本文選題：中文學術圖書 + 學術影響力�。� 參考：《西南民族大學學報(人文社科版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：評價學術圖書影響力,能對學術圖書作者、作者機構、編輯、出版社等進行激勵與鞭策,能有效揭示圖書學術價值,擴大推廣利用,促進世界范圍內交流,能從專著的角度對學科建設及科研項目等進行評估。評價學術圖書影響力有同行專家評價、引文評價及Altmetrics評價等三種方法。鑒于同行專家評價、引文評價存在的問題,Altmetrics正在成為一種更易實施的學術圖書影響力分析評價新方法。論文介紹并分析了國內外學術圖書Altmetrics影響力分析評價的理論研究現(xiàn)狀,介紹了國外5種典型的學術圖書Altmetrics影響力分析評價工具——Altmetric.com、Bookmetrix、Plum Analytics、World Cat Search API、Scopus Article Metrics。論文提出,為推動國內中文學術圖書Altmetrics學術影響力分析評價,應對中文學術圖書Altmetrics相關理論、數(shù)據(jù)來源及采集方法、數(shù)據(jù)指標及體系、工具、學科實證分析等內容進行系統(tǒng)研究。論文發(fā)現(xiàn),隨著國內外圖書Altmetrics理論、工具的不斷完善,Altmetrics可為國內中文學術圖書影響力分析評價提供新的視野。
[Abstract]:Evaluating the influence of academic books can stimulate and motivate the authors, editors, publishing houses, etc., can effectively reveal the academic value of books, expand their popularization and use, and promote worldwide exchanges. Be able to evaluate subject construction and scientific research projects from the perspective of monographs. There are three methods to evaluate the influence of academic books: peer expert evaluation, citation evaluation and Altmetrics evaluation. In view of the peer expert evaluation, the problems in citation evaluation are becoming a new method to analyze and evaluate the influence of academic books. This paper introduces and analyzes the theoretical research status of Altmetrics influence analysis and evaluation of academic books at home and abroad, and introduces five typical tools for Altmetrics influence analysis and evaluation of academic books abroad: Altmetric. comm Bookmetrix- Plum AnalyticsScopus Article Metrics.Scopus Article Metrics. The paper puts forward that in order to promote the analysis and evaluation of the academic influence of Chinese academic book Altmetrics, we should deal with the related theory, data source and collection method, data index and system, tools of Chinese academic book Altmetrics. Subject empirical analysis and other contents of a systematic study. It is found that with the Altmetrics theory of books at home and abroad, the continuous improvement of the tools can provide a new perspective for the analysis and evaluation of the influence of Chinese academic books in China.
，

本文編號：2018630