本文選題：審美 + 審美文論��； 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2002年碩士論文

【摘要】： 審美文論是文學(xué)闡釋模式的一種，它認(rèn)為文學(xué)的基本特性是審美性，文學(xué)的基本價值是審美價值。本文對審美文論的批判，目的是理清其產(chǎn)生存在的根源和理論思路，探討它的理論貢獻(xiàn)和社會意義，并從學(xué)理上指出其過激之處，這有助于對文學(xué)闡釋模式做出合理的預(yù)測。 第一部分介紹審美文論產(chǎn)生的歷史文化語境。它是對“政治功利論”和“認(rèn)識—反映論”闡釋模式的反撥。同時深受20世紀(jì)西方文藝觀念的影響，也滲透著美學(xué)學(xué)科的品性。它的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)是西方的生命哲學(xué)、存在主義等人本主義思潮。 第二部分理清審美文論的理論思路。它從“文學(xué)情感性”、“審美反映論”、“自由的生命表現(xiàn)說”三個方面對“文學(xué)是什么”的本質(zhì)追問進(jìn)行了回答。在研究視角上，由它律轉(zhuǎn)向自律，重視語言形式的研究。而文學(xué)解釋學(xué)是它的方法論基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分探究審美文論的理論貢獻(xiàn)和社會意義。新時期人的啟蒙促使了文學(xué)的覺醒，文學(xué)的覺醒又是人的解放的重要組成部分。審美文論從情感性、無功利性、生命性三方面論證文學(xué)的自主地位，以作品為研究中心，，文藝學(xué)的整體結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)生變化。同時審美話語又是現(xiàn)代性的有機(jī)組成部分。 第四部分對審美文論進(jìn)行反思。它的理論危機(jī)有兩個表現(xiàn)：一是文學(xué)審美無功利性與文學(xué)審美功利性之間的矛盾；一是文學(xué)審美價值中心論和文學(xué)多元價值取向間的矛盾。出現(xiàn)此危機(jī)的原因有三個：一是將文學(xué)與審美等同；二是西方文化觀念的機(jī)械移植；三是二元對立的知性思維方式。它也不是對文學(xué)的全面解說，新的語境中文化研究才是文藝研究超越審美困境的途徑。這說明文學(xué)闡釋模式的與時俱進(jìn)性，也告誡我們對文學(xué)的解說應(yīng)保持高度歷史理性。
[Abstract]:Aesthetic literary theory is one of the modes of literary interpretation. It holds that the basic characteristic of literature is aesthetic and the basic value of literature is aesthetic value. The purpose of this article is to clarify the origin and theoretical thinking of aesthetic literary theory, to explore its theoretical contribution and social significance, and to point out its excesses in theory, which is helpful to make a reasonable prediction of literary interpretation model. The first part introduces the historical and cultural context of aesthetic literary theory. It is a backwash of the models of "political utilitarianism" and "Cognition-reflection Theory". At the same time, influenced by the western literary ideas in the 20 th century, it also permeates the character of aesthetics. Its philosophical basis is the western philosophy of life, existentialism and other humanism. The second part clarifies the theory of aesthetic literary theory. It answers the essence of what literature is from three aspects: literary emotion, aesthetic reflection theory and free life expression theory. From the perspective of the study, from the other law to self-discipline, pay attention to the study of language forms. Literary hermeneutics is the basis of its methodology. The third part explores the theoretical contribution and social significance of aesthetic literary theory. The enlightenment of people in the new period promotes the awakening of literature, and the awakening of literature is an important part of human liberation. Aesthetic literary theory demonstrates the independent position of literature from three aspects of emotion, non-utilitarianism and life, and takes the works as the research center, and the overall structure of literature and art changes. At the same time, aesthetic discourse is an organic part of modernity. The fourth part reflects on aesthetic literary theory. There are two manifestations of its theoretical crisis: one is the contradiction between literary aesthetic non-utilitarianism and literary aesthetic utilitarianism, the other is the contradiction between literary aesthetic value-centeredness and literary multi-value orientation. There are three reasons for this crisis: one is to equate literature with aesthetics, the other is to transplant the concept of western culture mechanically, and the third is to think in a dualistic way of thinking. It is not a comprehensive explanation of literature, and cultural study in the new context is the way to transcend aesthetic dilemmas. This shows that the mode of literary interpretation keeps pace with the times and warns us that we should maintain a high degree of historical rationality in the interpretation of literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號】：I01

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張昕;“五四”的延續(xù)—從“第五代導(dǎo)演”思想看80年代啟蒙運(yùn)動[D];海南大學(xué);2012年

2 李娜;20世紀(jì)80年代文學(xué)人類本體論研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1850061