本文關(guān)鍵詞：東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言問候和告別言語行為的語用策略對(duì)比研究　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 問候語 告別語 言語行為 語用策略 社會(huì)語用 跨文化語用

【摘要】：語言是迄今為止人們最基本的日常交流途徑,東鄉(xiāng)語作為東鄉(xiāng)族特有的語言,承載著該民族的歷史和文化,但是現(xiàn)在東鄉(xiāng)語已經(jīng)成為國內(nèi)公布的瀕危語之一,因此保護(hù)東鄉(xiāng)語勢(shì)在必行。在大部分語言中,問候語和告別語是建立和維持社會(huì)關(guān)系的兩種有效途徑,在日常生活和交際中扮演著十分重要的角色。問候是人們之間情感交流和加強(qiáng)理解的不可缺少的因素,它意味著人際交往的開始,告別則意味著人際交往的結(jié)束,后者更加強(qiáng)調(diào)會(huì)話雙方的關(guān)系。當(dāng)問候或告別時(shí),不同文化背景的人們會(huì)誤解對(duì)方并導(dǎo)致語用失誤。因此我們必須在問候和告別時(shí)基于不同的社會(huì)語用因素,這樣就能夠傳遞我們想要表達(dá)的意義。當(dāng)然不管用何種方式,我們都需要保持禮貌,盡量使用合適的話語維持對(duì)方的面子。所以對(duì)兩種不同社會(huì)背景下問候語和告別語的對(duì)比研究有著重要意義。之前對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)語的研究主要集中在生態(tài)語言學(xué)和文化的角度,本研究則著重從社會(huì)語用學(xué)的角度進(jìn)行分析。本研究從社會(huì)語用學(xué)的角度考察問候和告別言語行為,探討禮貌與言語行為的關(guān)系,并考察年齡和權(quán)勢(shì)因素對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)族人們實(shí)施問候和告別語語用策略有何影響,同時(shí)探討東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言中人們實(shí)施問候和告別語的語用策略時(shí)有何異同以及產(chǎn)生異同的原因。本研究主要參考Blum-Kulka等人1989年的“跨文化言語行為實(shí)現(xiàn)研究項(xiàng)目”(CCSARP)的研究方法,通過訪談,錄音錄像,角色扮演獲得自然和半自然語料,并基于這些語料,設(shè)計(jì)調(diào)查問卷,經(jīng)過預(yù)測(cè)——修改——大范圍的問卷調(diào)查的過程,收集語料。之后采用定量和定性兩種研究方法,對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言實(shí)施問候和告別語的語用策略進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析。本研究的對(duì)象分別來自土生土長(zhǎng)的操東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言的本族語使用者中,研究者隨機(jī)選擇東鄉(xiāng)縣汪集鎮(zhèn)和榆中縣高崖鎮(zhèn)村民各330名作為受試。其中東鄉(xiāng)族男性青年55人,男性中年55人,男性老年55人,女性同上。蘭州漢族男性青年,中年,老年各55人,女性同上,年齡均在16到70歲之間。最終東鄉(xiāng)族得到有效問卷300份,蘭州得到有效問卷312份。本研究主要回答四個(gè)研究問題:(1)東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言中,在問候和告別時(shí),主要使用的語用策略有哪些?(2)年齡對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)族人們?cè)趯?shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí)是否存在影響?如果有影響,有何異同?(3)權(quán)勢(shì)對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)族人們?cè)趯?shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí)是否存在影響?如果有影響,有何異同?(4)東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言中,實(shí)施問候和告別語時(shí),語用策略的選擇是否存在異同,為什么?研究結(jié)果表明:(1)在東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言中,所有問候語和告別語語用策略均被受試者選擇使用,但是各項(xiàng)策略的使用頻次差異較大。例如:東鄉(xiāng)語中間接問候的頻次遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)大于蘭州方言中的頻次。(2)年齡因素對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)族人們?cè)趯?shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí)有影響且不同年齡之間存在異同。例如:在使用寒暄式問候,稱贊式問候,關(guān)心式問候以及因由式告別,直陳式告別,建議式告別時(shí),調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)顯示,均存在顯著性差異。東鄉(xiāng)老年在打招呼時(shí)傾向于使用關(guān)心式問候以表示關(guān)心和在意,而青年卻更多的使用寒暄式問候以表示親近和隨意。(3)權(quán)勢(shì)因素對(duì)東鄉(xiāng)族人們?cè)趯?shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí)有影響且權(quán)勢(shì)不同者存在異同。首先,權(quán)勢(shì)的高低對(duì)稱呼的使用有明顯的影響。例如:低權(quán)勢(shì)者使用稱呼的頻次多于高權(quán)勢(shì)者。其次,在東鄉(xiāng)語中,高權(quán)勢(shì)者和低權(quán)勢(shì)者在實(shí)施直接問候和間接問候時(shí)都存在顯著性差異。最后,對(duì)于附加策略而言,除了建議式告別,其余策略的使用情況都表現(xiàn)出顯著性差異,例如:對(duì)于高權(quán)勢(shì)者最常用的告別語用策略為直陳式告別,而對(duì)于低權(quán)勢(shì)者,最常用的則為因由式告別。(4)東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言在實(shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí),既存在相似之處,又有不同之處。相似點(diǎn)主要是對(duì)間接問候和告別語用策略的使用,不管是東鄉(xiāng)語還是蘭州方言都表現(xiàn)出較高的頻次,不同之處則在于各項(xiàng)附加策略使用的具體頻次以及高頻低頻的排列順序。例如:東鄉(xiāng)語中最常使用的是寒暄式問候,而蘭州方言中卻是稱謂式問候。東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言中,建議式告別的使用頻次都為最高,但其次東鄉(xiāng)語中為因由式告別而蘭州方言中為囑咐式告別�？傊�,東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言在實(shí)施問候和告別語語用策略時(shí)存在異同,本研究將從社會(huì)語用學(xué)以及禮貌原則等角度分析討論異同產(chǎn)生的原因。
[Abstract]:The language is so far the most basic way of daily communication, Dongxiang Dongxiang nationality language as a special language, carrying the nation's history and culture, but now Dongxiang has become one of the domestic published endangered language, therefore the protection of Dongxiang is imperative. In most languages, greetings and partings is to establish and maintain two an effective way of social relations, plays a very important role in the daily life and communication between people. Greetings are factors of emotional communication and strengthen the understanding of the essential, it means the beginning of interpersonal communication, farewell means the end of interpersonal communication, which emphasizes more on the relationship between the participants when greeting or farewell. And people from different cultural backgrounds will misunderstand each other and lead to pragmatic failure. So we must be based on different social pragmatic factors in greeting and farewell, so it can We want to transfer the meaning of the expression. Of course, regardless of what way, we all need to be polite and try to use proper words to maintain the other face. So the comparative study of two kinds of different social background of greeting and farewell is of great significance. The previous researches on Dongxiang language focused on the ecological and cultural linguistics this study focuses on the perspective from the perspectives of