發(fā)布時間：2018-04-22 00:08

  本文選題：漢語大詞典 + 兩漢��； 參考：《海南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自中國法律語言學(xué)創(chuàng)始后,漢語法律詞匯研究越發(fā)系統(tǒng)化。目前法律詞匯系統(tǒng)化主要體現(xiàn)在對斷代專書法律詞匯的研究。但是以詞典為基礎(chǔ)語料進(jìn)行全面的斷代詞匯研究成果甚少,這不得不說是一個很大的遺憾。因為詞典所儲存的語料,相比專書來說,詞匯要豐富得多,有利于我們更為全面了解探求法律詞匯,遂以詞典為基礎(chǔ)語料,進(jìn)行斷代詞語研究勢在必行。兩漢時代是我國古代社會轉(zhuǎn)型的重要時期,法律同政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等領(lǐng)域均發(fā)生了重大變革,作為語言最敏感的要素——詞語必定會據(jù)法記事,遂從詞語角度探求兩漢法律詞匯的面貌與特點、法律制度沿革與變化是可行的。鑒于此,本文以匯聚古今詞匯的《漢語大詞典》為基礎(chǔ)語料,通過客觀的歸納、描寫《漢語大詞典》所隱含的兩漢法律新詞,特別是其中的司法新詞,同時對兩漢時期的司法新義同義詞以辨析。本文的研究對象為兩漢司法新詞,這是因為兩漢新義司法詞語最具有兩漢時代特色,最能夠反映出兩漢司法以及司法詞語發(fā)展的面貌。另外,本文著重在封閉語言環(huán)境中辨析了“立法、告劾、逮捕、審判、懲辦”語義場的司法同義詞,在語義特征、組合搭配以及語用特點方面的異同。研究方法主要為客觀描寫法與傳統(tǒng)訓(xùn)詁方法,即從共時角度描寫兩漢時期法律詞匯的面貌;從歷時角度分析同義詞源義、引申義演變中詞義的細(xì)微差異;同時將典型范疇理論運(yùn)用到選取司法同義詞之中。此外,綜合運(yùn)用傳統(tǒng)詞匯訓(xùn)詁學(xué)理論與方法、現(xiàn)代語言學(xué)理論與方法,以探究兩漢法律詞匯的基本面貌,是本次研究的新意亮點所在。第一章,首先概述漢語法律語言研究、兩漢司法制度以及古漢語同義詞的研究現(xiàn)狀;其次介紹本文的目的、價值及研究的具體方法;最后對本文語料庫來源以及詞語、司法詞語、同義詞進(jìn)行界定與判斷。第二章,在共時平面對兩漢行政法、經(jīng)濟(jì)法、民法、刑法訴、訴訟法、其他法新詞新語進(jìn)行客觀描寫,以展示兩漢時期法律建設(shè)的主要面貌。第三章,本文研究重點為司法新同義詞辨析。我們首先從詞本義、引申義及核心義等角度,探析司法新同義詞在語義特點、組合特征、語用特點上的異同,其次從詞義源流發(fā)展的角度出發(fā),分析兩漢時代司法新同義詞形成的理據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Since the founding of Chinese legal linguistics, the study of Chinese legal vocabulary has become more and more systematic. At present, the systematization of legal vocabulary is mainly reflected in the study of the legal vocabulary of special books. However, it is a great pity to do comprehensive lexical research based on dictionaries. Because the data stored in dictionaries are much more abundant than specialized books, it is helpful for us to understand the legal vocabulary more comprehensively, so it is imperative to study the words of different dynasties by taking dictionaries as the basic corpus. The period of the Han Dynasty was an important period of social transformation in ancient China. Great changes had taken place in the fields of law, politics, economy, culture and so on. As the most sensitive element of language, words and expressions must be recorded according to law. Therefore, it is feasible to explore the features and features of the legal vocabulary in the Han Dynasty from the perspective of words, and the evolution and changes of the legal system. In view of this, this paper, based on the Chinese Dictionary, which gathers ancient and modern words, describes the legal neologisms of the Han Dynasty, especially the judicial neologisms, which are implied in the Chinese Dictionary through objective induction. At the same time, the synonyms of judicial new meanings in the Han Dynasty were analyzed. The research object of this paper is the judicial neologisms of the Han Dynasty, which is because the judicial words of the new meaning of the Han Dynasty have the characteristics of the Han Dynasty and can best reflect the appearance of the development of the judicial words and the judicial words in the Han Dynasty. In addition, this paper analyzes the synonyms of "legislation, impeachment, arrest, trial and punishment" in the closed language environment, and the similarities and differences in semantic features, combinations and collocations as well as pragmatic features. The research methods are mainly objective descriptive method and traditional exegesis method, that is, describing the appearance of legal vocabulary in the Han Dynasty from a synchronic perspective, analyzing the origin meaning of synonyms from a diachronic point of view, and introducing the subtle differences in the meaning of words in the evolution of semantic meaning. At the same time, the typical category theory is applied to the selection of judicial synonyms. In addition, comprehensive use of the theory and method of traditional lexical exegetics and modern linguistic theories and methods to explore the basic features of the legal vocabulary in the Han Dynasty is the new bright spot of this study. The first chapter first summarizes the research of Chinese legal language, the judicial system of Han Dynasty and the synonyms of ancient Chinese; secondly, it introduces the purpose, value and research methods of this paper; finally, it introduces the source of corpus and the words and expressions of this paper. Judicial words and synonyms are defined and judged. In the second chapter, the administrative law, economic law, civil law, criminal law, procedural law and other new words of law are described objectively in the synchronic plane to show the main features of the legal construction in the Han Dynasty. In the third chapter, this paper focuses on the analysis of the new synonyms of judicature. First of all, we analyze the similarities and differences in semantic characteristics, combination characteristics and pragmatic characteristics of new judicial synonyms from the perspectives of the original meaning of words, the introduction of meaning and the core meaning, and then from the perspective of the development of the source and stream of word meaning. Analysis of the formation of new judicial synonyms in the Han Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王雪亭;王東海;;古漢語中單音節(jié)詞法律詞義的形成方式例析[J];魯東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 賀菊玲;;從“坐”看義位的對立與演變[J];西安工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年11期

