本文選題：高校圖書館 + 學科服務�。� 參考：《安徽大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：學科服務是以學科館員為主體,以圖書館的文獻信息資源和網(wǎng)絡數(shù)據(jù)資源為依托,以學科服務平臺為橋梁,以用戶需求為中心,從學科的角度,向教學和科研領域的師生用戶提供專業(yè)化、個性化的知識服務。學科服務與傳統(tǒng)的圖書館信息咨詢服務不同,它不僅僅是用戶的信息提供者,還參與用戶的教學和科研工作,嵌入到培養(yǎng)計劃、課程制定、學術跟蹤、課題分析、文獻檢索、成果申報等服務工作中,協(xié)助師生更好地進行教學科研工作。當今時代,高校圖書館最主要的工作就是開展好學科服務工作,為高校的師生用戶提供需要的信息保障,由此為學校的教學和科研工作保駕護航,從而提高高校圖書館的服務質量和服務水平,確保圖書館在信息傳播中不可替代的地位,提高用戶對圖書館的認知度和肯定度。隨著信息社會的到來,學科服務建設逐漸成為高校圖書館發(fā)展的標準,因此這項工作目前正在各大高校如火如荼的進行著�？墒且驗槟壳昂芏啻髮W對圖書館所開展的學科服務工作的認識定位和資源投入的不同,導致許多大學的學科服務建設工作還處在試探過程中,所呈現(xiàn)出的服務水平及質量效果均出現(xiàn)很大差距,由此造成全國高校圖書館的學科服務工作整體現(xiàn)狀不一致。針對國內高校圖書館的學科服務建設工作方面出現(xiàn)的種種問題,非常有必要構建一套綜合的學科服務評價體系,對其進行科學的評價,從而有針對性的改進不足,促進高校圖書館學科服務工作的持續(xù)長效發(fā)展。本文通過文獻調查與網(wǎng)絡調查的方式,了解關于高校圖書館學科服務工作的研究發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,然后向專家發(fā)放問卷征求意見,并且結合了有關的數(shù)據(jù)結果與學術成果,構建了一套關于高校圖書館學科服務工作的評價指標體系;然后通過層次分析法分別獲得指標體系中各指標的對應權重,從而得出基于層次分析法的高校圖書館學科服務的評價模型;最后,通過構建出的評價模型分別對上海交通大學、中國科學技術大學和華中師范大學的圖書館學科服務工作進行評價研究,采用調查問卷的形式搜集用戶的評分,并比較分析三所高校的數(shù)據(jù)結果,指出不足,有針對性的提出改進建議,促進高校圖書館學科服務工作更好開展。本文主要從七個部分展開對高校圖書館學科服務的評價研究:第一部分是引言,主要介紹了論文的研究背景與研究意義,研究內容與方法,以及研究創(chuàng)新點。第二部分,主要介紹論文的相關概念,包括學科服務的概念和層次分析法的原理,其次闡述了國內外關于學科服務以及學科服務評價的研究現(xiàn)狀。第三部分,主要是關于高校圖書館學科服務評價指標的構建,結合文獻調查與專家調查,綜合相關研究成果,構建出合理的高校圖書館學科服務評價指標體系,包括4個一級指標,20個二級指標。第四部分,主要是確定各項評價指標的權重,首先利用層次分析法構造判斷矩陣,計算特征向量、最大特征值,并進行一致性檢驗,確定各指標的權重向量,最后得出整個指標體系的合成權重。第五部分,主要是案例評價,利用層次分析法,根據(jù)構建的高校圖書館學科服務評價指標體系,分別對上海交通大學、中國科學技術大學和華中師范大學圖書館的學科服務工作進行評價,并對結果進行分析比較。第六部分,主要是針對上文出現(xiàn)的問題,提出相關的高校圖書館學科服務建設改進建議。第七部分是結語,主要是對全文進行總結,分析基于層次分析法對高校圖書館學科服務進行評價的成果和不足,并提出對本研究的展望。本文的創(chuàng)新點,一是提出了較為綜合的評價指標體系,分別從學科館員建設、學科平臺建設、學科資源建設、學科制度建設這四個方面來構建高校圖書館學科服務的評價指標,從整體的角度,能更系統(tǒng)更全面的評價高校圖書館學科服務實施的情況;二是采用定性定量相結合的研究方法,結合文獻調查、專家調查法與層次分析法,能更科學更準確地評價高校圖書館學科服務的質量和效果。隨著信息環(huán)境的快速發(fā)展,高校圖書館學科服務工作將面臨不斷的挑戰(zhàn)與機遇,我們應該以此為契機,不斷完善學科制度建設,加快學科館員、學科平臺以及學科資源建設,努力做好圖書館的學科服務工作,為高校的教學和科研工作提供強有力的信息保障。
[Abstract]:Subject service is the subject of subject librarian, relying on the library's literature and information resources and network data resources, taking the service platform of the subject as the bridge, taking the user's demand as the center, providing professional and personalized knowledge service to the teachers and students in the field of teaching and scientific research from the point of view of the subject. Consulting service is different. It is not only the information provider of the users, but also the teaching and scientific research work of the users. It is embedded in the training plan, the course making, the academic tracking, the analysis of the subject, the literature retrieval and the application of the results. The main work of the university library is to help the teachers and students to do the teaching and scientific research work. It is to carry out a good subject service work, provide the information guarantee for the teachers and students of the University, thus protect the teaching and scientific research work of the school, thus improve the service quality and service level of the university library, ensure the irreplaceable position of the library in the information dissemination, and improve the user's recognition and affirmation of the library. With the arrival of the information society, the construction of the subject service has gradually become the standard of the development of the university library. Therefore, this work is being carried out in full swing in various universities. However, many universities have led to the academic service of many universities because of the differences in the knowledge and location of the subject service and the input of the resources. The work construction work is still in the trial process, and the service level and the quality effect present a big gap. Thus, the whole state of the subject service work of the National University Library is not consistent. It is very necessary to build a comprehensive set of problems in the field of the construction of the subject service of the domestic university libraries. The evaluation system of subject service has a scientific evaluation, so that there is a lack of pertinent improvement and promote the continuous and long-term development of the subject service of the university library. Through the literature survey and the network investigation, this paper understands the research and development status of the subject service work of the university library, and then issue the questionnaire to the experts. According to the relevant data results and academic achievements, a set of evaluation index system about the subject service of university library is constructed, and then the corresponding weight of each index in the index system is obtained by the analytic hierarchy process, and the evaluation model of the academic service of University Library Based on the analytic hierarchy process is obtained. By constructing the evaluation model, the library subject service of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, University of Science & Technology China and Huazhong Normal University is evaluated and studied. The questionnaire is used to collect users' scores, and the data results of the three universities are compared and analyzed. The subject service work of the university library is better carried out. This paper mainly studies the evaluation of the subject service of the University Library from seven parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly introduces the research background and research significance, the research content and method, and the research innovation point. The second part mainly introduces the related concepts of the paper, including the study of the paper. The concept of science service and the principle of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), secondly the present situation of the research on subject service and the evaluation of subject service at home and abroad. The third part is mainly about the construction of the evaluation index of the subject service of the university library, combining with the literature survey and expert investigation, and combining the relevant research results to build a reasonable university library. The evaluation index system of the subject service includes 4 first level indexes and 20 two level indexes. The fourth part is mainly to determine the weight of each evaluation index. First, we use the analytic hierarchy process to construct the judgment matrix, calculate the characteristic vector and the maximum characteristic value, and make the consistency check, determine the weight vector of each index, and finally get the whole index system. Synthetic weight. The fifth part, mainly the case evaluation, using the analytic hierarchy process, according to the construction of the evaluation index system of university library subject service, appraise the subject service work of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, University of Science & Technology China and Huazhong Normal University library respectively, and compare the results with the results. The sixth part, mainly In view of the problems presented above, the paper puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of the discipline service construction of university libraries. The seventh part is the conclusion. It mainly summarizes the full text, analyzes the achievements and shortcomings of the evaluation of the subject service of the University Library Based on the analytic hierarchy process, and puts forward the prospect of this research. The comprehensive evaluation index system, respectively from the discipline librarian construction, the discipline platform construction, the discipline resources construction, the discipline system construction in four aspects to construct the university library subject service evaluation index, from the overall point of view, can more systematically and comprehensively evaluate the implementation of the University Library Subject Service; the two is to adopt the qualitative determination. Combined with the research method of quantity, combined with literature survey, expert investigation and analytic hierarchy process, the quality and effect of university library subject service can be evaluated more scientifically and more accurately. With the rapid development of information environment, the subject service work of university library will face constant challenge and opportunity. We should take this opportunity and improve it continuously. The construction of discipline system, speed up the construction of subject librarians, subject platform and subject resources, make great efforts to serve the subject service of the library, and provide a strong information guarantee for the teaching and scientific research work of the University.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G258.6;G252

