本文選題：《左傳》 + 疑問(wèn)句��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《左傳》作為中國(guó)第一部敘事詳細(xì)的編年史著作,是研究先秦時(shí)期歷史的重要文獻(xiàn),它代表了先秦史學(xué)的最高成就。不僅具有豐富的史學(xué)、文學(xué)研究?jī)r(jià)值,更具有極高的語(yǔ)言研究?jī)r(jià)值�！蹲髠鳌吩敿�(xì)記載了春秋時(shí)代的歷史,但其所講又不限于這段歷史,還涉及從古史傳說(shuō)到夏商周三代的歷史。它補(bǔ)充并豐富了《春秋》的內(nèi)容,一改《春秋》流水賬式的記史方法,代之以有系統(tǒng)、有組織的史書編纂方法,大大提高了《左傳》的史料價(jià)值,成為研究上古漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法的重要史料。本文試結(jié)合標(biāo)記理論和三個(gè)平面語(yǔ)法理論,采用定量分析與定性研究相結(jié)合、以及歷時(shí)對(duì)比的研究方法,對(duì)《左傳》中的疑問(wèn)句進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的研究和分析,以期管窺春秋時(shí)期疑問(wèn)句發(fā)展使用和演變規(guī)律,探究其在漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法史上的地位,盡可能的完善《左傳》疑問(wèn)句的相關(guān)研究,為上古漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法史的后續(xù)研究提供一些可能的參考。文章共分為五個(gè)部分。第一章是緒論,對(duì)《左傳》及作者進(jìn)行了介紹,綜述了《左傳》中疑問(wèn)句的研究狀況,并闡述了本文采用的研究方法和研究意義。第二到四章,文章結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)標(biāo)記理論分別對(duì)《左傳》中的詢問(wèn)句、反詰句、測(cè)度句進(jìn)行了分類、研究和分析。在疑問(wèn)句的分類問(wèn)題上,先采用呂叔湘先生在《中國(guó)文法要略》中的分類方法(按疑問(wèn)程度分類)將《左傳》中的疑問(wèn)句分為詢問(wèn)句、測(cè)度句、反詰句三大類;然后再根據(jù)問(wèn)句的句法結(jié)構(gòu)形式對(duì)詢問(wèn)句和反詰句進(jìn)行下位分類:依據(jù)黃伯榮先生在《陳述句、疑問(wèn)句、祈使句、感嘆句》中的分類法把詢問(wèn)句分為特指問(wèn)、是非問(wèn)、選擇問(wèn)、正反問(wèn);把反詰句分為特指問(wèn)反詰句和是非問(wèn)反詰句兩大類;最后,根據(jù)疑問(wèn)標(biāo)記理論對(duì)其進(jìn)行下下位分類。經(jīng)研究、對(duì)比發(fā)現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)疑問(wèn)句類型的基本框架早在上古漢語(yǔ)時(shí)期就已基本成型,且有標(biāo)疑問(wèn)句是《左傳》乃至上古漢語(yǔ)疑問(wèn)句的主要形式,《左傳》疑問(wèn)句的演變情況在上古漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法史的發(fā)展歷程中起到一定的承上啟下的作用。第五章是結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,在對(duì)《左傳》疑問(wèn)句整體面貌進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上與《史記》進(jìn)行大致的對(duì)比分析并作出歸納和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan, as the first detailed chronicle of narration in China, is an important document in the study of the history of the Pre-Qin Dynasty. It represents the highest achievement of the historiography of the Pre-Qin Dynasty.Zuo Zhuan records the history of the Spring and Autumn period in detail, but it is not limited to this history, but also involves the history of three dynasties from ancient history to Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties.It complements and enriches the contents of "Spring and Autumn", changes income's book-style method of recording history, and replaces it with a systematic and organized method of compiling historical books, which greatly improves the value of historical materials in "Zuo Zhuan".It has become an important historical material for the study of ancient Chinese grammar.Based on the mark-up theory and the three plane grammar theories, this paper makes a systematic study and analysis of the interrogative sentences in Zuo Zhuan by combining quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, as well as diachronic comparison.In order to explore the rules of the development and evolution of interrogative sentences in the Spring and Autumn period, to explore its position in the history of Chinese grammar, and to perfect the related research of the interrogative sentences in Zuo Zhuan as far as possible, this paper provides some possible references for the further study of the history of grammar in ancient Chinese.The article is divided into five parts.The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces Zuo Zhuan and the author, summarizes the research status of the interrogative sentences in Zuo Zhuan, and expounds the research methods and significance of this paper.In the second to fourth chapters, the paper classifies, studies and analyzes the interrogative sentence, rhetorical sentence and measure sentence in Zuo Zhuan.On the question of the classification of interrogative sentences, the question sentences in Zuo Zhuan are divided into three categories: interrogative sentence, measure sentence and rhetorical sentence by using the classification method of Lv Shuxiang in "Chinese Grammar" (classified according to the degree of doubt), which is divided into three categories: interrogative sentence, measure sentence and rhetorical sentence.Then according to the syntactic structure of the question sentence, the interrogative sentence and the rhetorical sentence are subdivided into interrogative sentences and rhetorical sentences: according to the classification of Mr. Huang Bolong in < statement, question, imperative, exclamatory sentence >, the interrogative sentence is divided into specific question, right and wrong, choose question,It divides the rhetorical sentence into two categories: the specific question rhetorical sentence and the right question rhetorical sentence. Finally, the author classifies the rhetorical sentence according to the theory of interrogative markers.According to the research, the basic framework for comparing the types of interrogative sentences in modern Chinese has been basically formed in the period of ancient Chinese.Moreover, the marked interrogative sentence is the main form of the interrogative sentence in Zuo Zhuan and even in the ancient Chinese. The evolution of the interrogative sentence plays a role in the development of the grammatical history of the ancient Chinese.The fifth chapter is the conclusion part, on the basis of the analysis of the whole appearance of the interrogative sentence in Zuo Zhuan, the author makes a general comparative analysis with the Book of History and concludes and summarizes it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H141

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇燕;;《左傳》句尾疑問(wèn)語(yǔ)氣詞“乎”研究[J];柳州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

2 孫同柱;;《左傳》中的連用語(yǔ)氣詞探析[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2008年18期

3 劉春萍;;戰(zhàn)國(guó)時(shí)代疑問(wèn)代詞“惡、安、焉”[J];平頂山學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

4 何樂(lè)士;專書語(yǔ)法研究的回顧與展望[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年06期

5 貝羅貝;吳福祥;;上古漢語(yǔ)疑問(wèn)代詞的發(fā)展與演變[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;2000年04期

6 李生信;古今漢語(yǔ)疑問(wèn)代詞的發(fā)展與變化[J];固原師專學(xué)報(bào);1999年05期

7 李宇明;;疑問(wèn)標(biāo)記的復(fù)用及標(biāo)記功能的衰變[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1997年02期

8 白平;;談《左傳》中的三種“何……之……”式[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1996年02期

9 邵敬敏;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)選擇問(wèn)研究[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;1994年02期

10 劉曉南;先秦語(yǔ)氣詞的歷時(shí)多義現(xiàn)象[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;1991年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳靜;《史記》問(wèn)句系統(tǒng)研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張俊華;《左傳》與《史記》若干詞匯、語(yǔ)法現(xiàn)象比較研究[D];西北大學(xué);2015年

2 馬麗娜;《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》疑問(wèn)句研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2014年

3 田美;《說(shuō)苑》疑問(wèn)句研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2007年

4 冷艷青;《三遂平妖傳》疑問(wèn)句研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1736253