本文選題：定武本　切入點：啟功先生　出處：《中國書法》2012年07期

【摘要】：正我們從啟功先生題拙寫《蘭亭》的《南鄉(xiāng)子》中開頭"楔帖入昭陵,定武歐臨隔壁聽"兩句說起,這就是說啟先生不相信歷來認為"定武蘭亭"是歐公臨摹的那種說法。啟先生的眼力是令人佩服的,但這種反傳統(tǒng)之說畢竟還沒有具體的學(xué)術(shù)論證,而我們?nèi)缃褚讶贿\用了三宗"法寶"確切證明了"定武蘭亭"與歐公毫無關(guān)系,這個歷代崇拜"定武"的基本論據(jù)已然歸于破滅。那么,我們是否就因此而有意對于"定武本"特加譏嘲貶抑呢?若作此想那就大失我們的本意了。正相反,我們是在這種新的
[Abstract]:Just as we begin with Mr. Qi Gong's "Nanxiang Zi" in the title "Lanting", "wedges into Zhaoling, Dingwu is next door to listen" two sentences say, That is to say, Mr. Qi does not believe that "Ding Wulanting" has always been regarded as a copy of ou Gong. Mr. Qi's eye is admirable, but after all, there is no concrete academic argument for this kind of anti-tradition theory. And we have now used three "magic weapons" to prove that "Dingvuanting" has nothing to do with ou Gong, and that this basic argument for worshipping "Dingwu" has been shattered. Do we therefore intend to ridicule the "Dingwu Ben" vodka? To think so would be a great loss of our intention. On the contrary, we are in this new
【分類號】：J292.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 邢文;;《蘭亭》再辨:晉人隸書筆意的再認識[J];民族藝術(shù);2012年04期

2 ;2004春拍預(yù)覽[J];收藏家;2004年04期

3 馮亦吾;;書法名著選講(連載之六)[J];書法之友;1994年02期

4 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1657681