本文選題：等效翻譯 + 合作原則　； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2004年碩士論文

【摘要】：翻譯活動(dòng)至少要涉及兩種語(yǔ)言文化傳統(tǒng)，因而如何理解原語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用涵義和文化特征，如何用最貼切的翻譯策略使之成功地反映在譯文中，這是任何成功的翻譯者必須解決的根本問(wèn)題。這些問(wèn)題的范圍、性質(zhì)、難易度會(huì)因兩種語(yǔ)言文化的差異而有所不同。在漫長(zhǎng)的翻譯史中，人們圍繞這些問(wèn)題在理論和實(shí)踐兩方面進(jìn)行了不懈的研究，就翻譯的性質(zhì)、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、內(nèi)容、可譯性等問(wèn)題做出了界定，就如何做到成功翻譯提出了各種理論，探討了許多卓有成效的策略技巧。盡管翻譯學(xué)是一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科，但它并不是孤立發(fā)展的，而是不斷從其他學(xué)科尤其是語(yǔ)言學(xué)，吸取理論來(lái)充實(shí)壯大自己，因而幾乎每一種語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論都會(huì)產(chǎn)生一種相應(yīng)的翻譯理論。本文即借鑒語(yǔ)用學(xué)理論中的涵義理論來(lái)探討如何實(shí)現(xiàn)文學(xué)翻譯的語(yǔ)用等效。 翻譯的等效問(wèn)題是現(xiàn)代翻譯研究中頗具爭(zhēng)論性的一個(gè)議題，奈達(dá)、卡特福德等諸多翻譯家和翻譯理論家都對(duì)其提出過(guò)定義，但在其內(nèi)涵及實(shí)現(xiàn)程度上卻各有異同，爭(zhēng)論不休。本文認(rèn)為“等效”絕不是數(shù)學(xué)意義上的簡(jiǎn)單“等值”或“等同”，而是一個(gè)涉及到語(yǔ)言文化等各個(gè)層面的涵義豐富的概念，翻譯者所追求的也不是絕對(duì)的等值，而是最大限度的使譯文讀者對(duì)譯文的理解與原文讀者對(duì)原文的理解盡可能一致，這種“一致”的效果只能是相對(duì)的而不是絕對(duì)的，，因而等效翻譯只能是一種相對(duì)的概念而不是絕對(duì)的概念。 本文簡(jiǎn)單回顧了中西方翻譯理論特別是等效理論的發(fā)展，在對(duì)其對(duì)比分析之后，本文指出要使涵義寬泛的等效理論在翻譯實(shí)踐和翻譯評(píng)價(jià)中更具操作性，必須找到一個(gè)切入點(diǎn)，而在文學(xué)翻譯中，翻譯者面臨的最大障礙就是如何正確理解源語(yǔ)的隱含意義并在譯文中恰如其分的表達(dá)出來(lái)。本文認(rèn)為在文學(xué)翻譯中運(yùn)用格賴斯的合作原則可以最大限度保證原文作者與譯語(yǔ)讀者之間的“合作”，即讓譯語(yǔ)讀者最大可能體會(huì)原文作者發(fā)出的信息，本原則中的含義理論正是如何理解會(huì)話含義即語(yǔ)用意義。本文對(duì)合作原則的內(nèi)容、語(yǔ)用意義的獲得及合作原則在文學(xué)翻譯中的可行性進(jìn)行了討論，并對(duì)以往的翻譯標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、翻譯原則作了分析比較，最后提出了語(yǔ)用等效的翻譯標(biāo)準(zhǔn)：利用含義理論等語(yǔ)用學(xué)原理，實(shí)現(xiàn)語(yǔ)用意義的等效。本文認(rèn)為語(yǔ)用等效既是實(shí)現(xiàn)等效翻譯的良好途徑，也是衡量翻譯優(yōu)劣的切實(shí)可行的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 本文正是以等效原則和含義理論作為理論基礎(chǔ)，從如何獲得原文的語(yǔ)用意義、如 何理解原文的語(yǔ)用意義及如何在譯文中體現(xiàn)原文的語(yǔ)用意義三個(gè)方面對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)文學(xué)翻 譯中語(yǔ)用意義的等效進(jìn)行了較為細(xì)致的探討，并對(duì)語(yǔ)用意義的等效原則分析論證，通 過(guò)諸多例子論述了這一原則對(duì)翻譯實(shí)踐和譯文評(píng)價(jià)的指導(dǎo)作用。 本文只對(duì)語(yǔ)用等效原則進(jìn)行了初步探討，仍有許多問(wèn)題值得進(jìn)一步討論，比如接 受者這一概念，等效論要求譯者充分考慮接受者的效果，那么譯者有沒(méi)有必要去考慮 每一個(gè)具體的接受者?再如如何劃定“效果”和“譯文對(duì)接受者的作用”及“接受者 對(duì)譯文的反映”三者的界限?如何深入的理論論證語(yǔ)用意義的等效是翻譯等效的基 礎(chǔ)?因此，隨著人們對(duì)翻譯理論的深入研究，會(huì)對(duì)這一原則提出許多異議，但正是這 些異議的提出和解決才使得它不斷完善。 關(guān)鍵詞:等效翻譯;合作原則;語(yǔ)用意義;語(yǔ)用等效原則 分類號(hào):HO59 Vll
[Abstract]:The translation activities should involve at least two linguistic and cultural traditions , so how to understand the pragmatic meaning and cultural characteristics of the primitive , and how to use the most appropriate translation strategies to reflect the fundamental problems that translators must solve . In the long translation history , there are various theories on how to achieve successful translation .








The equivalence of translation is one of the most controversial issues in modern translation studies , and many translators and theorists of translation theorists , such as Nida and Kateford , have put forward their definitions , but there are differences and arguments in their content and realization , but rather than absolute equivalence in the meaning and realization of translation , the effect of translation is only relative rather than absolute , so the equivalent translation can only be a relative concept rather than an absolute concept .








This paper briefly reviews the development of Chinese and Western translation theories , especially the equivalence theory , and points out that it is necessary to find a breakthrough point in the translation practice and translation evaluation .

















This paper is based on the theory of equivalence principle and meaning , how to obtain the pragmatic meaning of the original text , such as








How to understand the pragmatic meaning of the original text and how to embody the pragmatic meaning of the original text in the translation








The equivalence of pragmatic meaning in translation is discussed in detail , and the equivalence principle of pragmatic meaning is analyzed and demonstrated .








This paper discusses the guiding role of this principle in translation practice and translation evaluation .








In this paper , only the pragmatic equivalence principle is discussed , and there are still many problems to be discussed further , for example








The concept of acceptor , the equivalent theory requires the translator to take full account of the effect of the recipient , then does the translator need to consider








Each specific recipient ? Re - define the effect of " effect " and " translation - to - recipient " and " recipient " The equivalence of the meaning of pragmatic meaning is the basis of translation equivalence .








Therefore , with the further study of the theory of translation , there are many objections to this principle , but it is this








The raising and resolution of some objections made it perfect .








Keywords : equivalent translation ; principle of cooperation ; pragmatic meaning ; pragmatic equivalence principle








Cat . No . : HO59








Vll

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：I046

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 徐盛桓;含意推導(dǎo)思維形態(tài)的變化和發(fā)展[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊(黑龍江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));1998年01期

本文編號(hào)：1825849