發(fā)布時間：2018-01-16 13:39

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：J.M庫切小說的《圣經(jīng)》原型研究　出處：《揚州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： J.M.庫切 圣經(jīng) 原型

【摘要】：J.M.庫切是南非歷史上第二位獲諾貝爾文學(xué)獎的作家,也是當(dāng)代南非最重要的作家之一。他的作品結(jié)構(gòu)精致、對話雋永、思辨深邃,兼具后殖民性與后現(xiàn)代性。他“沒有兩部作品采用了相同的創(chuàng)作手法”,但有一條明確的線索貫穿其中,那就是“他以眾多作品呈示了一個反復(fù)建構(gòu)的模式：盤旋下降的命運是其人物拯救靈魂的必要途徑。他的主人公在遭受打擊、沉淪落魄乃至被剝奪了外在尊嚴(yán)之后,總是能夠奇跡般地獲得重新站起來的力量�！北疚囊赃@句2003年的諾貝爾文學(xué)獎授獎辭為發(fā)散點,結(jié)合庫切的小說與《圣經(jīng)》文本,以弗萊的原型批評理論為依托,研究庫切小說中的《圣經(jīng)》原型,挖掘庫切小說與《圣經(jīng)》文本之間的聯(lián)系,探索其運用《圣經(jīng)》原型寫作的原因及意義所在。論文主體分為五個部分： 第一章：神話——原型批評。這一章對本文的理論依據(jù),即原型批評理論進(jìn)行界定。這一章主要分為兩個部分,第一部分對原型批評理論的兩個核心概念“神話”與“原型”進(jìn)行界定,第二部分以《批評的剖析》為基礎(chǔ)介紹弗萊的原型理論,并簡要說明原型理論與文學(xué)、《圣經(jīng)》的關(guān)系。 第二章：庫切小說中的《圣經(jīng)》人物原型。本章從替罪者的形象,受難者的形象,遷徙者的形象三個方面對庫切小說中的《圣經(jīng)》人物原型進(jìn)行分析,把這三個原型形象分別與庫切小說中的人物形象進(jìn)行對比,借此發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的聯(lián)系。 第三章：庫切小說中的《圣經(jīng)》結(jié)構(gòu)原型。本章分為三個部分,第一部分簡要介紹文學(xué)的“U形結(jié)構(gòu)”,第二部分從宏觀微觀兩個層面介紹《圣經(jīng)》中的“U形結(jié)構(gòu)”,第三部分以庫切的小說《恥》為藍(lán)本,以“樂園——犯罪——懲罰——懺悔——得救”為線索,分析庫切小說與《圣經(jīng)》相似的結(jié)構(gòu)。 第四章：庫切小說中《圣經(jīng)》原型的置換變形。本章以弗萊在《偉大的代碼：圣經(jīng)與文學(xué)》一書中提及的,認(rèn)為可以涵蓋整部《圣經(jīng)》的五個意象：樂園意象、牧放意象、農(nóng)業(yè)意象、城市意象以及人類生活相關(guān)意象為落腳點,分析庫切小說中對《圣經(jīng)》原型的置換變形,并歸納出這些被置換變形的原型都具有后殖民的特點。 第五章：庫切小說中《圣經(jīng)》原型存在的原因與意義。這一章主要分兩個部分,是論述庫切小說中《圣經(jīng)》原型存在的原因,一是論述庫切運用《圣經(jīng)》原型的意義。庫切小說運用《圣經(jīng)》原型,并對其進(jìn)行置換變形,是與他從小接觸的變質(zhì)的宗教環(huán)境,青年時代置身的文化環(huán)境,以及作為一名流散作家特殊的文化身邊不可分割的。這些現(xiàn)實原因影響了他今后的創(chuàng)作,使他在小說中試圖以猶太教彌賽亞救贖的邏輯來為西方現(xiàn)代人淺薄的道德感尋求出路,并塑造了一系列“南非神話”,在一定程度上消解了宗主國與殖民地國家的二元對立。 結(jié)語部分歸納了文章論述的主要內(nèi)容及其要點,總結(jié)了本文的核心論點：庫切對《圣經(jīng)》原型的運用及置換變形,不僅使其作品具備了宗教意蘊(yùn),達(dá)到了他的寫作意圖,也使《圣經(jīng)》原型與當(dāng)代語境融合,散發(fā)出時代的光輝。
[Abstract]:J.M. Coetzee is the history of South Africa second received the Nobel prize for literature, is one of the most important contemporary writers in South Africa. His works of exquisite structure, meaningful dialogue, deep thought, both post colonial and post modern. "He didn't have the two works by the creative method" the same, but there is a clear the thread running through, that is "to his numerous works presented a recurring pattern, the downward spiral of fate is necessary for the salvation of his characters. His hero in the hit, after the sinking and even deprived of external and dignity, always can miraculously get strength to stand" in this sentence. The speeches of the 2003 Nobel prize in literature for the divergence point, combining Coetzee's fiction and biblical texts, with Frye's archetypal theory based on the research in Coetzee's novels Bible original type, dig Between the Bible and dig in Coetzee's novel text links to explore the reasons and significance of using the < Bible > prototype writing. The paper is divided into five main parts:
The first chapter: myth archetype criticism. This chapter is the theoretical basis, namely the theory of archetypal criticism are defined. This chapter is divided into two parts, the first part defines two core concepts "to the theory of archetype criticism myth" and "prototype", analyzes the criticism of the second part to < > as the prototype of Frye's theory, and a brief description of the prototype theory and literature, the relationship between < Bible >.
