中國(guó)C9高校學(xué)科布局及跨學(xué)科科研生產(chǎn)力比較研究
本文選題:C9高校 + 學(xué)科布局; 參考:《南京大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:科研成果是反映機(jī)構(gòu)科研水平和實(shí)力的重要指標(biāo),運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)方法對(duì)機(jī)構(gòu)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行多角度分析是評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)構(gòu)科研實(shí)力的重要手段。C9高校作為國(guó)內(nèi)最頂級(jí)的高等院校,是中國(guó)建設(shè)世界一流大學(xué)的主力軍。了解C9高校目前的學(xué)科布局、學(xué)科發(fā)展速度、合作機(jī)構(gòu)等科研現(xiàn)狀,能夠?yàn)楦鱾(gè)高校調(diào)整科研政策,提升綜合科研實(shí)力提供客觀依據(jù)。 本文以Scopus數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)為數(shù)據(jù)來源,首先利用文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)方法和可視化方法對(duì)我國(guó)C9高校2007.2011年的科研產(chǎn)出進(jìn)行了調(diào)研和分析:從科研產(chǎn)出數(shù)量和學(xué)科布局角度對(duì)比分析了C9各高校的研究規(guī)模和優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科;從領(lǐng)先條件和波士頓矩陣角度對(duì)比分析了C9高校的科研成果在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、影響力和先進(jìn)程度方面的表現(xiàn),并對(duì)其科研成果的發(fā)展速度進(jìn)行了比較分析:從合作機(jī)構(gòu)方面展示了C9高校合作的廣度和深度。 在對(duì)C9高校整體科研產(chǎn)出分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文利用SciVal Spotlight分析工具對(duì)C9高校的跨學(xué)科研究成果進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步分析,從科研產(chǎn)出數(shù)量、領(lǐng)先條件、增長(zhǎng)速率、研究領(lǐng)域、研究主題五個(gè)角度充分展示了C9高校在跨學(xué)科研究中的研究規(guī)模、優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科、發(fā)展速度等方面的表現(xiàn)。 另外,論文對(duì)南京大學(xué)的學(xué)科布局和跨學(xué)科科研生產(chǎn)力進(jìn)行了單獨(dú)的分析,從南京大學(xué)的科研產(chǎn)出數(shù)量、優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科、波士頓矩陣、跨學(xué)科研究領(lǐng)域分布、合作機(jī)構(gòu)和高產(chǎn)作者六個(gè)角度出發(fā),將南京大學(xué)的科研產(chǎn)出與C9其他高校進(jìn)行縱向?qū)Ρ?客觀評(píng)價(jià)了南京大學(xué)的科研水平和實(shí)力在國(guó)內(nèi)同行中的地位。 最后,論文對(duì)研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行了總結(jié),闡明了論文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和研究局限。雖然我國(guó)C9高校在科學(xué)研究中表現(xiàn)出了積極的參與并且取得了一定的科研成果,但是C9高校與世界一流大學(xué)還有較大的差距。C9各個(gè)高校在進(jìn)行科研活動(dòng)時(shí)應(yīng)該根據(jù)實(shí)際情況調(diào)整科研策略、積極加強(qiáng)合作與交流,從多個(gè)方面增加科研實(shí)力,為創(chuàng)建世界一流大學(xué)不斷努力。
[Abstract]:Scientific research achievement is an important index to reflect the scientific research level and strength of institutions. Using bibliometrics to analyze institutional literature from multiple angles is an important means to evaluate the scientific research strength of institutions. C9 colleges and universities are the top universities in China. China is the main force in the construction of world-class universities. Understanding the present subject layout, the speed of discipline development and the scientific research status of cooperative institutions in C9 colleges and universities can provide an objective basis for the adjustment of scientific research policies and the promotion of comprehensive scientific research strength in various colleges and universities. This paper takes the Scopus database as the data source, Firstly, this paper makes a survey and analysis of the scientific research output of C9 universities in China in 2007 and 2011 by means of bibliometrics and visualization. From the perspective of the quantity of scientific research outputs and the distribution of subjects, this paper compares and analyzes the research scale and dominant disciplines of C9 colleges and universities. From the point of view of leading conditions and Boston matrix, this paper compares and analyzes the performance of scientific research achievements of C9 universities in terms of competitiveness, influence and advanced degree. The development speed of its scientific research achievements is compared and analyzed: the breadth and depth of cooperation in C9 colleges and universities are shown from the aspect of cooperative institutions. Based on the analysis of the overall scientific research output of C9 colleges and universities, this paper uses SciVal Spotlight analysis tool to further analyze the interdisciplinary research results of C9 colleges and universities, including the quantity of scientific research output, the leading conditions, the growth rate and the research field. The research theme shows the performance of C9 universities in cross-disciplinary research, such as research scale, advantage discipline, development speed and so on. In addition, the thesis makes a separate analysis of the subject layout and interdisciplinary scientific research productivity of Nanjing University, from the distribution of the number of scientific research outputs, the dominant disciplines, the Boston matrix, and the interdisciplinary research field of Nanjing University. The scientific research output of Nanjing University is compared with that of other C9 universities from six angles of cooperative institution and high-yield author, and the position of scientific research level and strength of Nanjing University in domestic counterparts is evaluated objectively. Finally, the paper summarizes the research results, explains the innovation of the paper and research limitations. Although C9 colleges and universities in China have shown active participation in scientific research and have made certain achievements in scientific research, However, there is still a big gap between C9 universities and world-class universities. C9 colleges and universities should adjust their scientific research strategies according to the actual conditions, actively strengthen cooperation and exchanges, and increase their scientific research strength from many aspects. To create a world-class university and continue to work hard.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:G644
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張煒;德國(guó)柏林工業(yè)大學(xué)的跨學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)組織[J];比較教育研究;2003年09期
2 姚云;康瑜;;中國(guó)教育科研成果如何走向世界——基于對(duì)SSCI數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)分析的啟示[J];比較教育研究;2007年01期
3 華薇娜;周海花;王婷婷;;中國(guó)博物館界科研成果走向世界的歷史進(jìn)程——基于Web of Science數(shù)據(jù)的檢索與分析[J];博物館研究;2011年02期
4 黨亞茹;;基于SSCI的中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究國(guó)際合著分布研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期
5 胡惠芳,萬躍華;SCI、SSCI收錄的圖書情報(bào)學(xué)學(xué)科期刊評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)[J];大學(xué)圖書館學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期
6 曾玉清;;高?蒲挟a(chǎn)出評(píng)價(jià)方法及應(yīng)用研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期
7 李麗潔;;美國(guó)研究型大學(xué)的“多學(xué)科研究”——組織的視角[J];大學(xué)(研究與評(píng)價(jià));2009年04期
8 朱軍文;劉念才;;我國(guó)研究型大學(xué)科研產(chǎn)出的計(jì)量學(xué)分析[J];高等教育研究;2009年02期
9 劉莉;劉念才;;1978-2007年我國(guó)大陸與我國(guó)臺(tái)灣、韓國(guó)、日本高校SSCI論文的比較研究[J];高等教育研究;2009年12期
10 尹群;劉洋;王云鵬;顧來紅;;我國(guó)研究型大學(xué)跨學(xué)科組織建設(shè)研究[J];黑龍江教育(高教研究與評(píng)估);2009年Z1期
,本文編號(hào):1792203
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenshubaike/mishujinen/1792203.html