中日印韓科技期刊作者國際化水平及學術(shù)影響力分析與評價
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-31 08:52
【摘要】：科技期刊的作者國際化水平是評價一種期刊國際化程度和學術(shù)影響力的重要依據(jù)。1980-1990年間,科學傳播的國際化進程就已經(jīng)被廣泛提及,科技期刊作為傳播科技知識和學術(shù)成果的重要載體,其國際化程度也被越來越多的國內(nèi)外學者廣泛關(guān)注并一時成為業(yè)界討論的熱點。眾多學者認為,科技期刊的國際化表現(xiàn)在諸多方面,如論文質(zhì)量的國際化、作者的國際化、讀者的國際化、出版語言的國際化、編委構(gòu)成的國際化、審稿的國際化、編排標準的國際化、編輯管理的國際化、印刷質(zhì)量的國際化以及入選檢索系統(tǒng)的國際化。其中,作者國際化是其顯著特征之一。為分析和評價中、日、印、韓四國科技期刊作者國際化水平,探討4個國家科技期刊作者國際化水平與其學術(shù)影響力的關(guān)系,以2015年版JCR數(shù)據(jù)庫中收錄的中、日、印、韓四國的149種SCI來源期刊為研究對象,其中中國39種,日本63種,印度23種,韓國24種,分別計算各期刊作者國際化分數(shù)(Fraction of Author Internationalization,FAI)(包括FAI1和FAI2)和作者國際化指數(shù)(Index of Author Internationalization,IAI)(包括IAI1和IAI2)比較中、日、印、韓四國期刊作者國際化水平,對4個國家期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2與影響因子進行相關(guān)分析,確定不同國家期刊作者國際化水平與學術(shù)影響力的關(guān)系。結(jié)果顯示,(1)中國期刊FAI1、FAI2和IAI1最低,分別為0.230±0.167、0.382±0.233和0.0837±0.701;日本期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2均為最高,分別為0.480±0.230、0.579±0.276、0.162±0.084和0.223±0.110;印度期刊IAI2(0.135±0.752)。ANOVA檢驗結(jié)果顯示四國FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.000,P=0.002,P=0.000和P=0.003)。中國與日本期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000和P=0.023);中國期刊分別與印度和韓國期刊FAI1相比差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.006,P=0.011);日本與印度期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.020,P=0.046,P=0.007和P=0.001);日本與韓國期刊的IAI1相比差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.022),印度與韓國期刊IAI2相比差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.005)。其他國家間的作者國際化指標相比差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義。(2)中、日、印、韓四國影響因子分別為1.912±1.782、1.685±0.949、0.643±0.305和1.345±0.932。中國與印度期刊影響因子、日本與印度期刊影響因子以及印度與韓國期刊影響因子差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P值分別為0.000,0.000,和0.002)。(3)Pearson相關(guān)性檢驗結(jié)果顯示中國期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2與影響因子的相關(guān)系數(shù)分別為0.336(P=0.036)、0.551(P=0.000)、0.573(P=0.000)和0.720(P=0.000),差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義。其他國家二者之間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。以上結(jié)果提示(1)日本期刊作者國際化水平最高,中國最低。(2)印度期刊影響因子最低,中國、日本、韓國水平相當。(3)中國期刊作者國際化水平的提高對期刊學術(shù)影響力的提升具有積極作用,其他3個國家期刊作者國際化水平與期刊學術(shù)影響力無關(guān)。
[Abstract]:The level of internationalization of authors of sci-tech journals is an important basis for evaluating the degree of internationalization and academic influence of a journal. From 1980 to 1990, the process of internationalization of scientific communication has been widely mentioned. As an important carrier to disseminate scientific and technological knowledge and academic achievements, the degree of internationalization of sci-tech periodicals has been paid more and more attention by scholars at home and abroad and has become a hot topic in the field of discussion. Many scholars believe that the internationalization of sci-tech periodicals is manifested in many aspects, such as the internationalization of the quality of papers, the internationalization of authors, the internationalization of readers, the internationalization of publishing languages, the internationalization of the composition of editorial boards, and the internationalization of the review of manuscripts. Internationalization of layout standards, management of editors, internationalization of printing quality and internationalization of selected retrieval systems. Among them, author internationalization is one of its prominent characteristics. In order to analyze and evaluate the internationalized level of Chinese, Japanese, Indian and Korean sci-tech journal authors, and to explore the relationship between the authors' internationalization level and their academic influence in the four countries, the authors' international level and their academic influence are discussed in the 2015 edition of the JCR database, which includes China, Japan and India. 