【摘要】：城市和鄉(xiāng)村作為人類聚居和生活的兩類場所,同屬于人類居住環(huán)境。它們各自有各自的優(yōu)勢和不足:鄉(xiāng)村以從事農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)為主,有特定的自然景觀、豐富的自然資源和勞動力資源,同時存在先進技術(shù)缺乏、生產(chǎn)力不發(fā)達,經(jīng)濟落后等發(fā)展障礙;城市以工業(yè)、商業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)為主,有先進的科學(xué)技術(shù),是人才和資本的聚集地,但存在環(huán)境污染、人口壓力和交通擁堵等問題。伴隨著城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)的進程,鄉(xiāng)村出現(xiàn)文化缺失、生態(tài)環(huán)境惡化、千村一面等弊端,出現(xiàn)這些現(xiàn)象的主要原因是對城市與鄉(xiāng)村關(guān)系的片面理解,鄉(xiāng)村在以農(nóng)業(yè)資源支持城市的同時,城市也在以不同的方式促成鄉(xiāng)村發(fā)展,鄉(xiāng)村問題的解決不能脫離城鄉(xiāng)互動關(guān)系,因此,文章以城鄉(xiāng)互動關(guān)系為切入點探討鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)問題。本文首先通過對國內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系相關(guān)理論的梳理,總結(jié)出城市和鄉(xiāng)村是人們不同生活方式的平等選項,二者之間是相互聯(lián)系、相互依存、相互作用的互動關(guān)系。其次在對鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)相關(guān)理論和實踐分析的基礎(chǔ)上,指出城鄉(xiāng)互動作用下鄉(xiāng)村的多元價值被重新認識、傳統(tǒng)民俗文化開始復(fù)興、國家資金和政策對鄉(xiāng)村的支持以及基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的逐漸完善,鄉(xiāng)村將迎來發(fā)展契機,并歸納出鄉(xiāng)村營建的策略和方法:產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展要挖掘鄉(xiāng)土文化,升級鄉(xiāng)村旅游,因地制宜引入農(nóng)家樂、民宿等第三產(chǎn)業(yè),促進產(chǎn)業(yè)融合,發(fā)展互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+農(nóng)業(yè);生活空間要實現(xiàn)城鄉(xiāng)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施均等化,延伸建筑空間功能;生態(tài)環(huán)境上要保護鄉(xiāng)村肌理,發(fā)掘潛在鄉(xiāng)村景觀,創(chuàng)造景觀價值。然后,用這種思維對照參與的界埡鄉(xiāng)村改造項目進行印證,在產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展上打造有機茶葉品牌,開展公司+鄉(xiāng)村旅游+合作社模式產(chǎn)業(yè);在生活空間上,進行夯土建筑改造,賦予建筑新功能,與生活方式相協(xié)調(diào);在生態(tài)環(huán)境上營造綠地景觀,保護鄉(xiāng)村肌理,修建景觀茶室,創(chuàng)造景觀價值;完善基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和綠化配置,公共服務(wù)設(shè)施與市場相結(jié)合。最后希望通過本文研究能為我國鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)實踐提供一種雙向關(guān)系思考下的發(fā)展路徑,或許未來在城市和鄉(xiāng)村里面居住的人,并非所謂的城里人和農(nóng)村人,而是愿意住城里的人和愿意住在農(nóng)村人。城市和鄉(xiāng)村兩種生活都值得被尊重,二者應(yīng)該互為補全實現(xiàn)共同發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:City and country, as two kinds of places of human settlement and living, belong to human living environment. Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages: the rural areas are mainly engaged in agricultural production, have special natural landscape, abundant natural resources and labor resources, at the same time, there are some obstacles to development, such as lack of advanced technology, underdeveloped productive forces, backward economy, etc. Cities are dominated by industry, commerce and service, with advanced science and technology. They are the gathering places of talents and capital, but there are some problems such as environmental pollution, population pressure and traffic congestion. Along with the process of urbanization construction, there are some disadvantages in rural areas, such as cultural deficiency, deterioration of ecological environment, one side of thousands of villages, and so on. The main reason for these phenomena is the one-sided understanding of the relationship between cities and villages. While the countryside supports the city with agricultural resources, the city also promotes the rural development in different ways, the solution of the rural problem can not be separated from the interaction between the urban and rural areas. Therefore, the article discusses the rural construction problem from the point of view of the urban-rural interaction. Firstly, this paper summarizes that urban and rural areas are equal options for different ways of life by combing the theories of scholars at home and abroad on the relationship between urban and rural areas, and that the two are interrelated, interdependent and interactive. Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of the theory and practice of rural construction, it is pointed out that under the interaction of urban and rural areas, the pluralistic values of rural areas have been re-recognized, and the traditional folk culture has begun to revive. With the support of national funds and policies for rural areas and the gradual improvement of infrastructure, the rural areas will welcome the opportunity of development, and conclude the strategies and methods of rural construction: the industrial development should excavate the local culture, upgrade the rural tourism, According to the local conditions, we should introduce the tertiary industries such as farming, housing and so on, promote the integration of industries, and develop Internet agriculture; The living space should realize the equalization of urban and rural infrastructure, extend the function of building space, protect the rural texture in the ecological environment, excavate the potential rural landscape, and create the landscape value. Then, this thinking is used to verify the Jieya rural transformation project, to build organic tea brand in the industrial development, and to develop the rural tourism cooperative mode industry of the company. In the living space, it is necessary to reform the rammed earth architecture, endow the building with new functions, coordinate with the way of life, create the green landscape in the ecological environment, protect the rural texture, build the landscape teahouse, and create the landscape value. Improve infrastructure and green allocation, public service facilities and the market combined. Finally, it is hoped that the research in this paper can provide a way of development under the consideration of two-way relations in the practice of rural construction in our country. Perhaps the people living in cities and villages in the future are not the so-called urbanites and rural people. They are the people who want to live in the city and the people who want to live in the countryside. Both urban and rural life are worthy of respect, and they should complement each other to achieve common development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323;TU982.29

