名豈文章著:論杜甫生前詩名為賦名所掩
[Abstract]:At present, there are great differences and controversies in academic circles about the size of du Fu's literary names. However, these debates often confuse du Fu's poetic names with those of Fu's poems, thus neglecting a basic fact. That is, du Fu's poetic title and Fu's name were not in accord with each other. Du Fu was given the title of Fu because he presented the three gifts in nine years of Tianbao, and since then the title of his poem has been masked by the name of Fu. This is the fundamental reason why du poem was not selected in Tang poetry, and the main reason for the difference between the titles of Li du and his former works. Among du Fu's friends, few of them called his poetic talent, but much praised his Fu talent. Du Fu often called himself Yang Xiong, an Fu writer in the Han Dynasty, and Sima Xiangru called himself. Du's poems, such as "whether there are articles in shock", "my fame is because the article is famous", "a hundred years of songs from suffering, not see a confidant," and so on, all reveal du Fu's helplessness and sighing about this kind of cognitive dislocation at that time.
【作者單位】: 山東大學儒學高等研究院;
【基金】:山東大學基本科研業(yè)務費專項資金資助項目“杜詩學文獻整理與研究”的階段性成果
【分類號】:I207.22
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 吳光興;;論唐人“文章即詩歌”的文學觀念[J];文學評論;2014年06期
2 王新芳;孫微;;論晚唐五代筆記小說對杜甫生平事跡的杜撰[J];中國典籍與文化;2014年01期
3 吳光興;;李杜詩風與唐詩疆域“三國”說[J];文學遺產;2011年05期
4 張起;;牛溲馬ma皆有意 不許后生漫涂鴉——唐人選本不選杜詩不能證明杜甫是二流詩人[J];杜甫研究學刊;2009年03期
5 張浩遜;;生前文章驚海內 身后垂名動萬年——論唐人對杜詩的接受[J];常熟理工學院學報;2008年03期
6 邱睿;;唐人選唐詩無杜詩現象補說[J];文史雜志;2007年02期
7 張忠綱;;杜甫獻《三大禮賦》時間考辨[J];文史哲;2006年01期
8 胡可先,童曉剛;《本事詩》新考[J];中國典籍與文化;2004年01期
9 胡明;關于唐詩──兼談近百年來的唐詩研究[J];文學評論;1999年02期
10 楊勝寬;從《河岳英靈集》不選杜詩說到殷t牭難∈曜糩J];杜甫研究學刊;1994年01期
【共引文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 潘吉英;;聞一多與馬修·阿諾德——論聞一多“生活史”治學方法的主要淵源[J];棗莊學院學報;2017年04期
2 蘆笛;;唐《本事詩》考補四則[J];華夏文化論壇;2017年01期
3 孫微;;名豈文章著:論杜甫生前詩名為賦名所掩[J];文史哲;2017年02期
4 曾祥波;;現存五種宋人“杜甫年譜”平議——以魯,
本文編號:2132335
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2132335.html