發(fā)布時間：2018-08-28 07:33

【摘要】：歸因于科技的興起到普遍化,人們對宗教信仰的質(zhì)疑越來越多,尤其是少數(shù)民族宗教信仰。它是不是真的落后?它與現(xiàn)代化理性之間是否相悖?等等困惑也一直占據(jù)人們的思維。作為對這一類問題的回應,本文以社會學的理性選擇理論為視角,對以大理地區(qū)為典型的白族本主信仰進行了研究。本研究將本主崇拜中的“理性選擇”這一核心概念操作化為四個維度和其他具體指標,即(1)經(jīng)濟理性(本主信仰的利弊權(quán)衡、投入與產(chǎn)出、“精神經(jīng)濟”、旅游效益),(2)政治理性(政治意識、政治魅力、社會穩(wěn)定),(3)文化理性(象征體系、文化哲思、文化傳承),(4)生態(tài)理性(神話傳說、禁忌等信仰精神體和廟宇、碑刻、文學作品等信仰實體中的生態(tài)選擇)。在此基礎上,對每一種理性進行了反思,描述和探討了本主崇拜在各個維度及其指標上的理性選擇狀況與程度;同時,對每種理性繼續(xù)維持的現(xiàn)實基礎(價值)與四大理性之間是否存在何種聯(lián)系、何種互動機制進行了一定的分析探討。本研究的基本結(jié)論是:本主信仰是白族綜合經(jīng)濟、政治、文化、生態(tài)各方面因素而自由理性選擇的結(jié)果,是在白族社會中適者生存的產(chǎn)物。同時,這四種具體理性并非孤立割據(jù)的存在,而是相互牽制、共存統(tǒng)一于社會共同體之中,并將長期繼續(xù)存在于白族本主信仰社會中。
[Abstract]:Due to the popularity of science and technology, people are questioning more and more religious beliefs, especially the religious beliefs of ethnic minorities. Is it really backward? Is it contrary to modern rationality? And so on confusion has always occupied people's minds. In response to this kind of problem, this paper studies the Bai people's main beliefs in Dali region from the perspective of the theory of rational choice in sociology. In this study, the core concept of "rational choice" in the worship of the owner is operated into four dimensions and other specific indicators, namely (1) economic rationality (trade-off between the advantages and disadvantages of the principal belief, input and output, and "spiritual economy"). Tourism benefits), (2) political rationality (political consciousness, political charm, social stability), (3) cultural rationality (symbolic system, cultural philosophy, cultural heritage), (4) ecological rationality (myth, legend, taboo and other beliefs of spiritual bodies and temples, inscriptions, etc. The ecological choice of religious entities, such as literary works On the basis of this, the author reflects on each reason, describes and discusses the rational choice condition and degree of native worship in each dimension and its index, at the same time, This paper analyzes the relationship between the realistic basis (value) of each kind of rationality and the four rationales, and discusses the interaction mechanism of each kind of rationality. The basic conclusion of this study is that the main belief is the result of free and rational choice of the Bai nationality's comprehensive economic, political, cultural and ecological factors, and is the product of the survival of the fittest in the Bai society. At the same time, these four kinds of concrete rationality are not the isolated existence, but the mutual restraint, the coexistence and unification in the social community, and will continue to exist in the Bai nationality main belief society for a long time.
【學位授予單位】：云南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：B933

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張慧平;馬超德;鄭小賢;;淺談少數(shù)民族生態(tài)文化與森林資源管理[J];北京林業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

2 何永福,舒家驊;白族本主的形成及其流變[J];大理師專學報(社會科學版);1996年04期

3 李戎戎;張錫祿;;白族傳統(tǒng)社會和諧思想及其現(xiàn)代價值[J];大理學院學報;2007年03期

4 王銀春;;白族傳統(tǒng)慈善倫理及其當代價值[J];湖北民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年04期

5 李駿;從理性選擇到社會選擇[J];社會;2004年06期

6 張本俊;于鵬;王東;;角色神圣到世俗異化:體育明星崇拜變遷的動因與理性審視[J];體育與科學;2013年03期

7 阮榮平;鄭風田;劉力;;宗教信仰選擇 一個西方宗教經(jīng)濟學的文獻梳理[J];社會;2013年04期

8 段壽桃;白族本主文化[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1995年02期

9 呂耀懷;經(jīng)濟理性與道德理性[J];學術(shù)論壇;1999年03期

10 沈義淑;;淺析大理白族本主信仰的文化意蘊[J];赤峰學院學報(漢文哲學社會科學版);2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 �？∶�;理性選擇理論視角下的農(nóng)民工定居行動研究[D];中南大學;2007年

，

本文編號：2208719