本文選題：魯迅 + 階級論��； 參考：《魯迅研究月刊》2017年10期

【摘要】：正一對魯迅后期思想的研究存在兩種偏向。一種是貶抑前期而抬高后期,普遍的公式是"從進化論到階級論",認為魯迅后期實現(xiàn)了世界觀的偉大轉變,提升到馬克思主義的階級論高度;另一種是否定后期,認為魯迅后期進入了政治誤區(qū),中斷了前期發(fā)展到顛峰的文學創(chuàng)作,留下極大遺憾。我的觀點與這兩種傾向都有所不同,認為魯迅后期確實接受了階級論,但他的階級論與一般階級論是有區(qū)別的;中斷了發(fā)展到顛峰的《彷徨》《野草》時期的文學創(chuàng)作,的確
[Abstract]:There are two biases in the study of Lu Xun's late thought. The general formula is "from evolution to class theory," which holds that Lu Xun realized the great transformation of the world outlook and promoted it to the level of class theory of Marxism. The other is the later stage of negation. The author thinks that Lu Xun entered the political misunderstanding in the later period, and interrupted the literary creation which developed to the peak in the early stage, leaving great regret. My point of view is different from these two tendencies, and I think that Lu Xun did accept class theory in the later period, but his class theory and general class theory are different; and the literary creation of the period of "wandering to the peak", which developed to the peak of "weeds", was indeed interrupted.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院文學研究所;
【分類號】：I210

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 黃海澄;典型性僅僅是“階級性的集中表現(xiàn)”嗎?[J];廣西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1979年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 黃麗莉;“階級論”與“十七年”小說中愛情結局研究[D];西南大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2014554