149 SCI journals from Korea, China, Japan, India and South Korea were studied, 39 of them were from China, 63 from Japan, 23 from India and 24 from South Korea, respectively. The international scores of journal authors were calculated by (Fraction of Author Internationalization,. FAI) (includes FAI1 and FAI2) and author internationalization index (Index of Author Internationalization,IAI) (including IAI1 and IAI2). The correlation between IAI1 and IAI2 and influencing factors was analyzed to determine the relationship between the internationalization level of journal authors and academic influence in different countries. The results showed that (1) the FAI1,FAI2 and IAI1 of Chinese periodicals were the lowest (0.230 鹵0.167 鹵0.382 鹵0.233 and 0.0837 鹵0.701, respectively); The FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 of Japanese periodicals were the highest (0.480 鹵0.230, 0.579 鹵0.276, 0.162 鹵0.084 and 0.223 鹵0.110, respectively). The results of IAI2 (0.135 鹵0.752). ANOVA) test showed that there were significant differences between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in the four countries (P0. 000, P0. 002, P0. 000 and P0. 003). There were significant differences in FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between China and Japan (P0. 000, P0. 000 and P0. 023). The difference of FAI1 between Chinese journals and Indian and Korean periodicals was statistically significant (P0. 006 / P0. 011). The difference of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between Japan and India was statistically significant (P0. 020, P0. 046, P0. 007 and P0. 001). The difference of IAI1 between Japanese and Korean journals was statistically significant (P0. 022), and the difference between Indian and Korean periodicals IAI2 was statistically significant (P0. 005). (2) the influencing factors of China, Japan, India and Korea were 1.912 鹵1.7821.685 鹵0.949 鹵0.643 鹵0.305 and 1.345 鹵0.932, respectively. The influence factors of Chinese and Indian periodicals, Japanese and Indian journals and Indian and Korean periodicals were significantly different (P = 0.000, P < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in Chinese periodicals were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively, and the correlation coefficients of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively. The difference was statistically significant between 0.573 (P0. 000) and 0.720 (P0. 000). There was no statistical difference between the other countries. The above results suggest that (1) Japanese journal authors have the highest internationalization level, while China is the lowest. (2) Indian journals have the lowest influencing factors, China, Japan, (3) the improvement of the internationalization level of Chinese periodical writers has a positive effect on the promotion of journal academic influence, but the other three countries have nothing to do with the academic influence of periodicals.
【學位授予單位】：新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G353.1
本文編號：2301577
[Abstract]:The level of internationalization of authors of sci-tech journals is an important basis for evaluating the degree of internationalization and academic influence of a journal. From 1980 to 1990, the process of internationalization of scientific communication has been widely mentioned. As an important carrier to disseminate scientific and technological knowledge and academic achievements, the degree of internationalization of sci-tech periodicals has been paid more and more attention by scholars at home and abroad and has become a hot topic in the field of discussion. Many scholars believe that the internationalization of sci-tech periodicals is manifested in many aspects, such as the internationalization of the quality of papers, the internationalization of authors, the internationalization of readers, the internationalization of publishing languages, the internationalization of the composition of editorial boards, and the internationalization of the review of manuscripts. Internationalization of layout standards, management of editors, internationalization of printing quality and internationalization of selected retrieval systems. Among them, author internationalization is one of its prominent characteristics. In order to analyze and evaluate the internationalized level of Chinese, Japanese, Indian and Korean sci-tech journal authors, and to explore the relationship between the authors' internationalization level and their academic influence in the four countries, the authors' international level and their academic influence are discussed in the 2015 edition of the JCR database, which includes China, Japan and India. 