【摘要】：張隆溪認(rèn)為比較文學(xué)不能挾理論以自重而忽視文學(xué)本身,只有回歸文學(xué)的基本問(wèn)題才可能重新確立比較文學(xué)的學(xué)科價(jià)值,中國(guó)的比較文學(xué)研究者完全不必把時(shí)間和精力花費(fèi)在時(shí)髦理論的輸入和"學(xué)派"的建立上,應(yīng)該更多地專注于文學(xué)研究的基礎(chǔ)工作并努力為整個(gè)人文學(xué)界撰寫(xiě)出優(yōu)秀的著作,在此基礎(chǔ)上還要積極主動(dòng)地參與跨領(lǐng)域、跨語(yǔ)言和跨文化的對(duì)話與交流,只有如此才有可能獲得外界的廣泛承認(rèn)和真正尊重。
[Abstract]:Zhang Longxi thought that comparative literature could not be ignored by self-respect, and only the basic problem of returning to literature could the discipline value of comparative literature be re-established. Chinese researchers of comparative literature do not have to spend their time and energy on the input of fashionable theories and the establishment of "schools of thought", but should devote more attention to the basic work of literary research and strive to write excellent works for the entire literary world. On the basis of this, we should actively participate in the dialogue and communication across fields, languages and cultures, which is the only way to gain wide recognition and true respect from the outside world.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I0-03

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白杰;趙秦;;比較文學(xué)的發(fā)展與危機(jī)[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

2 Q冒參，

本文編號(hào)：2197745