

2 查德華;;突顯觀與模因論在城市形象主題口號中的應(yīng)用[J];浙江萬里學院學報;2011年06期

3 劉瑞琴;;設(shè)問辭格的修辭特征和藝術(shù)魅力[J];時代文學(上半月);2011年02期

4 徐默凡;;語形辭格的象似性研究[J];當代修辭學;2010年01期

5 羅玉敏;羅荷香;;“反復”修辭格的文體語用功能探析[J];江西科技師范學院學報;2009年03期

6 鄒瑩潔;;層遞的語用分析[J];宜賓學院學報;2009年04期

7 尚康康;;頂真修辭的語篇功能分析[J];廣東工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2008年S1期

8 康梅林;李鵬洲;;層遞辭格的特點和心理依據(jù)探析[J];襄樊學院學報;2007年06期

9 楊樹郁;對比辭格中比較思維的體現(xiàn)形態(tài)[J];齊齊哈爾大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年05期

10 孔漫春;試析墨子比喻的類型及作用[J];平頂山師專學報;2002年06期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 艾紅娟;墨家的語言學思想[D];曲阜師范大學;2002年

，

本文編號：1822032