本文選題：奈保爾　切入點(diǎn)：自我放逐　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：奈保爾（V. S. Naipaul），2001年諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)獲得者，，曾被《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》譽(yù)為“世界作家、語言大師、眼光獨(dú)到的小說奇才”。他在2001年及2004年分別出版了《半生》（Half a Life）和《魔種》（Magic Seeds）兩部作品，被認(rèn)為是其封筆之作，受到廣泛關(guān)注。這兩部作品以類似上下部的形式分別講述了主人公威利前半生與后半生如何在“自我放逐”過程中追尋自身身份，并最終認(rèn)清現(xiàn)實(shí)：理想主義并不存在，家難找、根難尋，身份對(duì)于他這種前殖民地人民來說是一個(gè)流動(dòng)性概念，他無法獲得單一身份。奈保爾用他的作品批判了前殖民地印度的偏狹、英國帝國主義國家的虛偽，同時(shí)也用他的作品體現(xiàn)了他這類人在確定自身身份時(shí)的迷茫與無奈。 論文核心內(nèi)容主要分為三個(gè)部分：第一章研究主人公威利第一次“自我放逐”：由印度至英國。在流亡的過程中，威利的身份第一次發(fā)生流變。種姓制度，作為印度社會(huì)中的痼疾，使威利自年幼起便對(duì)其民族文化產(chǎn)生負(fù)面情緒。父母跨種姓通婚給他帶來的恥辱使他深刻認(rèn)識(shí)到印度現(xiàn)存等級(jí)制度的愚昧與落后；童年家庭生活的不和諧使他開始向往書本中被美化的那種父母慈祥子女貼心的歐美家庭生活。因此，他排斥印度文化的一切，包括其精神及語言，試圖用英國文化武裝自己。本文認(rèn)為威利并沒有正確認(rèn)識(shí)其母國文化，通過“自我放逐”發(fā)生文化融合只會(huì)使其身份發(fā)生流變，但不會(huì)助其擺脫固有身份。第二章研究主人公威利兩次“自我放逐”：由英國至非洲復(fù)又輾轉(zhuǎn)德國柏林。這時(shí)，威利的身份再次發(fā)生流變。在試圖融入英國文化的過程中，威利遭受種族歧視，并感到與英國文化價(jià)值觀的格格不入，威利故而輾轉(zhuǎn)非洲，試圖回歸殖民地生活。在殖民者文化與殖民地文化沖突的非洲，已兼具兩重文化身份的威利錯(cuò)誤地將自己劃歸殖民者陣營，這使得他與當(dāng)?shù)胤纯怪趁裾邉?shì)力產(chǎn)生激烈沖突，最終不得不前往柏林。此時(shí)他選擇逃避現(xiàn)實(shí)，害怕再一次歷經(jīng)錯(cuò)誤的身份認(rèn)同。本文認(rèn)為威利心存遠(yuǎn)大理想，但缺乏實(shí)際行動(dòng)與抗?fàn)幱職猓诹魍鲞^程中無法認(rèn)清自身身份的流動(dòng)性。第三章研究主人公威利的“回歸”與最后一次“自我放逐”。前幾次“自我放逐”帶來的挫敗感使威利開始重新思考祖國印度的現(xiàn)狀及出路，決定以拯救者的身份回歸祖國，幫助祖國擺脫殖民者統(tǒng)治。但是激進(jìn)分子因?yàn)闉闈M足私欲組織的革命使他再一次陷入對(duì)自己半生輾轉(zhuǎn)旅程價(jià)值的思考。無奈之下，他通過“自我放逐”重回倫敦。這一次，他因?yàn)樾≌f創(chuàng)作被英國上流社會(huì)所追捧，但是這樣獲得的認(rèn)同感是虛幻的，他不會(huì)因此成為真正的英國人。本文認(rèn)為，在殖民與被殖民的世界中，威利一直抱有理想的世界觀，試圖確立單一身份是不切實(shí)際的。在與多種文化不斷沖突與融合的過程中，其身份一直在發(fā)生變化。 本論文的研究指出：后殖民狀態(tài)生存下的前殖民地人民想要通過“自我放逐”擺脫母國文化融入其他文化以確立全新身份。然而，他們并沒有認(rèn)識(shí)到由多種因素共同構(gòu)成的身份是不會(huì)因?yàn)槲幕h(huán)境的變化而被徹底擺脫。“自我放逐”只會(huì)使身份發(fā)生流變。本文的結(jié)論是，后殖民困境中，前殖民地人民最終獲得的將會(huì)是雜糅身份。
[Abstract]:Naipaul (V. S. Naipaul), who won the Nobel prize in 2001, was known as the "world's New York Times < > writer, master of language, vision novel wizards." he published respectively in 2001 and 2004 "life > (Half a Life) and < > (Magic Seeds) for the two works. Is the last novel, attracted widespread attention. These two works in a similar form of upper and lower respectively tells the story of the hero Wiley and the rest of life to pursue their own identity in the" self exile "in the process, and finally realize the reality: idealism does not exist in the home, to find the root, it is hard to find, for identity he is the former colonial people is a concept of liquidity, he can not get a single identity. Naipaul criticized the former colony of India provincial in his works, the British imperialist countries of hypocrisy, but also with his works reflects his kind in To determine the confusion and helplessness of your own identity.
The core content of the thesis is mainly divided into three parts: the first chapter of the protagonist Wiley first "self exile from India to England. Wiley in exile in the process, the identity of the first flow occurred. The caste system, as a chronic illness in India society, Wiley young has a negative emotion on the nation culture. Parents cross caste marriages brought him shame his profound understanding of the existing India hierarchy of ignorance and backwardness; childhood family disharmony that he began to yearn for a kind of books that beautify children were caring parents and family life in Europe and America. Therefore, all his