本文選題：檔案學(xué)　切入點(diǎn)：圖書(shū)館學(xué)　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文選取中國(guó)知網(wǎng)優(yōu)秀碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)所載2007—2016年檔案學(xué)與圖書(shū)館學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文(2007年1月1日-2017年1月3日)作為研究樣本,對(duì)收集到的2374篇樣本論文研究方法的應(yīng)用狀況進(jìn)行調(diào)查,然后對(duì)比兩種學(xué)科樣本論文研究方法的應(yīng)用狀況,分析共性與差異,并在此基礎(chǔ)上探討圖書(shū)館學(xué)學(xué)科研究方法對(duì)檔案學(xué)學(xué)科的啟示,進(jìn)而預(yù)測(cè)檔案學(xué)研究方法未來(lái)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。檔案學(xué)與圖書(shū)館學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文在研究方法實(shí)際應(yīng)用方面存在以下幾點(diǎn)共性:文獻(xiàn)研究法的應(yīng)用最為頻繁;邏輯思維法的應(yīng)用呈下降趨勢(shì);比較研究法和案例分析法是經(jīng)常應(yīng)用的研究方法;定量研究方法應(yīng)用比重不斷增加。同時(shí),兩種學(xué)科碩士學(xué)位論文研究方法的應(yīng)用也存在著一些差異,具體表現(xiàn)為:圖書(shū)館學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中定量研究方法的應(yīng)用程度和水平、應(yīng)用研究方法的規(guī)范程度、以及研究方法的協(xié)同應(yīng)用能力都要高于檔案學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文。兩種學(xué)科碩士學(xué)位論文研究方法的應(yīng)用主要有以下幾點(diǎn)特征:傳統(tǒng)定性研究方法仍然在研究中占主導(dǎo)地位,但定量研究方法的應(yīng)用也呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì);各種研究方法的應(yīng)用之間呈現(xiàn)明顯的結(jié)構(gòu)化差異;不斷引入新型研究方法,研究方法種類多樣化;研究方法的應(yīng)用比較穩(wěn)定,研究方法協(xié)同應(yīng)用能力有所提高。值得注意的是,檔案學(xué)與圖書(shū)館學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文研究方法的應(yīng)用還存在著兩點(diǎn)明顯的不足,即兩種學(xué)科碩士研究生研究方法素養(yǎng)不高,以及過(guò)于依賴定性研究方法,研究方法結(jié)構(gòu)亟需優(yōu)化。筆者認(rèn)為,圖書(shū)館學(xué)學(xué)科研究方法對(duì)檔案學(xué)學(xué)科有如下幾點(diǎn)啟示:加強(qiáng)檔案學(xué)學(xué)者研究方法的教育與訓(xùn)練;提高檔案學(xué)學(xué)者的研究方法意識(shí),進(jìn)一步規(guī)范研究方法的應(yīng)用;優(yōu)化檔案學(xué)研究方法結(jié)構(gòu),提高定量研究方法的應(yīng)用程度和應(yīng)用水平;反思檔案學(xué)研究方法的不足,構(gòu)建并完善本學(xué)科研究方法論體系。未來(lái)檔案學(xué)學(xué)科研究方法的發(fā)展會(huì)體現(xiàn)出以下幾點(diǎn)趨勢(shì):多種研究方法協(xié)同應(yīng)用;定量研究與定性研究有機(jī)結(jié)合;檔案學(xué)學(xué)者將更加關(guān)注研究方法的實(shí)際應(yīng)用效果。
[Abstract]:This paper selects the master's thesis of archival science and library science (January 1st 2007-January 3rd 2017) as the research sample from 2007 to 2016 in the full text database of excellent Master's degree thesis of China Zhiwang. This paper investigates the application of the research methods of 2374 sample papers collected, and then compares the application status of the two kinds of research methods of sample papers, and analyzes the commonalities and differences. On the basis of this, the enlightenment of library science research method to archives science is discussed. Then it predicts the future development trend of archival research methods. There are some commonalities in the practical application of research methods between archives science and library science master's degree papers: the most frequent application of literature research methods; The application of logical thinking method shows a downward trend; comparative research method and case analysis method are frequently applied research methods; quantitative research method application proportion is increasing. At the same time, There are also some differences in the application of the research methods in the two subjects, which are: the degree and level of the application of the quantitative research method in the master's thesis of library science, and the standard degree of the applied research method. And the ability of collaborative application of the research methods is higher than that of the master's degree thesis in archives. The application of the two research methods has the following characteristics: the traditional qualitative research method still dominates the research. However, the application of quantitative research methods also shows an increasing trend; there are obvious structural differences among the applications of various research methods; new research methods are continuously introduced, and the variety of research methods is diversified; the application of research methods is relatively stable. The ability of collaborative application of research methods has been improved. It is worth noting that there are still two obvious deficiencies in the application of research methods in archives science and library science, that is, the literacy of research methods for graduate students of two disciplines is not high. As well as relying too much on qualitative research methods, the research method structure needs to be optimized. The author thinks that library science subject research method has the following enlightenment to archives science discipline: strengthening the education and training of archival science scholars' research method; To improve the awareness of research methods of archivists, to further standardize the application of research methods, to optimize the structure of archives research methods, to improve the degree and level of application of quantitative research methods, to reflect on the shortcomings of archival research methods, In the future, the development of archival research methods will reflect the following trends: collaborative application of various research methods, organic combination of quantitative research and qualitative research; Archives scholars will pay more attention to the practical application of research methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G270;G250

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鮑玉靜;金勝勇;;德?tīng)柗品ㄔ趫D書(shū)館學(xué)研究中的應(yīng)用[J];河北科技圖苑;2016年05期

2 陳忠海;董一超;;檔案學(xué)研究方法應(yīng)用的狀況、問(wèn)題及建議——基于2010-2014年《檔案學(xué)通訊》《檔案學(xué)研究》所載文獻(xiàn)的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2015年06期

3 劉竟;田麗麗;蘇文成;;歐美圖書(shū)館學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文研究方法分析[J];圖書(shū)館學(xué)研究;2015年18期

4 金梅;張麗君;劉君;;圖書(shū)館學(xué)調(diào)查研究方法運(yùn)用的微觀考察——3種Top期刊調(diào)查研究報(bào)告解析[J];圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作;2015年08期

5 李弘_g;;科學(xué)研究方法在檔案學(xué)領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用評(píng)述——以2010—2012年《檔案學(xué)研究》為研究對(duì)象[J];檔案與建設(shè);2014年08期

6 牟凱旋;;檔案學(xué)研究方法統(tǒng)計(jì)分析——以2009年《檔案學(xué)通訊》論文為例[J];辦公室業(yè)務(wù);2014年13期

7 王新才;文振興;;檔案學(xué)研究中計(jì)量法運(yùn)用的計(jì)量分析[J];檔案管理;2014年03期

8 劉洪;章康馨;;2002-2012年檔案學(xué)研究中應(yīng)用社會(huì)調(diào)查法的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2013年05期

9 郎筠;韓亮;;圖書(shū)館學(xué)研究中定性與定量研究的再思考[J];農(nóng)業(yè)圖書(shū)情報(bào)學(xué)刊;2013年02期

10 時(shí)婉璐;;2006-2011年比較方法在我國(guó)檔案學(xué)研究中的應(yīng)用統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];北京檔案;2012年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王道紅;學(xué)位論文質(zhì)量管理研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1601049