本文選題：上下限 + 副詞��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：主觀量研究是漢語句法語義研究的一個熱點問題。該研究主要關(guān)注語言的主觀性如何落在量范疇之上,以及有哪些主觀量的表現(xiàn)形式。這方面的研究已經(jīng)取得了豐碩成果。本文集中討論具有[+上限]或[+下限]語義特征的副詞(我們合稱為上下限副詞)在主觀量表達中的作用,包括:(1)上下限副詞的范圍;(2)上下限副詞可以幫助表達何種主觀量;(3)上下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時在語義、句法、語用三個平面各有哪些特點;(4)意義相同或相近的上下限副詞在表達主觀量方面有何異同。全文共分為六章。第一章為緒論,闡明本文的研究對象,回顧前人的研究成果,涉及到上下限副詞的相關(guān)研究以及主觀量理論的相關(guān)研究。此外介紹了本文的研究內(nèi)容、研究意義、研究方法、語料來源等。第二章主要是確定上下限副詞的范圍。我們以[+大于或等于]或[+小于或等于]的語義特征為標(biāo)準(zhǔn),參考幾部重要的虛詞詞典的釋義,最終確定了十個上下限副詞,它們是:至多、最多、頂多、至少、最少、頂少、起碼、不過、不止、充其量。根據(jù)它們表達何種主觀量,把它們分為表主觀大量的下限副詞和表主觀小量的上限副詞。第三章重點描寫上下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時在語義平面所能夠搭配的量的語義類型,分別描寫了上限副詞搭配的量的語義類型和下限副詞搭配的量的語義類型。第四章重點考察上下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時在句法平面所能夠進入的句法格式,根據(jù)副詞、數(shù)量、主語、動詞的相互位置關(guān)系,我們設(shè)定了八種可能的句法格式,分別考察上限副詞和下限副詞進入這八種句法格式的情況。第五章重點分析上下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時所表現(xiàn)出來的語用特點,我們設(shè)定了四組語用特征,分別考察上限副詞和下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時是否全部具備這四組語用特征。第六章是結(jié)語,對全文考察的結(jié)果進行了比較和梳理�？偨Y(jié)出十個上下限副詞在幫助表達主觀量時在句法、語義、語用三個平面表現(xiàn)出來的特點。對同義的上下限副詞從主觀量的角度進行了辨析。最后,得出本文的考察結(jié)論,并指出有待進一步深入研究的問題。
[Abstract]:The study of subjective quantity is a hot topic in the study of Chinese syntax and semantics.This study focuses on how the subjectivity of language falls above the category of quantity and what forms of subjective quantity are represented.Great achievements have been made in this field.This paper focuses on the role of adverbs with the semantic characteristics of [upper] or lower bound (which we collectively call upper and lower bound adverbs) in the expression of subjective variables.Including: 1) the scope of the upper and lower limits adverbs, (2) the upper and lower limits adverbs can help to express the subjective quantity / / 3) the upper and lower limits adverbs are semantic and syntactic when they help to express the subjective quantities,What are the features of each of the three planes of pragmatics? what are the similarities and differences of the upper and lower limits adverbs with the same or similar meanings in expressing subjective quantities?The full text is divided into six chapters.The first chapter is an introduction to clarify the object of this study, review the previous research results, involving the upper and lower limits of adverbs and subjective theory of the relevant research.In addition, this paper introduces the research content, research significance, research methods, language sources and so on.The second chapter is to determine the range of upper and lower limits adverbs.Based on the semantic characteristics of [greater or equal] or [less than or equal to], and referring to the interpretation of several important dictionaries of function words, we have finally determined ten upper and lower limits adverbs. They are: most, most, at most, at least, at least, at the top, and at the top.At least, but more than, at best.According to the subjective quantities they express, they can be divided into a large number of lower bound adverbs and upper bound adverbs.The third chapter focuses on describing the semantic types of the quantities that the upper and lower limits adverbs can collocate in the semantic plane when they help to express subjective quantities, and describe the semantic types of the quantity collocation of upper bound adverbs and the quantity of lower bound adverbs respectively.The fourth chapter focuses on the syntactic formats that the upper and lower limits adverbs can enter in the syntactic plane when they help to express subjective quantities. According to the relationship between adverbs, quantities, subjects and verbs, we have set up eight possible syntactic formats.The upper bound adverb and the lower bound adverb enter these eight syntactic forms respectively.The fifth chapter focuses on the pragmatic characteristics of the upper and lower limits adverbs in helping to express subjective quantities. We set up four groups of pragmatic features.To investigate whether the upper bound adverb and lower bound adverb have these four pragmatic characteristics when they help to express subjective quantity.The sixth chapter is the conclusion, which compares and combs the results of the full-text investigation.The characteristics of ten upper and lower limits adverbs in syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects are summarized.The upper and lower limits adverbs of synonymy are analyzed from the angle of subjective quantity.Finally, the conclusion of this paper is drawn, and the problems that need to be further studied are pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫鵬飛;;形容詞謂語句中的量級共現(xiàn)——從“有點兒小+A”構(gòu)式說開去[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2017年01期

2 賈澤林;;量級義副詞“起碼”與“至少”[J];漢語學(xué)報;2016年02期

3 陳琳;;“充其量”的句法語義功能及其演化[J];常熟理工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期

4 賈澤林;;副詞“起碼”的語義、語用分析[J];語文研究;2015年01期

5 羅榮華;劉英;;“充其量”的詞匯化與主觀量[J];泰山學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

6 常志偉;;“不過”副詞化機制的認(rèn)知視角[J];天中學(xué)刊;2013年05期

7 李娟;任夏婉;;“至少”的義項分解及其性質(zhì)[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2013年09期

8 黃藝敏;;淺議“不只”與“不止”的區(qū)別[J];時代文學(xué)(上半月);2013年06期

9 高莉;;“不過”的主觀性與交互主觀性建構(gòu)[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

10 劉立成;;“不過、頂多、至多、最多”辨[J];哈爾濱師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 楊娟;現(xiàn)代漢語模糊量研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

2 齊春紅;現(xiàn)代漢語語氣副詞研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

3 李善熙;漢語“主觀量”的表達研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 周新華;現(xiàn)代漢語語氣副詞表主觀量考察[D];河北大學(xué);2016年

2 李真;現(xiàn)代漢語“最X不過”結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2015年

3 李孟函;現(xiàn)代漢語限定副詞表主觀量考察[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

4 呂丹;“至少”的語義及篇章功能分析[D];上海師范大學(xué);2013年

5 謝晶;雙音節(jié)低量級程度副詞的多維分析[D];江西師范大學(xué);2012年

6 李娟;“至少”的多角度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

7 張璐;主觀量視角下的副詞歧義研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2012年

8 陳林萍;反義副詞“至多”、“至少”的對稱與不對稱研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

9 朱曉琳;低限定類范圍副詞研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

10 鄧慧愛;限定范圍副詞演變研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1758040