本文關(guān)鍵詞：奧德修斯的自我回歸之路　出處：《西南大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《奧德賽》 苦難 憤怒 機智 自我回歸

【摘要】：對《奧德賽》“漂泊”主題的研究,一直是荷馬研究的重點。而從哲學和政治學的角度研究《奧德賽》為重新認識《奧德賽》及其背后的時代背景、信仰關(guān)系提供了新的路徑。論文在古希臘哲學和政治學的框架下,嘗試性的探討奧德修斯回家過程中自我意識的不斷發(fā)展變化,從而對奧德修斯的回家之旅進行新視角下的研究。論文旨在闡明,《奧德賽》是“黑暗時代”的產(chǎn)物：由于長期的戰(zhàn)亂,導致人們信仰的缺失以及道德的喪失。奧德修斯的回家之旅不但是一般意義的回歸家園,它既是在于對道德重建和對信仰的重新認識,也是奧德修斯精神的自我回歸之旅。 論文的緒論部分將從兩個層次展開。第一個層次將闡述荷馬及其口頭敘事傳統(tǒng)并扼要的梳理前人對《奧德賽》的研究狀況。第二個層次展開論文的立論依據(jù)、批評范式以及創(chuàng)新價值。 論文的正文部分分為四個章節(jié)展開。第一章將梳理奧德修斯所經(jīng)受的三種苦難：特洛伊戰(zhàn)爭和回家之后的殺戮是戰(zhàn)爭的苦難,回家過程中經(jīng)歷的種種阻隔是生存的苦難,而長期的遠離家鄉(xiāng)靈魂無依的狀態(tài)是漂泊的苦難。通過對這三種苦難的解析,進一步探究苦難背后的深層意義,以及苦難對奧德修斯自我意識形成的影響。第二章將圍繞苦難帶給奧德修斯的后果——“憤怒”進行展開。具體由奧德修斯的節(jié)制和奧德修斯的憤怒兩個部分構(gòu)成。重點研究奧德修斯在面對強大的自然力和敵對的人勢力過于強大時奧德修斯所采取的審慎態(tài)度,然而這種審慎不是妥協(xié),而是其智慧的展現(xiàn),一旦有機會他就會展開進攻,甚至于“憤怒”。這種憤怒已不再是單純意義上的對求婚人爭奪自己王位的憤怒而是源于古希臘英雄對榮譽的一種追尋和對當時人們信仰缺失的”憤怒”。第三章對最能表現(xiàn)奧德修斯特點的智謀進行闡述。奧德修斯的回家之路中既是通過過人的才智克服種種苦難的過程,同時也是不斷地在苦難中尋求智慧的過程�？嚯y使奧德修斯擁有智慧,同時智慧又促使奧德修斯自我意識的形成。第四章是綜合考察奧德修斯自我意識的覺醒過程。重點研究奧德修斯自我意識何時開始形成和何時結(jié)束。奧德修斯的冥府之行對奧德修斯意義深遠,正是奧德修斯的冥府之行開啟了奧德修斯自我回歸的旅程的序幕。而奧德修斯回到故鄉(xiāng)伊塔卡也并不意味著奧德修斯自我意識的完成,只有奧德修斯和父親完全相認,并最終聽從神意的安排和求婚人的家屬達成諒解,才意味著奧德修斯自我意識的最終完成。從而得出奧德修斯自我意識的確立就是對道德重建和對信仰的重新認識。 結(jié)語部分對《奧德賽》的自我回歸之路略作評定,同時指出從哲學和古典政治學的視角為重新研究荷馬思想提供了一個新的視角。
[Abstract]:The study of the theme of "wandering" in Odyssey has always been the focus of Homer's study, and the study of "Odyssey" from the perspective of philosophy and political science is to re-understand Odyssey and the background of the times behind it. Faith relationship provides a new way. Under the framework of ancient Greek philosophy and politics, this paper tries to explore the continuous development and change of Odysseus' self-consciousness in the process of returning home. The purpose of this study is to clarify that Odysseus is the product of the Dark Ages: because of the long war. Odysseus' journey home is not only a return home in the general sense, but also a new understanding of moral reconstruction and belief. It is also the journey of Odysseus' spiritual self-return. The introduction part of the thesis will be carried out from two levels. The first level will elaborate Homer and his oral narrative tradition and briefly comb the previous research on Odyssey. The second level will develop the theoretical basis of the thesis. Critical paradigm and innovative value. The text of the thesis is divided into four chapters. The first chapter will sort out the three kinds of suffering Odysseus experienced: the Trojan War and the killing after returning home are the suffering of war. Through the analysis of these three kinds of tribulations, we can further explore the deep meaning behind the suffering. And the impact of suffering on the formation of Odysseus' self-consciousness. Chapter two will focus on the consequences of suffering for Odysseus-"anger" It is made up of two parts: the temperance of Odysseus and the anger of Odysseus. The study focuses on Odysseus' prudent behavior in the face of great natural force and the excessive power of adversaries. Degree. This prudence, however, is not a compromise, but a display of wisdom, and he will attack whenever he has the opportunity. Even "anger." this anger is no longer simply anger at the suitor for his throne, but from an ancient Greek hero's quest for honor and anger at the lack of faith at the time. The third chapter elaborates on the ingenuity that best characterizes Odysseus. Odysseus's journey home is a process of overcoming all sorts of suffering through extraordinary intelligence. At the same time, it is the process of constantly seeking wisdom in suffering. Suffering gives Odysseus wisdom. At the same time, wisdom promotes the formation of Odysseus' self consciousness. Chapter 4th is a comprehensive study of the awakening process of Odysseus' self consciousness. The focus is on when Odysseus' self consciousness began to form and when it ended. The trip to Hades meant a lot to Odysseus. It was Odysseus' trip to the underworld that began the journey of Odysseus' self-return, and Odysseus' return to his hometown of Itarka did not mean the completion of Odysseus' self-consciousness. Only Odysseus fully recognized his father and eventually obeyed divine arrangements and reached an understanding with the family of the suitor. It is concluded that the establishment of Odysseus' self-consciousness is the reconstruction of morality and the reunderstanding of faith. In the conclusion part, the author makes a brief evaluation of Odyssey's way of self-regression, and points out that the philosophical and classical political perspectives provide a new perspective for the re-study of Homer's thought.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I545.072

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 薛敬梅;;漂泊、鄉(xiāng)愁與家園——《奧德賽》和《埃涅阿斯紀》的生態(tài)反思[J];湖北民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年04期

2 李春霞;楊玉萍;;《奧德賽》的漂泊母題[J];河西學院學報;2006年04期

3 潘桂仙;論古希臘文化的人本主義[J];柳州師專學報;2002年02期

4 呂超;;荷馬傳說與口述時代[J];世界文化;2006年05期

5 許德華;魏麗英;;淺析《荷馬史詩》中樸素的人本主義思想傾向[J];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)科技學院學報;2007年01期

6 陳戎女;;佩涅洛佩的紡織和夢——論《奧德賽》的女性主義[J];外國文學評論;2008年02期

7 劉小楓;;奧德修斯的名相[J];中國圖書評論;2007年09期

8 劉小楓;;詩人的“權(quán)杖”[J];中國圖書評論;2007年10期

9 毛竹生;;論荷馬史詩中的榮譽觀念[J];中文自學指導;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1418760