本文關(guān)鍵詞： 文學(xué)范式 范式理論 哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ) 漢語(yǔ)思維　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：“文學(xué)范式”是當(dāng)今學(xué)界在文學(xué)研究中較為通行的術(shù)語(yǔ)。這一術(shù)語(yǔ)的出現(xiàn),是當(dāng)代學(xué)界對(duì)西方理論譯介的結(jié)果。因此,“文學(xué)范式”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)既具有西方哲學(xué)的內(nèi)涵,又具有中國(guó)方法論的特色。但在對(duì)這一術(shù)語(yǔ)的具體運(yùn)用中,稍加考察便可以發(fā)現(xiàn)對(duì)它的使用具有一種眾說(shuō)紛紜的狀況。這一狀況的存在,表明我們對(duì)文學(xué)理論術(shù)語(yǔ)缺乏相應(yīng)的反思。任何一個(gè)理論術(shù)語(yǔ)都必須具有相應(yīng)的意義規(guī)定和適用范圍,否則,對(duì)理論術(shù)語(yǔ)的隨意生造和使用,會(huì)掩蓋理論發(fā)展的線索和深度。有鑒于此,本文試圖考察“文學(xué)范式”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)的來(lái)龍去脈和哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ),希望以此作為深入地思考當(dāng)代中國(guó)文藝?yán)碚摻?gòu)的契機(jī)。 本文共分為四章。第一章通過(guò)對(duì)庫(kù)恩“范式理論”的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)梳理和考察,來(lái)指出“范式理論”能夠在不同學(xué)科之間移植使用的理論依據(jù)何在。第二章則考察姚斯在接受美學(xué)的相關(guān)理論中對(duì)庫(kù)恩“范式理論”的借鑒和發(fā)揮,以及我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)接受美學(xué)的譯介,促成了“文學(xué)范式”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)的形成。第三章通過(guò)分析接受美學(xué)和范式理論的共同性,并引入哲學(xué)解釋學(xué)作為第三方參照系,由此說(shuō)明接受美學(xué)和范式理論在理論基礎(chǔ)上的一種隱含的一致:既建立在哲學(xué)解釋學(xué)對(duì)語(yǔ)言問(wèn)題的討論和認(rèn)識(shí),又建立在一種全新的歷史觀念上。第四章則專(zhuān)門(mén)探討“文學(xué)范式”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)所蘊(yùn)含的漢語(yǔ)思維。通過(guò)西方思維和漢語(yǔ)思維的比較,指出“文學(xué)范式”這一術(shù)語(yǔ)形成的內(nèi)在機(jī)制,實(shí)際上是我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)西方理論作出的反應(yīng),這是當(dāng)代中國(guó)文學(xué)理論建設(shè)的必由之路。但無(wú)論如何,這種建構(gòu)都不能以忽略理論自身的局限性和適用性為代價(jià)。 因此,只有從對(duì)理論術(shù)語(yǔ)的歷史淵源進(jìn)行溯源探討,并對(duì)其哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)保持一種敏銳的反思,我們才能認(rèn)識(shí)清楚這一局限性所在。這一局限性的存在不是片面的、孤立的。因?yàn)檫@一局限性也許恰恰就是我國(guó)文學(xué)理論的特色所在,只不過(guò)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)被西方文論的影響和傳播掩蓋了而已。
[Abstract]:"Literary Paradigm" is a relatively common term in literary studies. The emergence of this term is the result of the translation of Western theories by contemporary scholars. The term "literary paradigm" has not only the connotation of western philosophy but also the characteristics of Chinese methodology. After a little investigation, we can find that there are different opinions about the use of it. This situation exists. It shows that we lack the corresponding reflection on the literary theoretical terms. Any theoretical term must have the corresponding meaning and scope of application, otherwise, the random creation and use of the theoretical terms. In view of this, this paper attempts to examine the origin and philosophical basis of the term "literary paradigm". Hope to take this as an opportunity to think deeply about the construction of contemporary Chinese literature and art theory. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter combs and inspects the philosophical basis of Kuhn's Paradigm Theory. To point out that "paradigm theory" can be transplanted between different disciplines of the theoretical basis. The second chapter is to examine Yao in the reception aesthetics in the relevant theory of Kuhn's "paradigm theory" reference and play. The translation of reception aesthetics in Chinese academic circles has contributed to the formation of the term "literary paradigm". Chapter three analyzes the commonality of reception aesthetics and paradigm theory, and introduces philosophical hermeneutics as a third party reference system. This explains the implicit consistency of reception aesthetics and paradigm theory on the basis of theory: it is based on the discussion and understanding of language in philosophical hermeneutics. Chapter 4th is devoted to the discussion of the Chinese thinking contained in the term "Literary Paradigm" and the comparison between Western thinking and Chinese thinking. It is pointed out that the internal mechanism of the formation of the term "literary paradigm" is actually the reaction of Chinese academic circles to western theories, which is the only way to construct contemporary Chinese literary theories. This construction cannot be done at the expense of neglecting the limitations and applicability of the theory itself. Therefore, only from the historical origin of theoretical terms to explore the origin, and its philosophical basis to maintain a keen reflection. We can understand this limitation clearly. The existence of this limitation is not one-sided, isolated, because this limitation may be precisely the characteristics of Chinese literary theory. It is only obscured by the influence and spread of western literary theory for a long time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I045

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金元浦;;文藝學(xué)的問(wèn)題意識(shí)與文化轉(zhuǎn)向[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 鄭杭生,李霞;關(guān)于庫(kù)恩的“范式”——一種科學(xué)哲學(xué)與社會(huì)學(xué)交叉的視角[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期

3 梅新林;;文化視野中的文學(xué)演變研究[J];河北學(xué)刊;2009年02期

4 陳廣宏;;中國(guó)文學(xué)古今演變:本土與西方維度[J];河北學(xué)刊;2009年02期

5 陳文新;甘宏偉;;古今文學(xué)演變與中國(guó)文學(xué)史研究[J];河北學(xué)刊;2009年02期

6 葛永海;;文學(xué)古今演變的臨界點(diǎn)之辨[J];河北學(xué)刊;2009年02期

7 孫鵬宇;;庫(kù)恩“范式”的人文價(jià)值[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年11期

8 林學(xué)俊;試論庫(kù)恩的范式及其在科學(xué)認(rèn)識(shí)中的作用[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)與辯證法;1997年01期

9 張永剛;庫(kù)恩的“范式”與中國(guó)當(dāng)代文學(xué)理論[J];曲靖師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

10 李兆前;;雷蒙德·威廉斯的文學(xué)范式思考[J];世界文學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張海林;庫(kù)恩范式的解釋學(xué)維度[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

2 宋顏莉;范式建構(gòu)：余英時(shí)“新典范說(shuō)”對(duì)傳統(tǒng)紅學(xué)研究方法論的突破[D];西南交通大學(xué);2007年

3 張莉;庫(kù)恩范式理論的方法論意義[D];西北大學(xué);2008年

4 楊斌;庫(kù)恩“范式”的演變及其應(yīng)用研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1444864