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 廖球;高飛;;嵌入式學科服務評價體系研究[J];情報探索;2016年06期

2 于靜;趙敏;;美國高校圖書館學科服務實踐與案例分析[J];圖書館建設;2015年01期

3 楚存坤;孫思琴;韓豐談;;基于層次分析法的高校圖書館學科服務評價模式[J];大學圖書館學報;2014年06期

4 王海英;;高校圖書館學科服務研究評價[J];圖書館學研究;2014年18期

5 趙闖;;基于用戶感知價值的高校圖書館學科服務評價研究[J];圖書館學研究;2014年18期

6 付佳佳;黃敏;;圖書館IC~2創(chuàng)新支持服務的有效拓展——上海交通大學“創(chuàng)新交流社區(qū)”的建設實踐[J];圖書館雜志;2013年09期

7 王雪芳;;高校圖書館學科服務制度體系研究[J];圖書情報工作;2013年09期

8 陸莉;;“211工程”高校圖書館學科服務現(xiàn)狀調查與分析[J];圖書館學研究;2013年04期

9 袁曄;郭晶;余曉蔚;;Libguides學科服務平臺的應用實踐和優(yōu)化策略[J];圖書情報工作;2013年02期

10 高曉英;;我國高校圖書館學科服務研究綜述[J];圖書館學研究;2012年22期

，

本文編號：1945390