rejection of the culture of India, including its spirit and try to use their own language, the British armed forces. The author thinks that Wiley is not a correct understanding of the native culture, through the" self exile "cultural integration will only make the identity change, but not Will help them get rid of the inherent identity. The second chapter studies the protagonist Wiley two "self exile from Britain to Africa and around Berlin in Germany. At this time, Wiley's identity again in an attempt to integrate with the culture changes. In the process, Wiley suffered from racial discrimination, and feel with the cultural value of Britain's view of the misfits, and Wiley after trying to return to Africa, colonial life. In colonial culture and colonial culture conflicts in Africa, has been with dual cultural identity of Wiley mistakenly classified themselves colonists camp, which he and the local rebel colonists forces confrontation, finally had to go to Berlin. At this time he chose to escape, fear again after false identity. The author thinks that Wiley have lofty ideals, but the lack of practical action and fighting courage, unable to recognize their own identity in exile in the process of flow The third chapter studies. The hero of Wiley's "return" and the last "self exile". Several times before the self exile of frustration that Wiley began to rethink the status quo and Countermeasures of the motherland India, decided to save the identity's return to the motherland, the motherland to help get rid of colonial rule. But because the militants to meet the revolution that he desires the organization once again into consideration removed the value of their life journey. In desperation, he goes back to londonthrough self exile. This time, because of his novels by the upper class society pursued, but obtained by this identity is unreal, he will not become a real British people. This paper argues that in the colonial and colonial world, Wiley has been idealistic view of the world, trying to establish a single identity is unrealistic. In a variety of cultural conflict and integration with the time In the course of the journey, its identity has been changing.
This paper points out: the former colonial people post colonial survival status under the "self exile" want to get rid of the parent culture into other cultures in order to establish a new identity. However, they did not realize that the common identity is constituted by a variety of factors will not change because of cultural environment and is completely out of "self exile". Will only make the identity change. The conclusion is that postcolonial dilemma, former colonial people will finally realize their hybrid identity.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I561.06

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 顧華;;文化流亡者的窘境——試析奈保爾的近期創(chuàng)作[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

2 蔣花;杜平;;“他者”和戲仿——對(duì)抗“文化殖民主義”的策略探討[J];當(dāng)代文壇;2007年05期

3 聶薇;;沿襲與超越——評(píng)奈保爾的小說《半生》[J];當(dāng)代外國文學(xué);2007年04期

4 潘敏芳;;顛覆·重構(gòu)——評(píng)奈保爾小說《半生》[J];淮北煤炭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

5 王莎烈;;空間批評(píng)解讀V.S.奈保爾的小說《魔種》[J];外國語文;2010年04期

6 潘敏芳;彭貴菊;;多元文化背景下解讀奈保爾的小說《半生》[J];世界文學(xué)評(píng)論;2011年01期

7 朱璞;;解讀奈保爾的封筆長(zhǎng)篇小說《魔種》[J];西昌學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

8 盛春來;徐建綱;;《魔種》中的烏托邦思想及其破滅[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年12期

本文編號(hào)：1625602