149 SCI journals from Korea, China, Japan, India and South Korea were studied, 39 of them were from China, 63 from Japan, 23 from India and 24 from South Korea, respectively. The international scores of journal authors were calculated by (Fraction of Author Internationalization,. FAI) (includes FAI1 and FAI2) and author internationalization index (Index of Author Internationalization,IAI) (including IAI1 and IAI2). The correlation between IAI1 and IAI2 and influencing factors was analyzed to determine the relationship between the internationalization level of journal authors and academic influence in different countries. The results showed that (1) the FAI1,FAI2 and IAI1 of Chinese periodicals were the lowest (0.230 鹵0.167 鹵0.382 鹵0.233 and 0.0837 鹵0.701, respectively); The FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 of Japanese periodicals were the highest (0.480 鹵0.230, 0.579 鹵0.276, 0.162 鹵0.084 and 0.223 鹵0.110, respectively). The results of IAI2 (0.135 鹵0.752). ANOVA) test showed that there were significant differences between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in the four countries (P0. 000, P0. 002, P0. 000 and P0. 003). There were significant differences in FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between China and Japan (P0. 000, P0. 000 and P0. 023). The difference of FAI1 between Chinese journals and Indian and Korean periodicals was statistically significant (P0. 006 / P0. 011). The difference of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between Japan and India was statistically significant (P0. 020, P0. 046, P0. 007 and P0. 001). The difference of IAI1 between Japanese and Korean journals was statistically significant (P0. 022), and the difference between Indian and Korean periodicals IAI2 was statistically significant (P0. 005). (2) the influencing factors of China, Japan, India and Korea were 1.912 鹵1.7821.685 鹵0.949 鹵0.643 鹵0.305 and 1.345 鹵0.932, respectively. The influence factors of Chinese and Indian periodicals, Japanese and Indian journals and Indian and Korean periodicals were significantly different (P = 0.000, P < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in Chinese periodicals were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively, and the correlation coefficients of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively. The difference was statistically significant between 0.573 (P0. 000) and 0.720 (P0. 000). There was no statistical difference between the other countries. The above results suggest that (1) Japanese journal authors have the highest internationalization level, while China is the lowest. (2) Indian journals have the lowest influencing factors, China, Japan, (3) the improvement of the internationalization level of Chinese periodical writers has a positive effect on the promotion of journal academic influence, but the other three countries have nothing to do with the academic influence of periodicals.
【學位授予單位】：新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G353.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃鋒;黃雅意;辛亮;;中英文雙語出版對中國科技期刊國際化的啟示[J];中國科技期刊研究;2016年11期
2 馬健生;蔡娟;;教育國際化領(lǐng)域的研究進展與趨勢——基于WoS期刊文獻的可視化分析[J];外國教育研究;2016年10期
3 王晴;駱筱秋;;科技期刊國際化辦刊及媒體融合發(fā)展的探索與實踐——以《國際口腔科學雜志(英文版)》為例[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2016年10期
4 劉雪立;周晶;蓋雙雙;盛麗娜;付中靜;董建軍;方紅玲;;基于被引頻次分布特征的影響因子缺陷矯正——位置指標應(yīng)用于期刊評價的實證研究[J];圖書情報工作;2016年09期
5 蔣南平;;中國經(jīng)濟學期刊國際化的幾個問題[J];浙江工商大學學報;2016年03期
6 唐鑫;;論國內(nèi)學術(shù)期刊的國際化[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2016年09期
7 蔣愷;宋扉;馮景;;我國信息科學期刊國際化發(fā)展的比較分析[J];中國科技期刊研究;2016年04期
8 楊琦;張娜;趙文義;;全球化背景下西方科技期刊國際化的借鑒與思考[J];科技與出版;2016年03期
9 劉雪立;周晶;蓋雙雙;;我國SCI來源期刊作者國際化水平及其與學術(shù)影響力的關(guān)系[J];中國科技期刊研究;2015年10期
10 蓋雙雙;劉雪立;;我國圖書館學情報學研究的國際化現(xiàn)狀——基于SSCI高影響力圖書館學情報學期刊引證分析[J];科技情報開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟;2015年11期
，本文編號：2301577
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/tushudanganlunwen/2301577.html
最近更新
教材專著
