【摘要】：有關(guān)明代的銅活字問(wèn)題,傳統(tǒng)上認(rèn)為是中國(guó)印刷術(shù)的重要成就,向無(wú)異議。但近些年來(lái)對(duì)這一問(wèn)題的辨析認(rèn)為,明代并無(wú)銅活字,所謂的明代銅活字實(shí)際上是錫活字,動(dòng)搖了傳統(tǒng)說(shuō)法的根基。新說(shuō)固然言之有理,但仍需要對(duì)華氏以"銅板"擺字是一種技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的準(zhǔn)確性、"銅板(版)"的真正涵義、傳世文獻(xiàn)中關(guān)于明代銅活字的記載內(nèi)容、異域文獻(xiàn)材料內(nèi)容和明代用銅情況進(jìn)行仔細(xì)的分析。因此,明代存在銅活字的說(shuō)法不能輕易否定。
[Abstract]:The problem of copper movable type in Ming Dynasty has traditionally been regarded as an important achievement of Chinese printing. However, in recent years, it is believed that there was no copper movable type in Ming Dynasty, and the so-called copper movable type in Ming Dynasty was actually tin movable type, which shook the foundation of traditional saying. Although the new statement is reasonable, it is still necessary to put the word "copper plate" in Fahrenheit as a kind of accuracy of technological innovation, the true meaning of "copper plate (edition)", and the contents of the Ming Dynasty copper movable type recorded in the handed down literature. The contents of foreign literature and copper in Ming Dynasty were carefully analyzed. Therefore, the Ming Dynasty, the existence of copper movable type can not be easily denied.
【作者單位】： 北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：G256;TS811
，

本文編號(hào)：2405639