本文選題：桐城派 + 歷史定位　； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2017年03期

【摘要】：有關(guān)桐城派的歷史定位,自五四以來大體有"謬種"說、"中介"說、"路障、橋梁"說三種,這是一個趨向深化的認識過程。應(yīng)該總結(jié)這些認識,自覺建立一種總體性辯證批判思維,并把這種思維方法貫徹到研究桐城派發(fā)生、發(fā)展的全過程及各主要側(cè)面。只有遵循辯證唯物論,秉持這種思維方法,才能給桐城派以準確定位,深化桐城派研究。這種方法對于與桐城派大體同一類型的那些"歷史中間物"的定位與研究,具有借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:Since the May 4th Movement, there have been three kinds of historical orientation of Tongcheng school, namely, "false" theory, "intermediary" theory and "roadblock and bridge" theory, which is a process of deepening understanding. We should sum up these understandings, consciously establish a kind of overall dialectical critical thinking, and carry out this thinking method to study the whole process and main aspects of Tongcheng School's occurrence and development. Only by adhering to dialectical materialism and adhering to this thinking method can Tongcheng school be accurately positioned and the study of Tongcheng school be deepened. This method can be used for reference for the positioning and research of historical intermediates of the same type as Tongcheng School.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號】：K207;I209

【相似文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 郝敬堂;;小崗之子[J];中國作家;2010年02期

中國重要會議論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 馮乃康;;歷史定位與理論闡釋——深入《徐霞客游記》文學(xué)研究的兩點思考[A];徐霞客與中國旅游文化學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文匯編[C];2003年

，

本文編號：1857842