本文選題：語(yǔ)言符號(hào)　切入點(diǎn)：任意性　出處：《外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年06期

【摘要】：針對(duì)學(xué)界對(duì)索緒爾語(yǔ)言符號(hào)任意性的爭(zhēng)論,本文通過(guò)文本解讀,梳理索氏語(yǔ)哲致思路徑,厘清其語(yǔ)言符號(hào)任意性的本質(zhì)屬性,進(jìn)而思考和澄清爭(zhēng)論中存在的問(wèn)題。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),索氏語(yǔ)哲本質(zhì)在于切斷語(yǔ)言與實(shí)在之聯(lián)系,在語(yǔ)言內(nèi)尋求符號(hào)意義本體的解釋;任意性乃成為語(yǔ)言符號(hào)意義解釋之第一原則;據(jù)此,索氏體系的核心概念逐步進(jìn)入其理論視野,從而形成獨(dú)具特色的語(yǔ)哲意義理論和原創(chuàng)的普通語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論體系;學(xué)界之所以誤解索氏任意性是因?yàn)橛嘘P(guān)學(xué)者只關(guān)注該原則的語(yǔ)言學(xué)特性,而忽視了其語(yǔ)哲屬性。
[Abstract]:In view of the debate on the arbitrariness of Saussure's language symbols in academic circles, this paper, by means of textual interpretation, combs the path of philosophical thinking in Saussure language, clarifies the essential attributes of arbitrariness of Saussure's language symbols, and then considers and clarifies the problems existing in the debate. The essence of Soxhlet's philosophy is to cut off the connection between language and reality, and to seek the interpretation of symbolic meaning Noumenon in language. Arbitrariness is the first principle of the interpretation of linguistic symbolic meaning. According to this, the core concepts of Soxhlet's system gradually enter its theoretical field of vision. The academic circles misunderstand the arbitrariness of Sohn because the scholars concerned only pay attention to the linguistic characteristics of the principle and ignore its linguistic attributes.
【作者單位】： 廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言文化學(xué)院;廣州華立科技職業(yè)學(xué)院國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)與外語(yǔ)學(xué)部;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項(xiàng)目“構(gòu)建當(dāng)代中國(guó)話語(yǔ)研究的語(yǔ)言哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)”(15YJA740013)
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張q，

本文編號(hào)：1684506