基于logistic回歸的影響國際合作論文主導(dǎo)地位的因素分析——以中日比較研究為視角
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-19 03:34
【摘要】：[目的/意義]分析影響國際合作論文主導(dǎo)地位的因素情況,可以為尋找提升我國國際合作論文主導(dǎo)地位的途徑等方面提供參考依據(jù)。[過程/方法]以2014年SCI收錄的中國和日本各自的國際合作論文數(shù)據(jù)為研究對象,比較分析影響論文主導(dǎo)地位的因素并構(gòu)建Logistic回歸模型,從影響與否、影響程度、影響方向等方面明確中日異同點。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]研究發(fā)現(xiàn):與日本相比,當國際合作論文所屬學(xué)科類別為理學(xué)或工學(xué)、類型為論文/文獻類或評論類、語種為其他、被資助的基金數(shù)量越多、流向為國內(nèi)時,中國更容易出現(xiàn)主導(dǎo)論文,更易有話語權(quán)。因此,可以從加強我國期刊質(zhì)量、吸引不同層次的國內(nèi)外資助基金等方式來有效提升我國論文主導(dǎo)地位。
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] the analysis of the factors that affect the dominant position of international cooperative papers can provide a reference for finding ways to improve the dominant position of international cooperative papers in China. [process / methods] taking the data of Chinese and Japanese international cooperative papers collected by SCI in 2014 as the research object, this paper compares and analyzes the factors that affect the dominant position of the paper and constructs the Logistic regression model, and clarifies the similarities and differences between China and Japan from the aspects of influence, influence degree, influence direction and so on. [results / conclusion] compared with Japan, when the subject category of international cooperative paper is Neo-Confucianism or engineering, the type is paper / literature class or comment type, and the language is other, the more funds funded, the more funds flow to China, which is more likely to appear leading papers and have a say in China. Therefore, we can effectively enhance the dominant position of papers in China by strengthening the quality of periodicals and attracting different levels of domestic and foreign funding funds.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：G353.1
本文編號：2502045
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] the analysis of the factors that affect the dominant position of international cooperative papers can provide a reference for finding ways to improve the dominant position of international cooperative papers in China. [process / methods] taking the data of Chinese and Japanese international cooperative papers collected by SCI in 2014 as the research object, this paper compares and analyzes the factors that affect the dominant position of the paper and constructs the Logistic regression model, and clarifies the similarities and differences between China and Japan from the aspects of influence, influence degree, influence direction and so on. [results / conclusion] compared with Japan, when the subject category of international cooperative paper is Neo-Confucianism or engineering, the type is paper / literature class or comment type, and the language is other, the more funds funded, the more funds flow to China, which is more likely to appear leading papers and have a say in China. Therefore, we can effectively enhance the dominant position of papers in China by strengthening the quality of periodicals and attracting different levels of domestic and foreign funding funds.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：G353.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 聶建霞;;圖書館國際合作與學(xué)術(shù)交流策略初探[J];農(nóng)業(yè)圖書情報學(xué)刊;2008年06期
2 許淳熙;;淺談圖書館的國際合作[J];圖書館雜志;2001年09期
3 譚曉;張志強;韓濤;;基礎(chǔ)科學(xué)國際合作的測度和分析[J];圖書情報知識;2013年02期
4 胡俊榮;論圖書館國際化[J];中國圖書館學(xué)報;2003年03期
5 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李瑛;高校國際合作科學(xué)計量研究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年
2 王俊婧;國際合作對科研論文質(zhì)量的影響研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2502045
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/tushudanganlunwen/2502045.html