sociolinguistics and pragmatics analysis. Perspective of greeting and farewell speech act from the society of pragmatics, to explore the relationship between politeness and speech acts, and the effects of age and power for Dongxiang people to implement the impact of greetings and partings and pragmatic strategy, pragmatic strategies greeting and farewell to implement people in Dongxiang language and Lanzhou dialect of the similarities and differences between them. This study mainly refer to Blum-Kulka et al. 1989 " Cultural Speech Act Realization Research Project "(CCSARP) research methods, through interviews, video recording, role playing for natural and semi natural corpus, and based on these data, the design of the questionnaire, after forecasting - modify - process, a large-scale questionnaire survey to collect data. After using two kinds of quantitative and qualitative research methods. Pragmatic strategy implementation greetings and farewell to Dongxiang dialect and Lanzhou dialect were analyzed. The subjects of this study were from the native language and the Lanzhou dialect speaking Dongxiang native speakers, Gao Ya Zhen researchers randomly selected Dongxiang county and Yuzhong County, the villagers Wang Ji Zhen 330 subjects. The Dongxiang nationality young men 55 people, middle-aged male 55 people, male 55 people, female ibid. Lanzhou Han male youth, middle-aged and elderly women as above, each 55 people, between ages 16 to 70 years. The final in Dongxiang Family of 300 valid questionnaires, Lanzhou obtained 312 valid questionnaires. This study is to answer four research questions: (1) Dongxiang dialect and Lanzhou dialect, hello and goodbye, what are the pragmatic strategies used? (2) the impact of age on Dongxiang people is in the implementation of greeting and farewell. When pragmatic strategies exist? If yes, what are the differences? (3) influence of Dongxiang people in the implementation of greetings and partings of pragmatic strategies when exist? If yes, what are the differences? (4) Dongxiang dialect and Lanzhou dialect, the implementation of greeting and farewell, whether the selection of pragmatic strategies there are similarities and differences, why? The results show that: (1) in Dongxiang dialect and Lanzhou dialect, all greetings and partings of pragmatic strategies are the subjects choose to use, but the frequency of use of the difference strategy greatly. For example: indirect greetings Dongxiang language frequency is greater In the dialect of Lanzhou (2). The frequency of age on the similarities and differences of Dongxiang people and the influence of different age in the implementation of greetings and partings between pragmatic strategies. For example: the use of greeting greeting, compliment greeting, greeting and farewell care cause type, l'indicatif farewell, farewell proposal, survey data show that there are significant differences. In Dongxiang greeted the elderly tend to use care type to greet concern and care, while young people are more used to say to greeting greeting and free. (3) the power factors of the similarities and differences of Dongxiang people in the implementation of greeting and farewell with pragmatic strategies and the influence of different power. First, the power level has obvious influence on the use of the name. For example: low power use call frequency more than high power. Secondly, in Dongxiang, high power and low power in real There was significant difference between direct and indirect application of greeting greetings. Finally, suggestions for additional strategies, in addition to the use of other strategies goodbye, are showing significant differences, such as: high power for the most commonly used strategy for pragmatic l'indicatif farewell farewell, and for low power, is the most commonly used for the reason goodbye. (4) the Dongxiang language and Lanzhou dialect in the implementation of greetings and partings of pragmatic strategies, both similarities and differences. The similarities are mainly used for indirect greeting and farewell pragmatic strategy, whether it is Dongxiang or Lanzhou dialect showed a higher frequency, the difference is the use of the additional strategy specific frequency and the high frequency and the low frequency sequence. For example: the most commonly used language in Dongxiang is greeting greeting, while Lanzhou dialect is the appellation of greeting Dongxiang language and Lanzhou dialect. In the proposal farewell to the frequency of use is the highest, but the second language in Dongxiang for the cause and type in Lanzhou dialect to bid farewell goodbye. In a word, the Dongxiang language and Lanzhou dialect there are similarities and differences in the implementation of greetings and partings of pragmatic strategies, this study will analyze the social pragmatics and politeness principles discussed reasons the similarities and differences.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：H233;H172.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫艷華;淺談話語中的語用策略——以《坊っちゃん》中的人物角色為例[J];日語學(xué)習(xí)與研究;2005年02期

