【摘要】：關(guān)于馬克思"不平衡關(guān)系"問(wèn)題,國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)術(shù)界曾有過(guò)兩次較大的論爭(zhēng):一次發(fā)生在20世紀(jì)50年代末,一次發(fā)生在20世紀(jì)70年代末至80年代初。論者們都借著馬克思的名義來(lái)說(shuō)話,而且都自以為抓住了馬克思的本意。但由于各自的前見不同,馬克思在他們那里便呈現(xiàn)出了斑駁的色彩。這些斑駁的色彩交互沖突,相互否定,為凸顯出一個(gè)真實(shí)的馬克思提供了某種契機(jī),同時(shí)也提示人們:在馬克思思想框架內(nèi)未必能獲得徹底解決的"不平衡關(guān)系"問(wèn)題,或許可以獲得另一種途徑的解決。
[Abstract]:On the issue of Marx's "unbalanced relationship", there have been two great debates in domestic academic circles: one occurred in the late 1950s and the other occurred from the late 1970s to the early 1980s. The commentators spoke in the name of Marx and thought they had grasped Marx's original intention. But because of their different foresight, Marx showed mottled color in them. These mottled color interactive conflicts and mutual negation provide some opportunity for highlighting a real Marx, and at the same time suggest that people may not be able to completely solve the problem of "unbalanced relationship" within the framework of Marx's thought. There may be another way to solve it.
【作者單位】： 河北師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I022

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱立元;藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)與物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)的不平衡關(guān)系——與張懷瑾同志商榷[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1982年01期

2 何國(guó)瑞;論物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)與藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)不平衡問(wèn)題[J];江漢論壇;1979年02期

3 陳竹;;藝術(shù)的曲線與經(jīng)濟(jì)的軸線——也談物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)與藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)不平衡問(wèn)題[J];江漢論壇;1980年02期

4 周忠厚;論藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)與物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)發(fā)展的宏觀平衡和微觀不平衡的辯證關(guān)系[J];江淮論壇;1983年06期

5 李基Q，

本文編號(hào)：2490108