【摘要】：正從文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)的視域考察小說的生成、發(fā)展與社會(huì)文化的深層關(guān)聯(lián),是小說社會(huì)學(xué)研究的主要內(nèi)容。歐洲的文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué),在經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義、理性主義和自康德以來古典哲學(xué)的思想體系中,可粗略地劃分為經(jīng)驗(yàn)實(shí)證主義的文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)和辯證的文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué),而這兩種方法大多數(shù)時(shí)候處于一種對(duì)峙的狀態(tài)。這些文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)方法對(duì)于發(fā)掘小說生成的社會(huì)諸要素,以及從哲學(xué)層面論證小說生成何以可能,都具有非常重要的方法論意義。一、文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)研究的兩個(gè)向度當(dāng)前的文學(xué)研究存在著兩種維度:一種是共時(shí)型的,或如新批評(píng)那樣只是關(guān)心文本的語言的"復(fù)義"或"含混";或者在假定的超歷史的理論平面上,對(duì)文學(xué)史上可經(jīng)驗(yàn)觀察到的各種
[Abstract]:It is the main content of the study of the sociology of fiction to examine the generation, development and social culture of the novel from the perspective of literary sociology. European literary sociology, in the system of empiricism, rationalism and classical philosophy since Kant, can be roughly divided into empirical positivism and dialectical literary sociology. Most of the time these two methods are in a state of confrontation. These literary sociological methods are of great methodological significance in exploring the social elements of fiction generation and in demonstrating the possibility of novel formation from the philosophical level. First, there are two dimensions in the study of literature sociology: one is synchronic, the other is synchronic. Or, as new criticism is concerned only with the "repetition" or "ambiguity" of the language of the text; or, on the hypothetical transcendental theoretical plane, all sorts of experiential observations in the history of literature
【作者單位】： 南陽師范學(xué)院文學(xué)院;
【基金】：南陽師范學(xué)院專項(xiàng)項(xiàng)目《西方資本主義文化背景下的小說社會(huì)學(xué)方法研究——以盧卡奇、瓦特、戈德曼為中心》(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):ZX2012004)的階段性成果 2012年度國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金西部項(xiàng)目(12XZW042)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4
，

本文編號(hào)：2216592