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐振雄;;鄉(xiāng)村景觀營造中的景觀信息模型(LIM)構(gòu)建初探——以“無止橋”鄉(xiāng)村公益實踐為例[J];包裝世界;2016年02期

2 尚瑩瑩;;從“碧山計劃”窺探我國藝術(shù)介入鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀[J];美與時代(城市版);2015年08期

3 謝凱;李鴻瑞;;關(guān)于郝堂村鄉(xiāng)村建造的觀察筆記[J];建筑技藝;2015年08期

4 鄒怡情;;“文化+藝術(shù)+技藝”鄉(xiāng)建 碧山計劃對鄉(xiāng)土遺產(chǎn)保護的啟示[J];世界遺產(chǎn);2015年08期

5 賀勇;;鄉(xiāng)村建造,作為一種觀照[J];西部人居環(huán)境學(xué)刊;2015年03期

6 樊新生;李小建;高更和;羅慶;;農(nóng)戶活動空間選擇的影響因素及其收入效應(yīng)——河南省農(nóng)戶調(diào)查與實證[J];地理科學(xué);2014年08期

7 何慧麗;程曉蕊;宗世法;;當(dāng)代新鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)運動的實踐總結(jié)及反思——以開封10年經(jīng)驗為例[J];開放時代;2014年04期

8 王磊;孫君;李昌平;;逆城市化背景下的系統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)建——河南信陽郝堂村建設(shè)實踐[J];建筑學(xué)報;2013年12期

9 顏毓?jié)?任學(xué)文;;日本造村運動對我國新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的啟示[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè);2013年06期

10 戴帥;陸化普;程穎;;上下結(jié)合的鄉(xiāng)村規(guī)劃模式研究[J];規(guī)劃師;2010年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曹田;“城鄉(xiāng)互構(gòu)”關(guān)系中的設(shè)計價值選擇與中國鄉(xiāng)村實踐[D];中央美術(shù)學(xué)院;2016年

2 黃麗坤;基于文化人類學(xué)視角的鄉(xiāng)村營建策略與方法研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

3 王新越;我國旅游化與城鎮(zhèn)化互動協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王鏡均;基于新型城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系的蘇南鄉(xiāng)村空間轉(zhuǎn)型與規(guī)劃對策研究[D];蘇州科技學(xué)院;2015年

2 張智強;“社區(qū)營造”模式下的農(nóng)村社區(qū)更新研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2013年

3 莊光勝;地方自治背景下的鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)運動[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2318309