發(fā)布時間：2018-06-16 19:59

  本文選題：柳宗元 + 蘇軾��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：新世紀(jì)以來,在古代文學(xué)領(lǐng)域,文學(xué)接受史的研究已經(jīng)成為熱門話題,對經(jīng)典作家的研究更是重中之重。柳宗元與陶淵明作為詩歌領(lǐng)域的經(jīng)典作家,對他們的文學(xué)接受研究目前蔚為大觀。蘇軾作為二人共同的第一讀者,更是引人注目。目前學(xué)界對蘇軾的陶柳詩接受研究雖多,但仍存在不夠細(xì)致之處。本文的目的,就是在細(xì)節(jié)上描繪出蘇軾在細(xì)節(jié)上接受柳詩的變化過程,以及由此產(chǎn)生的蘇軾“棄柳歸陶”的轉(zhuǎn)變。本文共三章,第一章主要分析了蘇軾的柳宗元接受的總體情況:他對柳宗元有兩種涇渭分明的評價:一種是肯定性評價,大力贊美柳詩;一種是否定性評價,對柳宗元的政治生涯、哲學(xué)思想及個人品德予以批判。表面上看來,蘇軾做出上述評價的原因,一方面是因為柳宗元參加的永貞革新本就沒有堅實的政治基礎(chǔ),柳宗元又在失敗后被定義為叛黨,兼之宋人正統(tǒng)觀極其強烈,但另一方面柳宗元的文學(xué)成就確實高,如此一來,自然會有復(fù)雜的評價。但是蘇軾能在歷史上首次發(fā)現(xiàn)柳詩的價值,是因為宋代詩學(xué)以平淡美為終極審美典范,而這一典范直到蘇軾才真正確立。本文第二章以時間為線索,對蘇軾接受柳詩的具體過程與細(xì)節(jié)做了細(xì)致的梳理,分析了柳詩對蘇軾的作用。蘇軾對柳詩的接受大體分為四個時期:神宗元豐二年之前;元豐二年至哲宗元yP二年;哲宗元yP三年至元yP八年;哲宗紹圣元年至蘇軾去世。其中第二個、第四個時期是蘇軾柳詩接受的高潮期,第一個、第三個時期是低潮期。同時,第二個、第四個時期是蘇軾仕途生涯的低潮期,第一個、第三個時期是高潮期。這種反差,體現(xiàn)出的是柳詩對飽經(jīng)挫折的蘇軾的重要作用。柳宗元支持變法的立場使得飽受新黨迫害的蘇軾對他有敵意,而且不能理解柳宗元。但是被貶后,蘇軾能夠?qū)α谠в小袄斫獾耐椤?柳詩的抗?fàn)幰庾R成為他的精神支柱之一,柳詩中的平淡也能撫慰蘇軾的心靈。本文第三章主要分析蘇軾“棄柳歸陶”的原因。棄柳歸陶是指蘇軾對陶柳詩的接受大體是同時進(jìn)行的,但是以“和陶詩”為標(biāo)志,蘇軾最終選擇了陶詩作為詩歌典范,選擇了淵明為人生楷模,而非柳宗元。首先,這是因為蘇軾的入世之心不斷消泯,柳宗元則始終高昂,陶淵明則是徹底避世。其次,這是因為蘇軾對人生價值的看法越來越接近陶淵明——委運任化,順其自然,這與柳宗元有大有不同。在此基礎(chǔ)上,蘇軾故意突出陶淵明人格中淡泊隱世的一面,忽略他的復(fù)雜性格,完成了對陶淵明人物形象的重構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:Since the new century, the study of the history of literary acceptance has become a hot topic in the field of ancient literature. Liu Zongyuan and Tao Yuanming are the classical writers in the field of poetry. Su Shi, as the first reader of the two people, is even more noticeable. Although there is a lot of research on Su Shi's Tao Liushi's poems, there are not enough details. The purpose of this paper is to describe the changing process of Su Shi's acceptance of Liu's poems in detail and the change of Su Shi's "abandoning Liu Guitao". There are three chapters in this paper. The first chapter mainly analyzes the general situation of Su Shi's acceptance of Liu Zongyuan: he has two distinct comments on Liu Zongyuan: one is affirmative evaluation to praise Liu poetry, the other is negative evaluation. It criticizes Liu Zongyuan's political career, philosophy and personal character. On the face of it, Su Shi made the above comments because, on the one hand, there was no solid political foundation for Liu Zongyuan's participation in the Yongzhen Reform, and Liu Zongyuan was defined as a rebel after his defeat, and the Song people's orthodoxy was extremely strong. But on the other hand, Liu Zongyuan's literary achievements are indeed high, thus, there will naturally be complex evaluation. But Su Shi was able to discover the value of Liu's poems for the first time in history because the poetics of Song Dynasty took plain beauty as the ultimate aesthetic model, which was not really established until Su Shi. In the second chapter, the author makes a detailed analysis of the concrete process and details of Su Shi's acceptance of Liu Shi's poems, and analyzes the effect of Liu Shi's poems on Su Shi. Su Shi's acceptance of Liu's poems was divided into four periods: two years before Yuanfeng of Shenzong; two years from Yuan Feng to YP in Yuan Dynasty; three years from Yuan Dynasty to eight years in Yuan Dynasty; and three years from Shengyuan Dynasty to the death of Su Shi. The second and fourth period is the high tide period accepted by Su Shi's Liu poetry, the first and the third period is the low tide period. At the same time, the second and fourth period is the low stage of Su Shi's career, the first and the third period is the high tide period. This contrast reflects the important role of Liu's poems in sushi's frustration. Liu Zongyuan's pro-reform stance made Su Shi, a New Party persecuted, hostile to him and unable to understand Liu Zongyuan. But after being demoted, Su Shi was able to have "understanding sympathy" for Liu Zongyuan. Liu Shi's consciousness of protest became one of his spiritual pillars, and the plainness in Liu's poem could also soothe Su Shi's soul. The third chapter mainly analyzes the reason why Su Shi abandoned Liu Guitao. Abandoning Liu Guitao means that Su Shi's acceptance of Tao Liu's poems was carried out at the same time, but with "he Tao's poem" as the symbol, Su Shi finally chose Tao poem as the model of poetry, and chose Yuan Ming as the model of life rather than Liu Zongyuan. First of all, this is because Su Shi's mind to join the WTO is constantly vanishing, the Liu Zongyuan is always high, and the Tao Yuanming is completely safe from the world. Second, this is because Su Shi's view of life value is getting closer to Tao Yuanming, letting go of nature, which is quite different from Liu Zongyuan. On this basis, Su Shi deliberately highlights the hidden side of Tao Yuanming personality, neglects his complex character, and completes the reconstruction of Tao Yuanming character.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I207.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙旭冉;;柳宗元酬贈詩的社會文化功用探究[J];齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年09期

