【摘要】：本文以藝術(shù)人類學(xué)范式作為致思路徑,把復(fù)雜性思維融貫到實(shí)驗(yàn)性寫作的過程中,通過對(duì)納瓦霍社會(huì)的個(gè)案分析,試圖描述出納瓦霍社會(huì)“美”與文化的復(fù)雜關(guān)聯(lián),從而實(shí)現(xiàn)“美本質(zhì)問題”到“美問題”的轉(zhuǎn)換。 本文首先揭示了美本質(zhì)問題從“真問題”到“偽問題”的流變軌跡及研究范式的轉(zhuǎn)換必要;進(jìn)而提出了轉(zhuǎn)換的研究策略。其次,通過對(duì)“相對(duì)簡(jiǎn)單”的納瓦霍社會(huì)的追問,探討其“美”的機(jī)制及其思路。深入到納瓦霍社會(huì)的具體文化情境,試圖揭示其文化中與“美”密切相關(guān)的霍佐觀念的復(fù)雜內(nèi)涵,將中國(guó)的“和”及其相關(guān)的“氣與風(fēng)”的觀念作為比較參照。深入分析納瓦霍社會(huì)的“沙畫”與中國(guó)文化的“禮”的起源及其流變對(duì)各自文化中的“美”所具有的粘合性與規(guī)定性, 從而揭示了“美”與文化情境的復(fù)雜粘聯(lián)和互動(dòng)機(jī)制。 全文共三章。在《緒論》中,首先從分析學(xué)科現(xiàn)實(shí)與社會(huì)變遷入手談及美問題研究的當(dāng)代意義及其轉(zhuǎn)換必要;其次,從人的精神成長(zhǎng)史試圖揭示出美、藝術(shù)與“人”的深入關(guān)聯(lián)及其文化變遷,談及研究策略轉(zhuǎn)換的必要性;最后,從研究策略和方法的角度,分析了選擇納瓦霍作為個(gè)案研究的合理性。第一章通過對(duì)美問題追問的路徑淺描,呈現(xiàn)希臘傳統(tǒng)和中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的致思差異,并部分解答美本質(zhì)問題從“真問題”到“偽問題”的變遷奧秘;通過對(duì)五十年代美學(xué)大討論的研究,提出美本質(zhì)問題對(duì)中國(guó)當(dāng)代美學(xué)的重要性;通過描述蔣孔陽先生的美論特別是其對(duì)于“人與美”的復(fù)雜性的關(guān)注,揭示了美問題的復(fù)雜性及其當(dāng)代轉(zhuǎn)換的可能。第二章探討了與納瓦霍霍佐觀念密切相關(guān)的“氣與風(fēng)”,并比較分析了中國(guó)文化中的“氣與風(fēng)”觀念,尤其是從對(duì)“氣”的文化解讀中呈現(xiàn)了“美”與“禮”的情境相關(guān)性。第三章深入文化情境對(duì)霍佐進(jìn)行解讀,并描述了霍佐的復(fù)雜內(nèi)涵;同時(shí),通過對(duì)“禮”與“美”的解讀,嘗試性提出了“羊大人為美”,“羊人為美”與“羊大為美”的變遷軌跡和推定性時(shí)間。最后,對(duì)“霍佐”與美、“和”與美進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的描述性分析。 文章最后,根據(jù)納瓦霍的研究稍稍引申,表達(dá)了關(guān)于“美與人”的理想期待。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the paradigm of artistic anthropology as a way of thinking, melts complex thinking into the process of experimental writing, and tries to describe the complex connection between the "beauty" of Navajo society and culture through the case study of Navajo society. In order to achieve the "essence of beauty" to "beauty issues." This paper first reveals the evolution of the essence of beauty from "true problem" to "pseudo-problem" and the transformation of research paradigm is necessary, and then puts forward the research strategy of transformation. Secondly, by questioning Navajo's relatively simple society, the mechanism of beauty and its thinking are discussed. By going deep into the concrete cultural situation of Navajo society, this paper tries to reveal the complex connotation of Horzo's concept which is closely related to "beauty" in his culture, and makes a comparative reference to the Chinese "harmony" and its related "qi and wind". This paper deeply analyzes the origin of "sand painting" in Navajo society and the "ceremony" of Chinese culture and the conglutination and regulation of "beauty" in their respective cultures, thus revealing the complex mechanism of adhesion and interaction between "beauty" and cultural context. The full text consists of three chapters. In the introduction, we first discuss the contemporary significance of the study of beauty and the necessity of its transformation from the analysis of the reality of the subject and the social changes, and secondly, try to reveal the beauty from the history of human spiritual growth. The deep connection between art and "man" and its cultural changes, the necessity of changing research strategies, and the rationality of selecting Navajo as a case study are analyzed from the perspective of research strategies and methods. The first chapter shows the difference between Greek tradition and Chinese tradition through a brief description of the path to the question of beauty, and partly explains the changing mystery of the essence of beauty from "true problem" to "false problem". Through the study of the great discussion of aesthetics in the 1950s, this paper points out the importance of the essence of beauty to contemporary Chinese aesthetics, and by describing Mr. Jiang Kongyang's theory of beauty, especially his concern for the complexity of "man and beauty", It reveals the complexity of the beauty problem and the possibility of its contemporary transformation. The second chapter discusses "Qi and wind" which are closely related to Navajo jozo's concept, and compares and analyzes the concept of "qi and wind" in Chinese culture, especially the situational correlation between "beauty" and "propriety" in the cultural interpretation of Qi. The third chapter explains Hollow deeply in the cultural context, and describes the complex connotation of Hozzo. At the same time, through the interpretation of "Rites" and "Beauty", it tries to put forward "Goat adults as beauty". The vicissitude track and presumptive time of "Goat Man is Beautiful" and "Goat greatly Beautiful". Finally, the author makes a brief descriptive analysis of Horzo and beauty, and harmony and beauty. Finally, according to Navajo's research, it expresses the ideal expectation of beauty and people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：I01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣孔陽;建設(shè)文學(xué)理論新體系——評(píng)童慶炳的《文學(xué)活動(dòng)的審美維度》[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 鄭元者;美學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)性寫作的人類學(xué)依據(jù)[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

3 鄭元者;試論藝術(shù)起源研究中的歷史優(yōu)先性原則[J];江海學(xué)刊;1998年04期

4 章輝;實(shí)踐美學(xué):一段問題史[J];人文雜志;2004年04期

5 鄭元者;文學(xué)史研究中的歷史優(yōu)先性原則[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;1996年02期

6 蔣孔陽,鄭元者;關(guān)于馬克思主義人類學(xué)美學(xué)的思考[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?1997年02期

7 鄭元者;原始問題、學(xué)術(shù)忠誠(chéng)與美學(xué)生態(tài)重建[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2003年06期

8 徐碧輝;對(duì)五六十年代美學(xué)大討論的哲學(xué)反思[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年06期

9 趙敦華;哲學(xué)的“進(jìn)化論轉(zhuǎn)向”——再論西方哲學(xué)的危機(jī)和出路[J];哲學(xué)研究;2003年07期

10 鄭元者;藝術(shù)人類學(xué)立場(chǎng)與美學(xué)新思維[J];中文自學(xué)指導(dǎo);2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2260836