本文選題：《切韻》　切入點(diǎn)：止攝支韻　出處：《語(yǔ)言研究》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：高本漢《切韻》支韻的擬音iě與李榮的改擬-ie,二者形似而實(shí)不同,形成了中古擬音的兩大派別。高本漢《切韻》支韻的擬音-iě是前響復(fù)元音,李榮支韻-ie是后響復(fù)元音,與高擬有著本質(zhì)上的不同�！斑^(guò)渡音擴(kuò)張說(shuō)”可以為高擬支韻對(duì)閩方言福州話-ie的音理問(wèn)題提供理論支持。從上古音的角度看,李氏的構(gòu)擬優(yōu)于高擬,高擬的-iě應(yīng)是晚期現(xiàn)象。但高擬支韻的-iě構(gòu)擬和李擬-ie構(gòu)擬著眼點(diǎn)不同,從中古音的角度看,二家孰是孰非,目前尚難遽斷。
[Abstract]:The imitatory sounds of Gao Benhan and Li Rong are similar and different in shape and form two major schools of middle ancient imitating sounds. The mimic vowels of Gao Benhan, Qi Yun and Zhi Yun are antecedent compound vowels, and Li Rong rhyme -ie is the post-reverberation vowels. The theory of transition phonological expansion can provide theoretical support for the phonological problems of Fuzhou-ie dialect in Fujian dialect. From the point of view of upper ancient sound, Li's construction is superior to Gao's. The high-I analogue is a late phenomenon, but it is different from Li Xin-ie. From the point of view of the middle ancient sound, it is difficult to judge which one is right or wrong.
【作者單位】： 首都師范大學(xué)中國(guó)詩(shī)歌研究中心文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：H113
，

本文編號(hào)：1630668