本文選題：模糊性 + 權(quán)力　； 參考：《浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：《失樂園》是由十七世紀(jì)的英國詩人約翰?彌爾頓所著的一篇史詩性詩歌。彌爾頓選取了一段圣經(jīng)故事作為詩歌的主要內(nèi)容,在《失樂園》中闡述了人類祖先亞當(dāng)和夏娃受墮落天使撒旦的誘惑背叛上帝,最終被逐出伊甸園的經(jīng)過。 本文運(yùn)用燕卜蓀的相關(guān)理論闡述彌爾頓《失樂園》中的模糊性。在燕卜蓀的《復(fù)義七形》中,他將模糊性共分為七種類型。而《失樂園》中所產(chǎn)生的模糊性分別屬于燕卜蓀所定義的第六種和第七種模糊性:上帝意象,撒旦意象的塑造所產(chǎn)生模糊性屬于第七種模糊性,因?yàn)槭怯缮舷挛乃?guī)定的相矛盾的兩種描述同時(shí)應(yīng)用在一個(gè)形象的塑造上;而《圣經(jīng)》和希臘羅馬神話糅合所產(chǎn)生的模糊性屬于第六種模糊,因?yàn)閮蓚�(gè)不相關(guān)的文化體系的融合勢必形成模糊。在此部分中,部分文本將會(huì)被引用來分析文中模糊性的表現(xiàn)。除了對模糊性的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行分析以外,誘其形成的歷史根源也將運(yùn)用新歷史主義作為方法論進(jìn)行細(xì)致分析。新歷史主義學(xué)家認(rèn)為文學(xué)作品帶有政治維度,是權(quán)力和顛覆協(xié)商的最終產(chǎn)物。而經(jīng)過深入分析,可以得出《失樂園》中的模糊性正是權(quán)力(以彌爾頓時(shí)期的政治背景和宗教為代表)和顛覆(以彌爾頓自己對自由的追求和宗教詮釋為代表)協(xié)商的最終產(chǎn)物。此外,由《失樂園》中的模糊性所反映的彌爾頓的意識形態(tài)也在此闡述總結(jié)。 本文在結(jié)論中稍有提及新歷史主義中的“互文性”,以求除了對模糊性的研究之外,可以再次肯定《失樂園》的重要地位。
[Abstract]:"Paradise lost" is by the 17th century English poet John? A historical poetic poem by Milton. Milton selects a biblical story as the main part of the poem, and explains in Paradise lost the story of the human ancestors Adam and Eve who were tempted by the fallen angel Satan to betray God and were eventually expelled from the Garden of Eden. This paper expounds the fuzziness of Milton's Paradise lost by using the theory of Empson. In Empson's Seven forms of complex meaning, he divides fuzziness into seven types. The fuzziness produced in Paradise lost belongs to the sixth and seventh fuzziness defined by Empson: the image of God, the fuzziness produced by the image of Satan, belongs to the seventh fuzziness. Because two conflicting descriptions, defined by context, are applied to the shaping of one image at the same time; and the fuzziness of the blending of the Bible and Greek and Roman mythology belongs to the sixth kind of ambiguity. Because the fusion of two unrelated cultural systems is bound to form ambiguity. In this section, some of the text will be cited to analyze the fuzziness of the text. Besides analyzing the expression of fuzziness, the historical origin of its formation will also be analyzed in detail with the methodology of neo-historicism. Neo-historicists believe that literature has a political dimension and is the final product of power and subversive negotiation. After in-depth analysis, It can be concluded that the fuzziness in Paradise lost is the final product of the negotiation of power (represented by the political background and religion of Milton's time) and subversion (represented by Milton's own pursuit of freedom and religious interpretation). In addition, Milton's ideology, reflected by the fuzziness in Paradise lost, is summarized here. This paper refers to the "intertextuality" in New historicism in order to confirm the importance of Paradise lost in addition to the study of fuzziness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I561.072

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐貴霞;論彌爾頓的美德觀[J];四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

2 楊正潤;文學(xué)的“顛覆”和“抑制”——新歷史主義的文學(xué)功能論和意識形態(tài)論述評[J];外國文學(xué)評論;1994年03期

3 肖明翰;《失樂園》中的自由意志與人的墮落和再生[J];外國文學(xué)評論;1999年01期

4 張伯香,曹靜;《失樂園》中的基督教人文主義思想[J];外國文學(xué)研究;1999年01期

，

本文編號：2052847