3 賈毅;;淺談秦漢時期的刑事偵查制度[J];黑龍江史志;2014年22期

4 王云路;;“按(案)”詞義考[J];語言研究;2013年03期

5 汪太賢;;漢語“憲法”意義考正[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2012年06期

6 吳淑瓊;;法律詞匯空缺的理據(jù)研究[J];貴州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年08期

7 袁世旭;;法律詞語的理據(jù)[J];河北理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年05期

8 李杰;;從法律用語看《唐律疏議》“禮法結(jié)合”的特點[J];湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年03期

9 王東海;王麗英;;《唐律疏議》法律詞語的訓(xùn)釋研究[J];勵耘學(xué)刊(語言卷);2007年02期

10 牟玉華;張小麗;;先秦法律用語同義現(xiàn)象探析[J];江西社會科學(xué);2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 胡憲麗;基于《漢語大詞典》語料庫的唐代新詞語研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

2 趙久湘;秦漢簡牘法律用語研究[D];西南大學(xué);2011年

3 彭文芳;古代刑名詮考[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

4 周琳娜;清代新詞新義位發(fā)展演變研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

5 閆從發(fā);基于《漢語大詞典》語料庫的時代漢語詞匯研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

6 王彤偉;《三國志》同義詞研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 任倩倩;《陳書》同義詞研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2014年

2 賈麗蕊;《唐律疏議》法律詞匯同義詞研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2013年

3 謝靜婕;基于義素分析法的《說文解字》同義詞研究[D];云南大學(xué);2013年

4 于文靜;《元典章·刑部》法律詞語研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

5 賈佳;《商君書》法律詞語研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2012年

6 主金超;隋代新詞新義研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

7 向潔;《史記》法律詞語研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

8 李如鷹;《漢書》法律詞語與《漢語大詞典》的修訂[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年

9 白琬琳;《說文解字》中的法律詞語研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2008年

10 牟玉華;先秦儒家法律用語研究[D];西南師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1784710