本文選題：清華簡　切入點：先秦　出處：《上海師范大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：清華簡主要涉及經(jīng)、史類文獻,具有很高的學術(shù)價值。到目前為止,已經(jīng)公布的清華簡中與樂詩有關(guān)的是《耆夜》、《周公之琴舞》、《芮良夫毖》三篇文獻。本文對清華簡樂詩及先秦《詩》類文獻的研究也主要圍繞這三篇文獻展開。本文共分為四章:第一章:筆者首先對清華簡樂詩的成書年代進行考證。清華簡經(jīng)過碳14測定,其出土年代約是戰(zhàn)國中晚期,但并不能簡單的將三篇清華簡詩類文獻的成書年代都歸為戰(zhàn)國中晚期。戰(zhàn)國中晚期僅是其抄寫年代,具體的創(chuàng)作年代,要根據(jù)樂詩考訂。通過出土文獻與傳世文獻對比,筆者斷定《耆夜》樂詩的成書年代在西周中期到春秋時期�！吨芄傥琛肥侵艹跄甑淖髌�,而《芮良夫毖》是西周末年周厲王時期的樂詩。第二章:在本章中對清華簡的真?zhèn)芜M行了考辨。自清華簡問世,學者們圍繞清華簡真?zhèn)握归_激烈爭論,但多數(shù)從技術(shù)或史事方面進行討論。筆者試圖從樂詩的角度證明清華簡為真。主要從清華簡樂詩的用詞、用韻方面對其真?zhèn)芜M行鑒別。通過考證,筆者認為清華簡是真簡,絕非現(xiàn)代人偽造。第三章:本章對清華簡樂詩與“孔子刪詩”問題進行了研究�！翱鬃觿h詩”問題在史學界一直爭論不休,沒有定論。而清華簡樂詩的面世為研究“孔子刪詩”問題提供了新史料。筆者認為,《詩經(jīng)》在孔子之前就有固定的版本在流傳,清華簡樂詩的出土為孔子可能編訂《詩經(jīng)》的觀點提供了證據(jù)。筆者從孔子生平結(jié)合春秋時期朝聘賦詩背景進行論證,得出孔子僅是對《詩經(jīng)》的文字進行潤色,對《詩經(jīng)》的章節(jié)進行編排,并沒有刪去《詩經(jīng)》的篇目。第四章:在前三章研究清華簡的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者總結(jié)出了先秦時期《詩》類文獻的一些特點。主要表現(xiàn)為:在流傳版本方面,先秦時期《詩經(jīng)》版本繁多,多通假字,并且有逸詩存在;在流傳地域方面,先秦時期《詩經(jīng)》流傳的地域?qū)拸V;在影響方面,先秦時期《詩經(jīng)》影響深遠。
[Abstract]:Qinghua Bamboo slips are mainly concerned with classics and historical literature, which are of high academic value. So far, The published three documents in the Qing Hua bamboo slips related to music poems are "the night of the aged", "the piano dance of Zhou Gong" and "Ruiliangfu avoid". The research of this paper also focuses on these three documents. The paper is divided into four chapters: chapter one: the author first makes textual research on the writing age of the Jianle poems of Tsinghua, which is determined by carbon 14. The unearthed period is about the middle and late warring States period, but it can not be simply classified as the middle and late warring States period. By comparing the unearthed literature with the literature handed down, the author concludes that the writing time of the music poems was from the middle of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn period. "the piano and dance of the Duke of Zhou" is the work of the early Zhou Dynasty. "Rui Liangfu avoid" is a musical poem of Zhou Liwang's period in the late Western Zhou Dynasty. Chapter two: in this chapter, the authenticity of Tsinghua Bamboo slips has been studied and distinguished. Since the birth of Tsinghua Bamboo slips, scholars have started a heated debate about the authenticity of Tsinghua Bamboo slips. But most of them are discussed from the aspects of technology or history. The author tries to prove that Tsinghua Jian is true from the point of view of music poetry. Mainly from the point of view of the words of Qing Hua Jian Yue poem, the author uses rhyme to identify its authenticity. Through textual research, the author thinks that Tsinghua bamboo slips are true. Chapter three: this chapter studies the problems of "Confucius deleting poetry" and "Qing Hua Jian Le poem". "Confucius censored poem" has been debated endlessly in the field of history. There is no final conclusion. However, the appearance of the Qing Hua Jian Yue poem provides new historical data for studying the issue of "Confucius deleting poetry." the author believes that the Book of songs had a fixed version in circulation before Confucius. The unearthed poems of Jian Le in Qinghua provide evidence for the viewpoint that Confucius may compile the Book of songs. The author demonstrates Confucius' life and life combined with the background of the Chao-pengfu poem during the Spring and Autumn period, and concludes that Confucius only embellished the text of the Book of songs. The chapters of the Book of songs were arranged without deleting the title of the Book of songs. Chapter 4th: on the basis of the previous three chapters of the study of Tsinghua slips, The author summarizes some characteristics of the literature of "poem" in the pre-Qin period. The main manifestations are as follows: there are many versions of the "Book of songs" in the pre-Qin period, and there are many false characters, and there are free poems, and in the area of circulation, there are many versions of the "Book of songs" in the pre-Qin period. The Book of songs in the pre-Qin period has a wide range of territory, and has a profound influence on the influence of the Book of songs in the pre-Qin period.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I207.22

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡平生;韓自強;;阜陽漢簡《詩經(jīng)》簡論[J];文物;1984年08期

2 張文勛;以“政教”為中心的先秦儒家文藝思想[J];文史哲;1986年04期

3 黃宏信;;阜陽漢簡《詩經(jīng)》異文研究[J];江漢考古;1989年01期

4 陳偉;郭店楚簡別釋[J];江漢考古;1998年04期

5 周桂鈿;《郭店楚墓竹簡·緇衣》研究札記[J];孔子研究;1999年01期

6 傅道彬;“詩可以觀”——春秋時代的觀詩風尚及詩學意義[J];文學評論;2004年05期

7 晁福林;從王權(quán)觀念變化看上博簡《詩論》的作者及時代[J];中國社會科學;2002年06期

8 高華平;上博簡《孔子詩論》的論詩特色及其作者問題[J];華中師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2002年05期

9 晁福林;從上博簡《詩論》對于《木瓜》篇的評析看《詩經(jīng)》編纂問題[J];史學史研究;2005年01期

10 弭良滿;;《詩經(jīng)》宴飲詩探析[J];遼寧師范大學學報;2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 晁天義;周學軍;;學界圍繞清華簡《耆夜》真?zhèn)握归_激辯[N];中國社會科學報;2013年

2 付林鵬;;由清華簡《(耆)夜·樂詩》看周公的巫祝身份[N];中國文物報;2010年

，

本文編號：1566020