【摘要】：莊學(xué)在明代前期幾近荒涼,中后期開(kāi)始逐漸繁榮,直至明朝滅亡后,莊學(xué)仍是熱度未退�？梢哉f(shuō),明代莊學(xué)實(shí)為北宋莊學(xué)高峰遠(yuǎn)離后所出現(xiàn)的又一個(gè)高峰,也為清代莊學(xué)的發(fā)展開(kāi)了一個(gè)好頭。明代莊學(xué)著作頗豐,流傳下來(lái)且有學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值的不少,但學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)明代莊學(xué)卻遠(yuǎn)不及對(duì)清代莊學(xué)的研究。直至今日,明代莊學(xué)的許多著作仍被忽視,未被治莊者所利用。李贄的《莊子解》就是這樣一部被忽略了的莊學(xué)著作。全文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,共分為三章。第一章對(duì)李贄生平和明代莊學(xué)發(fā)展脈絡(luò)進(jìn)行述要,并將李贄《莊子解》一書(shū)放入整個(gè)明代莊學(xué)研究的大背景下分析其地位和獨(dú)特性。第二章梳理了李贄《莊子解》的著述特點(diǎn),如其為何只解《莊子》內(nèi)七篇、解莊時(shí)清晰的層次概念和多樣的評(píng)解形式等。第三章探討了《莊子解》對(duì)《莊子》思想的繼承與發(fā)展,從“道”論、人生觀、認(rèn)識(shí)論三方面進(jìn)行了闡述。李贄是晚明一位重要的思想家,思想不流于俗,頗有自己的見(jiàn)解。這樣一位學(xué)者在注解《莊子》時(shí)一定不會(huì)完全因循前說(shuō),而是會(huì)有自己獨(dú)特的觀點(diǎn)。這些獨(dú)特不止是李贄《莊子解》的價(jià)值所在,也是本章分析的一個(gè)關(guān)注點(diǎn)。本文在寫(xiě)作前對(duì)《莊子解》文本進(jìn)行了細(xì)讀與分析,寫(xiě)作時(shí)結(jié)合其他文獻(xiàn)和相關(guān)著作對(duì)《莊子解》進(jìn)行了較為全面的探究,以期對(duì)《莊子解》有更為系統(tǒng)的認(rèn)知,從而使《莊子解》一書(shū)的價(jià)值得到應(yīng)有的重視。
[Abstract]:Zhuangxue was almost desolate in the early Ming Dynasty, and began to flourish gradually in the middle and later period, until the end of the Ming Dynasty. It can be said that the study of Zhuang in the Ming Dynasty was another peak after the peak of the study of Zhuang in the Northern Song Dynasty, and it also opened a good beginning for the development of the study of Zhuang in the Qing Dynasty. There are a lot of books on Zhuang study in Ming Dynasty, and many of them are of academic value, but the study of Zhuang study in Ming Dynasty is far less than the study on Zhuang study in Qing Dynasty. To this day, many of the works of Zhuang School in the Ming Dynasty are still neglected and not used by those who govern them. Zhuangzi's interpretation by Li Zhi is such a neglected book. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter gives a brief account of Li Zhi's life and the development of Zhuang study in Ming Dynasty, and puts Li Zhi's book Zhuangzi's solution into the background of the study of Zhuang in the whole Ming Dynasty to analyze its status and uniqueness. The second chapter combs Li Zhi's "Zhuangzi solution" writing characteristics, such as why it only solve "Zhuangzi" seven articles, the clear concept of hierarchy and various forms of commentary. The third chapter discusses the inheritance and development of Zhuangzi's thought from three aspects: "Tao", "outlook on life" and "epistemology". Li Zhi is an important thinker in the late Ming Dynasty. Such a scholar in the annotations Zhuangzi will not completely follow the former, but will have their own unique point of view. These characteristics are not only the value of Li Zhi's Zhuangzi solution, but also the focus of this chapter. Before writing, this paper makes a detailed reading and analysis of the text of Zhuangzi's interpretation, and makes a more comprehensive inquiry into Zhuangzi's interpretation in combination with other literature and related works, in order to have a more systematic understanding of Zhuangzi's interpretation. Therefore, the value of the book Zhuangzi's solution should be paid more attention to.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 邢猛;;李贄《莊子解》的解莊特點(diǎn)[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年07期

2 陳水德;;論李贄思想的道家內(nèi)藏[J];黎明職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

3 李超;;“2012年李贄國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”學(xué)術(shù)綜述[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

4 劉海濤;謝謙;;明代《莊子》接受論[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2009年11期

5 許建平;李贄思想演變中的兩個(gè)問(wèn)題考辨[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年08期

6 余愛(ài)華;《焚書(shū)》中與李贄交游的麻城人物初探[J];黃岡師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

7 白秀芳;近百年李贄研究綜述[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 周雅杰;王夫之《莊子解》研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2014年

2 諶雨;李贄文學(xué)思想研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

3 王倩倩;林希逸《莊子，

本文編號(hào)：2189333