本文關(guān)鍵詞： 文學(xué)生態(tài)學(xué) 隱喻 精神圈 文學(xué)與政治 文學(xué)與意識形態(tài) 文學(xué)與經(jīng)濟　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2004年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：生態(tài)學(xué)是研究有機體與其環(huán)境相互作用的科學(xué)。它是隨著人們對環(huán)境危機日益關(guān)注迅速發(fā)展起來的。作為思想史的范式，，生態(tài)學(xué)已經(jīng)越過學(xué)科邊界，擴展到政治、法律、經(jīng)濟、哲學(xué)、倫理、美學(xué)等領(lǐng)域，形成了“泛生態(tài)學(xué)化”的態(tài)勢。 本論文中所稱的“文學(xué)生態(tài)學(xué)”，是文學(xué)的生態(tài)學(xué)隱喻(metaphor)，即用生態(tài)學(xué)的方法來觀察、研究和解釋文學(xué)以及文學(xué)與“文學(xué)的環(huán)境”(精神圈)之間的關(guān)系。 生態(tài)學(xué)是關(guān)于復(fù)雜性的科學(xué)。文學(xué)的生態(tài)學(xué)的隱喻，意味著我們應(yīng)當重新認識文學(xué)和文學(xué)理論的復(fù)雜性：1．文學(xué)的關(guān)系性。文學(xué)是處于它的環(huán)境之中的，文學(xué)是人類精神家族(如政治、意識形態(tài)、經(jīng)濟、文化、社會等)中的一個分支。它與“環(huán)境”之間不斷地進行符號性的交換。文學(xué)沒有先驗的本質(zhì)，它的本質(zhì)只能存在于它與“環(huán)境”的關(guān)系之中。2．文學(xué)的有機性。我們應(yīng)當把文學(xué)看作是類生命的對象。文學(xué)是一個生長、發(fā)育和進化的過程。文學(xué)通過母題、敘事學(xué)結(jié)構(gòu)、經(jīng)典(顯性的)和成規(guī)(隱性的)來實現(xiàn)自己的“遺傳性”。3．文學(xué)的整體性。無論是文學(xué)作品本身(形式和內(nèi)容)還是文學(xué)活動的各個方面(創(chuàng)作、閱讀、批評)，都應(yīng)當作為一個整體進行研究，而不是將他們肢解為互不關(guān)聯(lián)的散沙。 本論文強調(diào)，文學(xué)生態(tài)學(xué)是文學(xué)的生態(tài)學(xué)隱喻，但是，隱喻并不是模糊，因為我們的普通概念系統(tǒng)基本上是隱喻的。在生態(tài)學(xué)的隱喻之下，進一步論述了文學(xué)的關(guān)系性、有機性和整體性。 本論文論述了文學(xué)與政治的回環(huán)關(guān)系。文學(xué)與政治都是人類的符號行為，因此二者構(gòu)成了超循環(huán)同構(gòu)關(guān)系。政治的合法性前提是由文學(xué)的虛構(gòu)和敘事建構(gòu)的。文學(xué)以對政治無意識的顯現(xiàn)和戲仿對政治發(fā)生“爭辯”的關(guān)系。文學(xué)通過“政治文化”來編寫公民的政治“腳本”。政治則通過對文學(xué)的經(jīng)典化過程的干預(yù)，實現(xiàn)其對文學(xué)的宰制。 本論文討論了文學(xué)與意識形態(tài)的錯綜關(guān)系。通過文本的征候閱讀，借鑒人類學(xué)關(guān)于儀式和典禮的理論，本文試圖說明意識形態(tài)是如何經(jīng)由文本與實踐進行再生產(chǎn)的，同時還探討了文本中各種意識形態(tài)的糾合與沖突關(guān)系。 本論文討論了文學(xué)與經(jīng)濟的協(xié)同與頡頏關(guān)系。文學(xué)一般地是由經(jīng)濟主導(dǎo)的，但是，文學(xué)也可以維護或者批判社會生產(chǎn)方式的意識形態(tài)。文學(xué)與經(jīng)濟的關(guān)系還有3種形式：不平衡、斷裂與互滲。文學(xué)應(yīng)當表達人們在經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域中“內(nèi)在的道德關(guān)照”，促進穩(wěn)態(tài)經(jīng)濟的生 成，實現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟、社會與文化的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展. 文學(xué)生態(tài)學(xué)關(guān)注精神圈各學(xué)科的協(xié)同、互滲，最終能夠促進生活世界各領(lǐng)域的協(xié)調(diào)和 諧。
[Abstract]:Ecology is a science that studies the interaction between organisms and their environment. It develops rapidly as people pay more and more attention to the environmental crisis. As a paradigm in the history of thought, ecology has crossed the discipline boundary and expanded to politics, law, economy, Philosophy, ethics, aesthetics and other fields, formed a "pan-ecological" situation. The term "literary ecology" in this thesis is the ecological metaphor of literature, that is, to observe, study and explain literature and the relationship between literature and "the environment of literature" (spiritual circle) by ecological method. Ecology is the science of complexity. The ecological metaphor of literature means that we should re-understand the complexity of literature and literary theory: 1.The relationship of literature. Literature is in its environment. Literature is a branch of the human spiritual family (such as politics, ideology, economy, culture, society, etc.). There is a constant exchange of symbols between literature and "environment". Literature has no priori nature. Its essence can only exist in its relationship with "environment" .2. the organic nature of literature. We should regard literature as the object of quasi-life. Literature is a process of growth, development and evolution. Classical (explicit) and stereotypical (implicit) to achieve their own "heredity" .3.Literary integrity. Whether it is the literary work itself (form and content) or all aspects of literary activities (creation, reading, reading, reading), Criticism should be studied as a whole, not disjointed as disconnected sand. This thesis emphasizes that literary ecology is the ecological metaphor of literature, but metaphor is not vague, because our general conceptual system is basically metaphorical. Organic and holistic. This paper discusses the relationship between literature and politics. Both literature and politics are symbolic behaviors of human beings. Therefore, the two constitute hypercyclic isomorphism. The premise of political legitimacy is constructed by literary fiction and narration. Literature "argues" with the appearance of political unconscious and parody of politics. Political culture is used to write political "scripts" for citizens. Politics interferes with the process of literary canonization. To realize its domination of literature. This paper discusses the complex relationship between literature and ideology. By reading the texts and drawing lessons from anthropological theories on rituals and ceremonies, this paper attempts to explain how ideology is reproduced through text and practice. At the same time, it also discusses the relationship between various ideologies and conflicts in the text. This paper discusses the synergy and antagonism between literature and economy. Generally speaking, literature is dominated by economy, but, Literature can also maintain or criticize the ideology of social production. There are three forms of the relationship between literature and economy: imbalance, Fracture and infiltration. Literature should express people's "inner moral concern" in the economic field, and promote the growth of steady economy. To realize the harmonious development of economy, society and culture. Literary ecology pays close attention to the synergy and mutual permeation of various disciplines in the spiritual circle, which can eventually promote the coordination and coordination of the various fields of life. Harmonic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：I0-05

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 彭文忠;;消費時代湖南文學(xué)研究的文學(xué)生態(tài)學(xué)視角[J];湖南商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王長順;生態(tài)學(xué)視野下的西漢文學(xué)研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 段致軍;《一九八四》中溫斯頓精神歷程的生態(tài)學(xué)解讀[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1513610