本文選題：張淮深　切入點(diǎn)：張球　出處：《敦煌研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文主要根據(jù)法藏敦煌文書P.2913V《張淮深墓志銘》及從非常著名的《張淮深碑》抄件(S.6161A+S.3329+S.141564+S.6161B+S.6973+P.2762)卷背詩(shī)文中新找到的相關(guān)記述,對(duì)這些文書及其折射的歸義軍史諸問題進(jìn)行了辨析考證。指出:《張淮深墓志銘》為葬后補(bǔ)寫,當(dāng)撰于索勛當(dāng)政期間,即景福二年至乾寧元年(893—894),略晚于同是張球所撰作的《索勛紀(jì)德碑》;通過對(duì)上述文書及當(dāng)時(shí)敦煌史事的分析可知,索勛掌權(quán)后曾有過遷改葬張淮深及其諸子以安撫張淮深舊屬等舉動(dòng),表明在張氏家族的內(nèi)訌爭(zhēng)斗中索勛的態(tài)度相對(duì)和緩,不像張淮鼎、張議潮十四女及李氏諸子那樣激烈;與張淮深同時(shí)遇害的主要就是其與陳氏夫人所生六子,并無陳氏本人,張淮深其余兒子則因非陳氏所生而沒有死于此難,推測(cè)張淮深當(dāng)與諸嫡子政見一致,而諸庶子在此次血腥政變中的地位與作用特殊;張球撰作上述文書時(shí)非常用心,遣詞用字均仔細(xì)斟酌考慮,透過其于字里行間的隱晦表述,我們既可以索解出部分研究線索,又可以感受到張球與張淮深感情之深厚與行文之老到。
[Abstract]:According to the method of Tibetan documents of Dunhuang P.2913V< Zhang Huai deep epitaph "and from the famous" Zhang Huai Bei deep (S.6161A+S.3329+S.141564+S.6161B+S.6973+P.2762) > copy of the records found in the poetry of new roll back, the problems of these instruments and the refraction of Guiyijun was analyzed. It is pointed out that the history of research: "Zhang Huai deep epitaph. After the funeral, as written, when written in the Suo Xun power, two years to the Jingfu qianning first year (893 - 894), the same is slightly later than a ball written by the" Suo Xun Kidd tablet "; through the analysis of the above documents and the historical events in Dunhuang that had power cable Hoon after Qiangai buried depth and philosophers to appease Zhang Huai Zhang Huai deep old is indicated in the move, the Zhang family infighting battle Suo Xun relatively gentle attitude, like Zhang Huaiding, Zhang Yichao Lee and fourteen female philosophers so fierce; and Zhang Huaishen killed the main is the Six children born Mrs. Chen, Chen is not my son, Zhang Huai deep rest due to non Chen born without die hard, that is consistent with the deep when Zhang Huai son and the status and role of the politics in the bloody coup in a special piece of writing; very hard ball of the document, words words are carefully considered, through its expression in the hidden between the lines, we can understand some clues, and can feel the old Zhang and Zhang Huai ball deep affection of the deep with this paper.

【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院歷史研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“晚唐敦煌文士張球與歸義軍史研究”(16BZS007)
【分類號(hào)】：G256.1;K242.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 孫修身;張淮深之死再議[J];西北師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1982年02期

2 鄧文寬;張淮深平定甘州忯鶻史事鉤沉[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年05期

3 f麟;;張淮深之死疑案的研究[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1993年02期

4 李永寧;豎牛作孽 君主見欺——談張淮深之死及唐末歸義軍執(zhí)權(quán)者之更迭[J];敦煌研究;1986年02期

5 鄧文寬;《涼州節(jié)院使押衙劉少晏狀》新探[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1987年02期

6 榮新江;沙州張淮深與唐中央朝廷之關(guān)系[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1990年02期

7 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1659655