The second chapter: the Biblical Archetypes in Coetzee's novels. This chapter for the crime of the image, the image of the victims, to analyze the Biblical Archetypes in Coetzee's novels from three aspects of migration image, the three archetypal images in Coetzee's novels respectively with the characters in contrast take this, find the connections.
The third chapter: the biblical prototype in Coetzee's novels. This chapter is divided into three parts, the first part briefly introduces the literature of the "U structure", the second part from the macro and micro two aspects of introduction of the Bible "U structure", the third part in Coetzee's novel "shame on" "paradise, criminal punishment confession salvation" as the clue, and analysis of Coetzee's novels in Bible similar structure.
The fourth chapter: the replacement of the Bible in his novel < > prototype deformation. In this chapter, Frye in < Great Code: the Bible and literature "mentioned in the book, that can cover five images of the whole Bible: Paradise: imagery, imagery, agricultural image, city image and human life related images as the result, analysis of replacement of Biblical prototype deformation in Coetzee's novels, and summed up these prototypes are replaced by post colonial characteristics.
The fifth chapter: the reason and significance of the Bible in his novel < > prototype. This chapter is divided into two parts, is the reason for the existence of the Bible prototype described in his novel < >, one is discussed using the Bible prototype Coetzee's significance. Using the Biblical archetype of Coetzee's novels, and carries on the displacement that is from contact with him of the deterioration of the religious environment, youth in the cultural environment, as well as a diasporic writer of special cultural side inseparable. These practical reasons affect his future creation, made in his novels to Jewish Messiah redemption logic to the modern western shallow the moral sense to seek a way out, and created a series of "South African Myth", to some extent two yuan between suzerain and colonial countries.
The conclusion part summarizes the main contents of the article and its main points, summed up the core argument of this paper: the use of Coetzee's biblical prototype and displacement and deformation, makes it not only works with religious implication, reached his intention of writing, the Biblical archetype and contemporary context fusion, emitting a glorious era.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I478.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 格萊勃斯泰因 ,裘小龍;關(guān)于神話原型批評的一篇導(dǎo)論[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?1989年02期

2 于鳳川;庫切:天生的諾貝爾桂冠作家[J];中外文化交流;2003年12期

3 張清江;;信仰的迷情與深情——從《約伯記》看義人受難中的上帝意圖[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 邵薇;新時期神話原型批評的本土化[D];西南師范大學(xué);2003年

2 張雪;弗萊的神話—原型批評理論[D];四川大學(xué);2004年

3 葉林峰;庫切小說人物的命運與救贖[D];天津師范大學(xué);2008年

4 顧新穎;論戴維·赫伯特·勞倫斯小說中的《圣經(jīng)》原型[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

5 張帆;庫切小說中的“受難者”形象[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

6 李榮芝;論庫切小說的藝術(shù)特色[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

7 高順潔;后殖民理論視角下的圣經(jīng)闡釋[D];河南大學(xué);2009年

8 梁萍;后殖民語境中庫切思想的雙重性[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年

9 萬沛;《荊棘鳥》與圣經(jīng)原型[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

10 宋張安;論黑人作家托妮·莫瑞森作品中的《圣經(jīng)》影響[D];鄭州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1433381