本文選題：韓禮德　切入點(diǎn)：喬姆斯基　出處：《語(yǔ)文建設(shè)》2017年30期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正當(dāng)今語(yǔ)言學(xué)有兩大派別,一是形式主義,二是功能主義。形式主義以美國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)家喬姆斯基的轉(zhuǎn)換生成語(yǔ)法為代表,其將語(yǔ)言視為一個(gè)實(shí)在本體,從語(yǔ)言本身及語(yǔ)言內(nèi)部展開(kāi)研究。功能主義以英國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)家韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法為代表,其將語(yǔ)言學(xué)視為與社會(huì)發(fā)生聯(lián)系的工具,從語(yǔ)境與社會(huì)功能方面展開(kāi)研究。二者都研究語(yǔ)言的本質(zhì)是什么,但研究角度和方法有很大差異,這恰恰使二者能相互補(bǔ)充。本文比較研究喬姆斯基與韓禮德的語(yǔ)言觀,為讀者走進(jìn)語(yǔ)言學(xué)提供幫助。
[Abstract]:Now there are two major schools of linguistics: formalism and functionalism. Formalism is represented by Chomsky's transformational generative grammar, which regards language as a reality. Functionalism is represented by Halliday's systemic functional Grammar, which regards linguistics as a tool to connect with society. From the aspect of context and social function, they both study the essence of language, but the research angle and method are very different, which makes them complement each other. This paper makes a comparative study of Chomsky and Halliday's views on language. To help readers walk into linguistics.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古包頭師范學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H0-06
，

本文編號(hào)：1639366