本文選題：草地早熟禾 + 生理有效水閾值�。� 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年,水資源的匱乏成為了當(dāng)前乃至將來普遍性存在的問題,并且在很多城市,草坪的灌溉沒有規(guī)劃,管理也相對粗放,造成大量水資源浪費(fèi)。因此,了解草坪的需水量和需水規(guī)律及其他的節(jié)水方法顯得十分重要。本文通過摸清草地早熟禾草坪草生理需水閾值,以期揭示草地早熟禾草坪合理需水機(jī)理,同時(shí)找出較為耐旱品種,為半干旱地區(qū)城市草坪制定高效合理的精準(zhǔn)節(jié)水灌溉制度提供可靠的理論依據(jù)。本文研究了草地早熟禾(Poa pratensis L.)4個(gè)品種(凱蒂、凱蘭德、愛娃和優(yōu)異)萎蔫后分4個(gè)梯度(分別為田間持水量的100%、80%、60%和40%)復(fù)水的過程,從2014年4月開始測定和觀察了田間持水量、土壤絕干含水量、地上生物量、地下生物量、萎蔫系數(shù)以及草坪草恢復(fù)景觀和維持景觀的時(shí)間,比較地上生物量、地下生物量等指標(biāo)在100%的灌溉梯度下與其他條件下的區(qū)別,找到草地早熟禾草坪草生理需水閩值；并利用綜合評價(jià)方法對控水之后的各指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析,以期找到較為抗旱的品種,研究結(jié)果表明：(1)草地早熟禾有效生理水的上限為田間持水量的80%,各品種之間無明顯不同。(2)草地早熟禾品種凱蒂、凱蘭德、愛娃和優(yōu)異的生理有效水的下限分別為54.84 g/kg、54.24 g/kg、54.2 g/kg.67.54 g/kg,介于田間持水量的16.5%和20.6%之間。(3)4個(gè)品種抗旱性由強(qiáng)到弱排序?yàn)閯P蘭德優(yōu)異愛娃凱蒂,其中最抗旱的品種是凱蘭德。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the scarcity of water resources has become a common problem at present and even in the future, and in many cities, irrigation of lawn is not planned, management is relatively extensive, resulting in a large number of waste of water resources. Therefore, it is very important to understand the water demand and law of lawn and other water saving methods. In this paper, the physiological threshold of water demand of Kentucky bluegrass was investigated in order to reveal the reasonable mechanism of water demand and to find out the drought-tolerant varieties. It provides a reliable theoretical basis for the establishment of efficient and reasonable precision water-saving irrigation system for urban lawn in semi-arid area. In this paper, the process of rehydration of four varieties of POA pratensis L. (Cathy, Kelland, Eva and excellent) was studied, which was divided into four gradients (100% and 40% of field water holding capacity, respectively) after wilting. The field water capacity was measured and observed from April 2014. Soil dry water content, aboveground biomass, underground biomass, wilting coefficient and the time of landscape restoration and maintenance of turf grass were compared between the above ground biomass and underground biomass under 100% irrigation gradient compared with other conditions. The physiological water threshold of Kentucky bluegrass was found and the indexes after water control were analyzed by comprehensive evaluation method in order to find the drought-resistant varieties. The results showed that the upper limit of available physiological water of POA pratensis was 80% of field water holding capacity, and there was no obvious difference among varieties. The lower limits of Ava and excellent physiological available water were 54.84 g / kg / kg and 54.24 g / kg 路kg ~ (2) g/kg.67.54 / kg, respectively. The drought resistance of the four varieties ranged from strong to weak to Kelander's. The most drought-resistant variety was Kelland, which was between 16.5% and 20.6% of the field water holding capacity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：S688.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓烈保,鮑維寶,陳學(xué)平;草地早熟禾在北京引種適應(yīng)性研究[J];北京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

2 趙炳祥,胡林,陳佐忠,張福鎖,張新民;常用六種草坪草蒸散量及作物系數(shù)的研究[J];北京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

3 潘全山,韓建國,王培;五個(gè)草地早熟禾品種蒸散量及節(jié)水性[J];草地學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

4 郭振飛,盧少云;基因工程在草坪草育種上的應(yīng)用[J];草地學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

5 潘全山,韓建國,王培;播量及修剪留茬高度對草地早熟禾草坪蒸散量的影響[J];草原與草坪;2000年04期

6 胡桂馨,王代軍,劉榮堂;干旱脅迫下內(nèi)生真菌對高羊茅保護(hù)酶活性的影響[J];草原與草坪;2001年01期

7 徐敏云,劉自學(xué),胡自治;灌溉對三種冷季型草坪草蒸散耗水的影響[J];草原與草坪;2004年01期

8 高凱,劉自學(xué),胡自治,朱鐵霞;不同草種單播草坪蒸散量的研究[J];草原與草坪;2004年02期

9 王在升;黃頂;嚴(yán)學(xué)兵;王X;;現(xiàn)代城市草坪節(jié)水技術(shù)初探[J];草原與草坪;2005年06期

10 王齊;孫吉雄;王有國;師春娟;;草坪施用土壤改良劑對干旱脅迫的緩解效應(yīng)[J];草原與草坪;2008年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董麗華;草地早熟禾不同品種抗旱性研究[D];寧夏大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1879934