本文選題：批評隱喻分析　切入點：概念隱喻　出處：《山東科技大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隱喻的研究由來已久,從范圍和方法層面可以將國內外的研究概括為隱喻的修辭學研究、隱喻的語義學研究和隱喻的多學科研究,后者著重強調認知語言學領域的研究。Lakoff和Johnson在1980年合著的《我們賴以生存的隱喻》一書,開創(chuàng)了隱喻研究的新紀元,標志著隱喻研究由傳統(tǒng)的修辭功能領域轉向認知功能領域。Charteris-Black在2004年提出的批評隱喻分析更是被視為批評話語分析的一種新方法,并且為隱喻分析提供了新思路。它綜合運用認知語言學、批評話語分析、語料庫研究和語用學知識,彌補了概念隱喻分析在語用學領域的不足。目前批評隱喻分析的研究熱點主要集中在具有明顯意識形態(tài)的政治語篇,例如總統(tǒng)演講和政府工作報告,但對表達感情的情感成語研究較少。情感是日常生活中一種普遍性的人類體驗,并與認知互為影響,為了形象生動地表達情感,人們往往將其隱喻化,因此基于概念隱喻理論分析情感成語的現(xiàn)象也十分普遍。然而情感成語的隱喻研究往往只注重分析隱喻的映射機制,并著重對英漢情感成語在隱喻表達上的共性和個性進行闡述,并沒有結合語篇進行深入分析。綜合上述原因,本文選取《新華成語詞典》中的情感成語作為研究對象,基于批評隱喻分析理論和概念隱喻理論,并結合成語的出處作為語境深入分析情感成語背后表達的情感態(tài)度及意識形態(tài),彌補了情感成語隱喻分析在語用研究層面的不足。經(jīng)過分析可知,《新華成語詞典》中主要存在六類情感成語隱喻,它們分別是身體隱喻,方位隱喻、溫度隱喻、顏色隱喻、容器隱喻和動植物隱喻。情感成語的批評隱喻分析過程遵循隱喻識別、隱喻闡釋和隱喻說明三個步驟。同時本文還結合成語出處作為語境,分析情感成語的隱喻構建機制,領會作者表達的情感態(tài)度,揭示隱喻隱藏的意識形態(tài)功能和社會價值,比如情感激發(fā)、信息篩選以及評價功能。利用批評隱喻分析理論對《新華成語詞典》中的情感成語進行分析不僅彌補了概念隱喻理論在分析上的不足,拓寬了批評隱喻分析的研究范圍,還為情感成語的隱喻研究開拓了新思路,而且有利于人們利用成語更好地表達情感,抒發(fā)情懷。
[Abstract]:The study of metaphor has a long history. From the aspect of scope and method, it can be summarized as the rhetorical study of metaphor, the semantic study of metaphor and the multidisciplinary study of metaphor. The latter emphasizes the research in the field of cognitive linguistics. Lakoff and Johnson co-wrote metaphor for our existence in 1980, which marks a new era in metaphor study. The metaphorical analysis proposed by Charteris-Black in 2004 is regarded as a new approach to critical discourse analysis. It combines cognitive linguistics, critical discourse analysis, corpus research and pragmatic knowledge. It makes up for the shortcomings of conceptual metaphor analysis in the field of pragmatics. At present, the research focus of critical metaphor analysis is mainly on political discourse with obvious ideology, such as presidential speech and government work report. However, there are few studies on emotional idioms to express emotion. Emotion is a universal human experience in daily life, and it has mutual influence with cognition. In order to express emotion vividly, people often use metaphor to express emotion. Therefore, it is also very common to analyze affective idioms based on conceptual metaphor theory. However, the metaphorical studies of affective idioms tend to focus only on the mapping mechanism of metaphors. It also focuses on the generality and individuality of Chinese and English affective idioms in metaphorical expression, and does not make a thorough analysis of the text. For the above reasons, this paper chooses the emotional idioms in Xinhua idiom Dictionary as the object of study. Based on the critical metaphorical analysis theory and conceptual metaphor theory, and combining the provenance of idioms as context, this paper deeply analyzes the emotional attitude and ideology behind the emotional idioms. The analysis shows that there are six kinds of affective idiom metaphors in Xinhua idiom Dictionary, which are body metaphor, orientation metaphor, temperature metaphor and color metaphor. Container metaphor and animal and plant metaphors. The critical metaphor analysis of affective idioms follows three steps: metaphorical recognition, metaphorical interpretation and metaphorical explanation. At the same time, this paper analyzes the metaphorical construction mechanism of affective idioms in the context of idiom provenance. Understanding the emotional attitudes expressed by the author, revealing the hidden ideological functions and social values of metaphor, such as emotional arousal, The analysis of emotional idioms in Xinhua idiom Dictionary not only makes up for the deficiency of conceptual metaphor theory, but also widens the research scope of critical metaphor analysis. It also opens up new ideas for metaphor study of affective idioms and helps people express their feelings and feelings better by using idioms.
【學位授予單位】：山東科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H15

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孫炬;房薇薇;;批評隱喻分析視角下奧巴馬2016年國情咨文分析[J];魯東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年05期

2 張楠;;《紐約時報》對中國經(jīng)濟增長放緩報道的批評隱喻分析[J];語文學刊(外語教育教學);2015年07期

3 鳳群;;隱喻和政治神話的實現(xiàn):美國總統(tǒng)演講的批評隱喻分析——從里根到奧巴馬[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2013年01期

4 林寶珠;;新修辭學視角下的隱喻批評性分析[J];長春工程學院學報(社會科學版);2012年02期

5 王維民;黃婭;;從概念隱喻看政府的意識形態(tài)與執(zhí)政理念——以國務院《政府工作報告》(1978～2011)為例[J];西南交通大學學報(社會科學版);2012年03期

6 張蕾;;隱喻研究的批評話語分析視角[J];山東外語教學;2011年05期

7 孫亞;;教育公平話語的積極隱喻分析——以《同在藍天下——怎么看教育公平》為例[J];華文教學與研究;2011年03期

8 裴霜霜;周榕;;以自然語篇和語料庫為基礎的隱喻研究——《語篇中的隱喻》述介[J];外語教學與研究;2011年02期

9 趙雪梅;;隱喻的批評性分析——批評隱喻分析[J];外語藝術教育研究;2010年03期

10 朱煒;;試論隱喻的意識形態(tài)性[J];南京社會科學;2010年07期

，

本文編號：1559474