探究朱光潛多元整合的思維模式及其在抗戰(zhàn)時期中國的實踐途徑
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-06 23:44
本文選題:多元整合 + 思維模式。 參考:《重慶師范大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文
【摘要】:朱光潛用“多元整合”作為方法論,跨學(xué)科地研究文學(xué)與心理學(xué)、哲學(xué)、美學(xué)等學(xué)科的深層關(guān)系,創(chuàng)造性地運用“多元整合的思維模式”不斷地進(jìn)行自身理論體系的建構(gòu)與調(diào)整,在這種“多元整合思維模式”的指導(dǎo)下開創(chuàng)了中國抗戰(zhàn)時期為謀求“中西合璧”后中國文學(xué)自由發(fā)展的實踐途徑!罢稀笔侵旃鉂摾碚摻(gòu)過程中所采用的一個主要手段,“多元”則是這種“整合”的范圍,它是在學(xué)科“邊緣化”后或者是對于某一問題該門學(xué)科不能作出令人滿意的或至少是不矛盾的解說的前提下提出的。朱光潛“多元”和“整合”的結(jié)合過程即是由“多元共生”到“多元合一”的變革過程。針對中西文化存在的根本差異,朱光潛運用創(chuàng)造性的誤讀來作為“多元整合”的前提條件。誤讀是有意的,創(chuàng)造的則是二者的“公因式”。朱光潛是“京派”的主要人物,他的“多元整合”的最終目的就是為了服從中國文學(xué)發(fā)展的總體要求,這也是抗戰(zhàn)前后,特別是30年代后期中國文學(xué)運動所表現(xiàn)出來的總趨勢。 本文將朱光潛有關(guān)文學(xué)、心理學(xué)、哲學(xué)、美學(xué)的方法論概括為“多元整合的方法論”,認(rèn)為在這一方法論的指導(dǎo)下產(chǎn)生了“多元整合的思維模式”。這一思維模式的形成背景和過程相當(dāng)復(fù)雜,既有中國新舊文學(xué)的影響,又有西方文學(xué)、心理學(xué)、哲學(xué)、美學(xué)的滲透,而美學(xué)始終是他所喜好的各門學(xué)科的聯(lián)絡(luò)線索和中介。正是有了美學(xué)的幫助,朱光潛便結(jié)合中西關(guān)于美感經(jīng)驗的研究,形成一種在“多元整合思維模式”下產(chǎn)生的思維意識——不即不離。有了這種思維意識,朱光潛在一種長期的理論探索中形成了“批判的綜合”的思維方式,這種思維方式也可稱作由“矛盾”到“融合”的思維過程。同時,在“多元整合思維模式”下還形成了朱光潛自己特有的“多元整合審美原則”——“理性節(jié)制”+“和諧靜穆”。他選擇了《文學(xué)雜志》作為后期“京派”文藝陣地的實踐途徑,同時又以《詩論》作為“中西合璧”的實踐途徑。在抗戰(zhàn)中他參加“文協(xié)”的工作,對他自己的理論進(jìn)行著檢驗,但最后又不得不倡導(dǎo)“脫俗”,以致被人指摘為“第三種人”。
[Abstract]:Zhu Guangqian uses "multiple integration" as a methodology to study the deep relationship between literature and psychology, philosophy, aesthetics, etc. Creative use of "multi-integrated thinking mode" to constantly construct and adjust their own theoretical system, Under the guidance of this "multi-conformity mode of thinking", a practical approach to the free development of Chinese literature in the period of China's Anti-Japanese War was initiated in order to seek the free development of Chinese literature after the "combination of Chinese and Western elements". "Integration" is one of the main methods used in the construction of Zhu Guangqian theory, and "pluralism" is the scope of "integration". It is put forward after the subject is "marginalized" or on the premise that the subject is not able to make satisfactory or at least contradictory explanations to a certain problem. The combination process of "multiple" and "integration" of Zhu Guangqian is a process of transformation from "pluralistic symbiosis" to "multi-in-one". In view of the fundamental differences between Chinese and western cultures, Zhu Guangqian uses creative misreading as a prerequisite for "pluralistic integration". Misreading is intentional and creating is the common cause of both. Zhu Guangqian is the main character of the "Beijing School". The ultimate purpose of his "pluralistic integration" is to satisfy the general requirements of the development of Chinese literature, which is also the general trend of the Chinese literary movement before and after the Anti-Japanese War, especially in the late 1930s. This paper generalizes Zhu Guangqian's methodology of literature, psychology, philosophy and aesthetics as "the methodology of multiple integration", and thinks that under the guidance of this methodology, "the mode of thinking of multiple integration" has emerged. The formation background and process of this mode of thinking is quite complicated, which has not only the influence of old and new Chinese literature, but also the infiltration of western literature, psychology, philosophy and aesthetics, and aesthetics has always been the contact clue and intermediary of various subjects he likes. It is with the help of aesthetics that Zhu Guangqian combines the study of aesthetic experience between China and the West, and forms a kind of thinking consciousness produced under the "multiple integrated thinking mode". With this kind of thinking consciousness, Zhu Guang has formed a "critical comprehensive" mode of thinking in his potential long-term theoretical exploration, which can also be called the thinking process from "contradiction" to "fusion". At the same time, under the "multiple integration thinking mode", Zhu Guangqian formed his own unique "multiple integration aesthetic principle"-"rational control", "harmony quiet." He chose "Literature Magazine" as the practical way of literary and artistic position in the later period of "Beijing School" and "poetic Theory" as the practical way of "combination of Chinese and Western elements" at the same time. In the War of Resistance, he took part in the work of "Literary Association", tested his own theory, but finally had to advocate "free from vulgarity", so that he was criticized as "the third kind of people".
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2005
【分類號】:I01
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 崔玲玲;西方文論中國化歷程中的朱光潛(1918-1949)[D];湖北大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:1988638
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yishull/1988638.html
最近更新
教材專著