本文選題：四庫(kù)全書(shū)總目　切入點(diǎn)：朱子之學(xué)　出處：《圖書(shū)館工作與研究》2017年08期

【摘要】：學(xué)術(shù)界一般認(rèn)為《四庫(kù)全書(shū)總目》對(duì)朱熹的評(píng)價(jià)是以批判為主。通過(guò)梳理與分析《四庫(kù)全書(shū)總目》對(duì)朱熹論著及學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)的評(píng)價(jià)可以發(fā)現(xiàn),《四庫(kù)全書(shū)總目》主要是對(duì)朱子《周易本義》采用圖書(shū)之說(shuō)及卦變之說(shuō)、《詩(shī)集傳》舍序言《詩(shī)》等持完全否定態(tài)度,而對(duì)朱熹在《尚書(shū)》學(xué)、《春秋》學(xué)、三禮學(xué)、《四書(shū)》學(xué)等方面的論述從學(xué)術(shù)上講則基本贊同�！端膸�(kù)全書(shū)總目》對(duì)朱子之學(xué)的評(píng)價(jià),從思想上講,是以清高宗御纂欽定經(jīng)學(xué)著作為標(biāo)準(zhǔn);從學(xué)術(shù)上講,是以清代漢學(xué)家的著作為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。朱子之學(xué)在乾隆時(shí)期逐漸失去其道統(tǒng)地位和學(xué)術(shù)范式地位,在《總目》中確有體現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The academic circles generally think that the evaluation of Zhu Xi is mainly critical. By combing and analyzing the works and academic viewpoints of Zhu Xi, it can be found that the main contents of "Siku Guanshu" are the main ones. It is a complete negation of Zhu Zi's introduction to the Book of changes and the theory of divinatory change, the preface of the Book of Poems, the poem, etc. On the other hand, Zhu Xi's argumentation in the aspects of "Shang Shu", "Spring and Autumn", "three Rites", "four Books" and so on is basically agreed from the academic point of view. From the academic point of view, it is based on the works of the Sinologists in the Qing Dynasty. Zhu Zi's studies gradually lost their status as the Taoist system and the academic paradigm during the Qianlong period, and they are indeed embodied in the General catalogue.
【作者單位】： 山東師范大學(xué)齊魯文化研究院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重點(diǎn)研究基地齊魯文化研究中心“十三五”規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“齊魯文化與中華文明轉(zhuǎn)化創(chuàng)新” 國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“四庫(kù)提要匯輯匯校匯考”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):15ZDB075)研究成果之一
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G257

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 ;疑與讀書(shū)[J];教學(xué)與研究;1962年03期

2 黃亦君;;寓雅于俗 翻舊拓新——讀《朱子彥論三國(guó)謀略》[J];文化學(xué)刊;2009年01期

3 尹波;張尚英;;《朱子世家》版本考略[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

4 尹光華;安建平;;《朱子年譜》上的焦循題記[J];圖書(shū)館理論與實(shí)踐;2010年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1668354