2 何蕾;;“知者樂水”與“上善若水”——論柳詩“枯�！敝繹J];北京社會科學(xué);2016年06期

3 尹華君;;近三年柳宗元研究概述(2013-2015)[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期

4 梅華;;柳宗元文集的傳播與理學(xué)士群對其接受——以宋代文集序跋為視角[J];文藝評論;2015年12期

5 馬連菊;;柳宗元古體詩“至味”論[J];華夏文化論壇;2014年01期

6 尚永亮;;柳宗元古近體詩與表述類型之關(guān)聯(lián)及其創(chuàng)作動因[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2011年03期

7 李棟輝;;宋代柳宗元詩歌接受新論[J];柳州師專學(xué)報;2011年01期

8 李棟輝;;宋代柳宗元詩歌接受引論[J];玉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

9 張瑞君;;論莊子思想對蘇軾人生境界的影響[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

10 孫旭紅;;北宋《春秋》學(xué)的內(nèi)在理路及歷史價值[J];山西師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 吳增輝;北宋中后期貶謫與文學(xué)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

2 楊文榜;柳宗元及其詩歌研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

3 李建軍;宋代《春秋》學(xué)與宋型文化[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

4 洪迎華;劉柳詩歌明前傳播接受史研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 趙凱南;宋代詩學(xué)中的“自然”[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

2 陳可人;宋代“和陶詩”研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

3 王偉杰;宋代陶詩評論與宋詩平淡自然審美理想之構(gòu)建[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

4 熊文明;宋初儒學(xué)道統(tǒng)思想研究[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

5 邵飛;從陶詩評論看宋代詩學(xué)[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

6 莫軍苗;宋代批評視野中的柳宗元[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2008年

7 趙東麗;宋代柳宗元詩歌接受研究[D];河南大學(xué);2006年

8 趙雅娟;論蘇軾與其“南遷二友”[D];汕頭大學(xué);2006年

9 杜慧月;永貞革新與中唐文學(xué)[D];河南大學(xué);2005年

10 程建虎;唐代逐臣別詩研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2027930