本文選題：王樵 + 《尚書日記》�。� 參考：《重慶師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：王樵《尚書日記》是明代《尚書》學(xué)的著聞之作。筆者前后經(jīng)眼該書六個(gè)版本:萬(wàn)歷十年于明照刻本、萬(wàn)歷二十三年彭燧刻本、萬(wàn)歷二十五年蔡立身刻本、萬(wàn)歷王錫琛重修本、崇禎五年莊繼光重修本、文淵閣《四庫(kù)全書》本。其中,于本在著書體例與文本內(nèi)容上與后諸版本差別甚大,可單獨(dú)視為一個(gè)版本系統(tǒng)。后一版本系統(tǒng)以彭本為祖本。將于本和彭本視作前后系統(tǒng)的代表來(lái)對(duì)比,可以窺觀王樵修改《日記》之部分情況,進(jìn)而發(fā)現(xiàn)作者日漸醇熟的《書》學(xué)見(jiàn)識(shí)和著述動(dòng)機(jī)由詮釋文本向關(guān)懷現(xiàn)實(shí)的側(cè)重。蔡本為彭本的重刻本,對(duì)彭本之誤稍有訂正,因此訛誤最少,可作為整理底本之選。四庫(kù)本訛、脫、衍、倒諸誤較多,致誤原因繁雜,尤其是因政治原因而產(chǎn)生的改竄,常常令文本失去原意,故而引用之時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)謹(jǐn)慎�！度沼洝分饨�(jīng)特色既有承自前人之成分,如訓(xùn)詁與義理并重、兼涉考證和闕疑原則,又受明代思潮走向和晚明社會(huì)局勢(shì)影響,表現(xiàn)出注重心性工夫和不拘于經(jīng)文,參以歷史,貼近現(xiàn)實(shí)的特點(diǎn)。與之相對(duì)應(yīng)地,《日記》之解經(jīng)思想則主要可歸為兩橛:以心為主、以敬為核的心性工夫和通經(jīng)致用、裨補(bǔ)現(xiàn)實(shí)的經(jīng)世思想。若從宏觀的學(xué)術(shù)史與思想史的角度,聯(lián)系明代中晚期學(xué)風(fēng)思潮窺觀王樵及其《日記》,則《日記》中的漢學(xué)(訓(xùn)詁與考據(jù))成就,不能說(shuō)沒(méi)有受到明代中后期學(xué)風(fēng)漸變的影響;認(rèn)識(shí)到心學(xué)的狂肆對(duì)社會(huì)人心的破壞后,王樵在更加重視朱學(xué)“主敬”工夫論時(shí),突出個(gè)體在德性養(yǎng)成中的主體性與能動(dòng)性,契合明代整體思想逐漸內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)的趨向;同時(shí),在感受到本朝山雨欲來(lái)的危機(jī)局勢(shì)時(shí),作為官員型學(xué)者的他借鑒前賢,立足當(dāng)下,既強(qiáng)調(diào)從道德層面規(guī)范社會(huì)風(fēng)氣,又主張以實(shí)務(wù)精神與行政技能推動(dòng)國(guó)家體制、機(jī)制的改革與完善。由此,王樵及其《日記》或可視作明代中晚期漢宋學(xué)、朱王學(xué)、道器學(xué)之變化整合的一個(gè)具體個(gè)案。
[Abstract]:Wang Qiao's Diary of Shang Shu is a masterpiece of the study of Shang Shu in Ming Dynasty. The author before and after six editions of the book: Wanli ten years in Ming Zhao, Wanli 23 years Peng Sui engraved, Wanli 25 years Cai Li-Shen engraved, Wanli Wang Xichen, Chongzhen five years Chuang Jiguang revision, Wen Yuan GE < Siku >. Among them, Yu Ben in the style of writing and text content and the latter versions are very different, can be considered as a separate version system. The latter version of the system is based on Peng Ben. By comparing this book with Peng Ben as the representative of the system before and after, we can see some of Wang Qiao's revision of the Diary, and then find out that the author's knowledge and motivation of learning and writing from the text to the care of reality is more and more important. Cai Ben is Peng Ben's reprint, a slight correction to Peng Ben's error, therefore, the least error, can be used as the choice of finishing the original version. There are many errors in the original books, especially in the political reasons, which often make the text lose its original intention, so it should be used with caution. The characteristics of the interpretation of the "Diary" have some elements which are inherited from the predecessors. For example, both exegesis and justice, and the principles of textual research and doubt, are influenced by the trend of thought in the Ming Dynasty and the social situation in the late Ming Dynasty, showing the characteristics of paying attention to mental work and not taking into account scriptures, referring to history and approaching the reality. Correspondingly, the thought of "Diary" can be classified into two chunks: the heart is the main part, the heart is the core and the meridian is used to complement the practical thoughts of the world. From the point of view of macroscopic academic history and ideological history, we can see Wang Qiao's view of the style of study in the middle and late Ming Dynasty and his Diary, then the achievements of Sinology (exegesis and textual research) in Diary can not be said to have been influenced by the gradual change of the style of study in the middle and late Ming Dynasty. Recognizing the destruction of the social people caused by the madness of the study of the mind, when Wang Qiao paid more attention to the theory of "master and respect" in Zhu's study, he highlighted the subjectivity and initiative of the individual in the cultivation of virtue, which was in line with the tendency of the whole thought of the Ming Dynasty gradually turning inwards; at the same time, When he felt the crisis situation coming from the mountains and rain, he, as an official scholar, drew lessons from his predecessors and established himself at the present time, emphasizing not only standardizing social ethos from the moral level, but also advocating the promotion of the state system with practical spirit and administrative skills. Reform and perfection of mechanism. Therefore, Wang Qiao and his Diary may be regarded as a concrete case of the change and integration of Han and Song studies, Zhu Wangxue and Taoism in the middle and late Ming Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I207.62

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 秦峰;;劉宗周對(duì)“十六字心傳”的詮釋[J];中國(guó)哲學(xué)史;2014年02期

2 江曦;;張爾岐《書經(jīng)直解》辨?zhèn)蝃J];圖書館雜志;2014年03期

3 翟奎鳳;邱振華;;以《易》解《范》,漢宋交融——黃道周《洪范明義》思想研究[J];周易研究;2013年06期

4 劉衛(wèi)武;劉亮;;明代坊間印書成本考[J];圖書館雜志;2011年03期

5 蘇新紅;;明代“太倉(cāng)庫(kù)”稱謂考[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

6 周祖貽;譚達(dá)全;劉銳;;明代醫(yī)家王肯堂醫(yī)學(xué)成就研究[J];湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年09期

7 高原樂(lè);;《尚書考異》版本比較研究[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

8 方志遠(yuǎn);;“山人”與晚明政局[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年01期

9 姜廣輝;;梅澾《尚書譜》的“武斷”與創(chuàng)獲[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

10 陳立勝;;身體之為“竅”:宋明儒學(xué)中的身體本體論建構(gòu)[J];世界哲學(xué);2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 李言;《千頃堂書目》新證[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

2 牛敬飛;五岳祭祀演變考論[D];清華大學(xué);2012年

3 史振卿;清代《尚書》學(xué)若干問(wèn)題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

4 張兵;《洪范》詮釋研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 杭義梅;王樵及其《方麓集》研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2015年

2 陳敏;申時(shí)行及其《書經(jīng)講義會(huì)編》研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

3 余勁東;明代京察制度研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2013年

4 李霞;明代尚書學(xué)文獻(xiàn)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

5 李娟;《尚書·堯典》研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2010年

6 郭永琴;《尚書·禹貢》中的貢賦研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1786225