2 李妮;;預(yù)設(shè)與語用策略[J];山東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 加曉昕;;合作與悖反——交際中語用策略的類型解讀[J];理論界;2008年09期

4 廖錦超;;論隱喻的語用策略功能[J];玉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

5 周群強(qiáng);李晶;;會(huì)話中的語用策略[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(高教版);2010年01期

6 曹佳;;教師批評(píng)語用策略與文化因素[J];文學(xué)教育(上);2010年04期

7 李青苗;;《左傳》中引詩賦詩的語用策略分析[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2012年07期

8 劉娜;;中美語用策略在跨化交流下的探討[J];青年文學(xué)家;2013年08期

9 陳曦蓉;淺析語用策略在涉外商務(wù)談判中的應(yīng)用[J];莆田高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

10 馬安東,王維貞;省略的語用條件和語用策略[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 趙彬;;商務(wù)談判中語用策略研究[A];語言與文化研究（第七輯）[C];2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張淑玲;言語交際中非真實(shí)性話語作為語用策略的順應(yīng)性研究[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2006年

2 方傳余;言語幽默的語用策略研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳薇;主持人汪涵的語用策略研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2015年

2 胡美怡;從合作原則和禮貌原則的角度分析謊言[D];電子科技大學(xué);2014年

3 周龍;淺析紀(jì)錄片解說詞的語用策略[D];江西師范大學(xué);2015年

4 胡夢(mèng)靜;順應(yīng)論視角下釋放施害假信息的語用策略研究[D];江蘇師范大學(xué);2014年

5 呂廣閱;跨文化交際中身份建構(gòu)策略選擇意向的研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年

6 焦梅;東鄉(xiāng)語和蘭州方言問候和告別言語行為的語用策略對(duì)比研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

7 姜福民;部隊(duì)說服教育語用策略研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

8 徐輝;國際大專辯論的語用策略研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2009年

9 孔麗暉;公眾演講的語用策略研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

10 王海濤;網(wǎng)絡(luò)段子語用策略研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1366391