【摘要】：在中日近現(xiàn)代文學史上,有兩個不受重視的文學流派,它們分別是中國的鴛鴦蝴蝶派和日本的硯友社。這兩個流派雖然成就不是很高,但在傳統(tǒng)文學向現(xiàn)代文學的轉(zhuǎn)型過程中卻起到了先鋒和橋梁的作用。它們在文學實踐中所摸索的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)化道路以及它們所開創(chuàng)的現(xiàn)代休閑文學,通俗文學,消費文學等文學樣式,對今天的文學發(fā)展仍然具有借鑒意義。 這兩個流派的共同特點是強烈的懷舊情愫,大量地創(chuàng)作言情文學,不約而同地表現(xiàn)市民情結(jié),遠離政治而關注個人私生活；而且他們都敏銳地感受到了商業(yè)時代的到來,大量運用市場炒作方式,有效地依托于雜志起家,并且不失時機地借助大眾媒介,例如報紙刊物、戲劇改編、電影改編,來擴張自己的影響。同時,他們也為了適應市場的需要,大量地開創(chuàng)新型文體,例如日記體、書信體、心理小說等等。正因為通俗的文學主張以及由此而來的內(nèi)容的淺薄,他們遭遇了新興文學和進步文學的嚴厲批評。當然,由于中日社會狀況不同,國民心理不同、文化淵源不同,這就產(chǎn)生了兩個流派的重大區(qū)別,例如硯友社有著明確的文藝理論指導,他們的創(chuàng)作宗旨也就更加明確。而鴛鴦蝴蝶派抗議帝國主義侵略和殘酷的軍閥統(tǒng)治的等內(nèi)容,卻是硯友社從未涉及過的。 在本文中,筆者將采用比較文學的研究方法,對這兩個流派的生成過程、創(chuàng)作特色和它們同現(xiàn)代工業(yè)文明和商業(yè)社會的關系進行比較研究。通過比較中國鴛鴦蝴蝶派和日本的硯友社來揭示中國和日本兩國民族文學的異同,這對增強兩國民族文學之間的交流和促進兩國文學的共同繁榮有一定的積極作用。
[Abstract]:In the modern literature history of China and Japan, there are two literary schools which are not attached importance to, they are the Mandarin Duck and Butterfly School in China and the Yanyou Society in Japan. Although the achievement of these two schools is not very high, they play a vanguard and bridge role in the transition from traditional literature to modern literature. The road of cultural industrialization they have groped in literary practice and their literary styles of modern leisure literature, popular literature and consumer literature are still of great significance to the development of literature today. The common features of these two schools of thought are strong nostalgia, extensive writing of emotive literature, expression of civic complex in the same way, attention to personal private life away from politics, and they are keenly aware of the arrival of the commercial age. A great deal of market hype is used to build on magazines, and to expand their influence with the help of mass media, such as newspaper, drama and film. At the same time, in order to meet the needs of the market, they create a large number of new styles, such as diary, epistolary, psychological novels and so on. Because of popular literary claims and the resulting shallow content, they met with severe criticism from new and progressive literature. Of course, due to the different social conditions, different national psychology and different cultural origins, there are two major differences between the two schools, such as the Yanyou Society has a clear literary and artistic theory guidance, their creative purpose is more clear. But the Yuanyang and Butterfly faction protested imperialist aggression and cruel warlord rule, but it was never involved in Yanyou Society. In this paper, the author will adopt the method of comparative literature to make a comparative study on the formation process, creative characteristics and their relationship with modern industrial civilization and commercial society of these two schools. By comparing the Chinese Mandarin Duck and Butterfly School with the Yanyou Society of Japan, this paper reveals the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese national literature, which plays a positive role in enhancing the communication between the two countries' national literature and promoting the common prosperity of the two countries' literature.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：I0-03;I106

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前6條

1 任衛(wèi)平;中日文學交流史略談[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1994年01期

2 馬興國;;近代中日文學交流述略[J];日本研究;1992年02期

3 劉立善;;日本近代文壇首個文學社團——硯友社[J];日本研究;2008年02期

4 袁進;中日小說近代變革之比較[J];社會科學;1992年09期

5 孟慶樞;;日本啟蒙主義文藝思潮與中國近代文學[J];外國問題研究;1991年03期

6 王向遠;中國早期寫實主義文學的起源、演變與近代日本的寫實主義[J];中國文化研究;1995年04期

中國博士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前2條

1 楊國明;晚清小說與近代商業(yè)社會[D];上海師范大學;2003年

2 張登林;上海市民文化與現(xiàn)代通俗小說論[D];上海師范大學;2008年

中國碩士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前5條

1 湯正宇;從《小說畫報》到《星期》——“五四”時期通俗小說研究[D];上海師范大學;2004年

2 張洪濤;泛文化時代的來臨[D];浙江師范大學;2006年

3 肖霞;論清末民初文學文本中的“日化”現(xiàn)象[D];蘇州大學;2008年

4 劉佳;消閑娛樂：論鴛鴦蝴蝶派創(chuàng)作理論的形成及其內(nèi)涵[D];蘇州大學;2008年

5 吳麗麗;包天笑的都市生活與都市寫作[D];上海師范大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2208817