新歷史主義視角下的《理查三世》
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-01 08:46
【摘要】：威廉·莎士比亞（William Shakespeare，1564-1616）是全世界最偉大的詩人和劇作家之一。其所有作品包括38部戲劇、154首十四行詩以及2首敘事長詩。其中歷史劇有十部，約占其戲劇總數(shù)的三分之一。《理查三世》大約創(chuàng)作于1593年，其原名為《理查三世的悲劇》The Tragedy of King Richard the Third。該劇描寫了從1471年亨利六世去世至1485年理查滅亡這14年的故事，展現(xiàn)了理查從謀求皇位到加冕直至最后戰(zhàn)死于布華斯戰(zhàn)場（Bosworth Field）的過程。 本文由導(dǎo)論、結(jié)論以及四個主體部分構(gòu)成。第一章擬探究莎劇《理查三世》最初的史料來源——即托馬斯.莫爾的《理查三世史》。通過還原托馬斯.莫爾創(chuàng)作《理查三世史》的歷史語境，展示出莫爾是從自己的立場和角度出發(fā)，有所選擇的記錄和建構(gòu)了歷史文本。第二章擬探究莎劇《理查三世》與其史料來源的關(guān)系。通過考證該劇與史料記錄的差異，，展示出莎士比亞也同樣基于自己的立場和觀點，參與了歷史的建構(gòu)。經(jīng)第一、二章的探究，從而指出“歷史的文本性。”第三章擬探討該劇與伊麗莎白一世統(tǒng)治最后十年政治時局的關(guān)系。通過將劇本中鮮明的派系斗爭、政客之間爭權(quán)奪利的主題與當(dāng)時政治事件、政治人物爭斗格局相并置，指出該文本與當(dāng)時政治時局的相互影響、相互建構(gòu)。第四章則進一步探討該劇主人公理查三世、與當(dāng)時政局中風(fēng)云人物羅伯特·塞西爾的相似和契合，展示出文學(xué)文本對歷史、政治和文化的建構(gòu)。經(jīng)第三、四章的探討，從而揭示出“文本的歷史性。”基于主體部分的分析，本文擬得出這樣的結(jié)論：《理查三世》是一部“文本”與“歷史”相互交融的作品，它既被歷史所塑造又塑造著歷史。表面上該劇是一部述說英格蘭過去歷史的戲劇，但實際上劇中包含著許多當(dāng)時政治時局的因素，揭示出伊麗莎白一世統(tǒng)治最后十年間復(fù)雜的政治斗爭。莎士比亞敏銳地捕捉到了當(dāng)時政局的特征，并在劇中展示出自己的政治立場。莎氏在述說過往歷史的同時，也干預(yù)了其創(chuàng)作當(dāng)下的歷史。
[Abstract]:William Shakespeare,1564-1616 is one of the greatest poets and playwrights in the world. All his works include 38 dramas, 154 sonnets and 2 long narrative poems. There are ten historical dramas, accounting for about 1/3 of the total number of plays. Richard III was written around 1593, formerly known as the tragedy of Richard III. The Tragedy of King Richard the Third. The play describes the 14 years between Henry VI's death in 1471 and Richard's death in 1485. It shows Richard's progress from seeking the throne to being crowned until he finally died in the Battle of Buvas. This paper consists of an introduction, a conclusion and four main parts. The first chapter will explore the original historical source of Shakespeare's play Richard III, that is Thomas. Moore's History of Richard III. By restoring Thomas. The historical context of Moore's creation of the History of Richard III shows that Moore selectively recorded and constructed the historical text from his own standpoint and angle. The second chapter explores the relationship between Shakespeare's play Richard III and its historical sources. Through textual research on the difference between the play and historical records, it shows that Shakespeare also participated in the construction of history on the basis of his own stand and viewpoint. After the first and second chapters of the inquiry, it points out that "the text of history." The third chapter discusses the relationship between the play and the political situation in the last ten years of Elizabeth I's reign. By combining the distinct factional struggle, the theme of power struggle among politicians with the political events of the time and the pattern of political figures' struggle, the author points out that the text and the political situation at that time influence each other and construct each other. The fourth chapter further discusses the similarities and consonance between Richard III, the protagonist of the play, and Robert Cecil, a figure in the political situation at that time, and shows the construction of history, politics and culture in the literary texts. Through the discussion of the third and fourth chapters, it reveals the historical nature of the text. Based on the analysis of the main part, this paper draws such a conclusion: Richard III is a "text" and "history" intermingled with each other, it is not only shaped by history but also shaped by history. On the face of it, the play is a drama about the history of England, but in fact it contains many factors of the political situation at that time, revealing the complicated political struggle during the last ten years of Elizabeth I's reign. Shakespeare acutely captured the characteristics of the political situation at that time and displayed his political position in the play. While telling the past history, she also interfered with the present history of his creation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外語學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I561.073
本文編號：2216676
[Abstract]:William Shakespeare,1564-1616 is one of the greatest poets and playwrights in the world. All his works include 38 dramas, 154 sonnets and 2 long narrative poems. There are ten historical dramas, accounting for about 1/3 of the total number of plays. Richard III was written around 1593, formerly known as the tragedy of Richard III. The Tragedy of King Richard the Third. The play describes the 14 years between Henry VI's death in 1471 and Richard's death in 1485. It shows Richard's progress from seeking the throne to being crowned until he finally died in the Battle of Buvas. This paper consists of an introduction, a conclusion and four main parts. The first chapter will explore the original historical source of Shakespeare's play Richard III, that is Thomas. Moore's History of Richard III. By restoring Thomas. The historical context of Moore's creation of the History of Richard III shows that Moore selectively recorded and constructed the historical text from his own standpoint and angle. The second chapter explores the relationship between Shakespeare's play Richard III and its historical sources. Through textual research on the difference between the play and historical records, it shows that Shakespeare also participated in the construction of history on the basis of his own stand and viewpoint. After the first and second chapters of the inquiry, it points out that "the text of history." The third chapter discusses the relationship between the play and the political situation in the last ten years of Elizabeth I's reign. By combining the distinct factional struggle, the theme of power struggle among politicians with the political events of the time and the pattern of political figures' struggle, the author points out that the text and the political situation at that time influence each other and construct each other. The fourth chapter further discusses the similarities and consonance between Richard III, the protagonist of the play, and Robert Cecil, a figure in the political situation at that time, and shows the construction of history, politics and culture in the literary texts. Through the discussion of the third and fourth chapters, it reveals the historical nature of the text. Based on the analysis of the main part, this paper draws such a conclusion: Richard III is a "text" and "history" intermingled with each other, it is not only shaped by history but also shaped by history. On the face of it, the play is a drama about the history of England, but in fact it contains many factors of the political situation at that time, revealing the complicated political struggle during the last ten years of Elizabeth I's reign. Shakespeare acutely captured the characteristics of the political situation at that time and displayed his political position in the play. While telling the past history, she also interfered with the present history of his creation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外語學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I561.073
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 騰超男;;女性的悲歌——《理查三世》中安夫人的“替罪羊”形象解析[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期
2 楊曉蓮;超越中的悲劇人物——試論《理查三世》的悲劇性[J];外國文學(xué)研究;1993年03期
3 莫運平;;身體丑陋與靈魂罪惡——理查三世身體的文化解讀[J];燕山大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期
本文編號：2216676
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2216676.html
