本文選題：氧化物納米材料　切入點：土壤微生物群落　出處：《東北師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于氧化物納米材料具有獨特的化學和物理性質,從而被廣泛應用。隨著其應用越來越廣泛,氧化物納米材料將不可避免地被釋放到土壤環(huán)境中。由于土壤微生物群落在地球上的許多生物地球化學過程中發(fā)揮重要作用,因此研究氧化物納米顆粒暴露對土壤微生物群落的影響是至關重要的。為了表征其影響,我們以3種典型的氧化物納米材料(CuO,SiO_2和Al_2O_3納米材料)作為研究對象,模擬氧化物納米材料進入土壤中的環(huán)境條件,探究了3種納米材料在不同濃度(0.5,1.0和2.0 mg·g-1))、不同處理時間(15 d和30 d)下對兩種土壤(黑土和鹽堿土)的土壤酶活的影響,并且采用實時熒光定量PCR技術(qPCR)和高通量測序技術,探究了高濃度的氧化銅納米材料在不同處理時間下對兩種土壤細菌群落結構的影響,以期揭示氧化物納米材料在不同尺度下與土壤微生物群落的相互關系,科學評估氧化物納米材料的土壤環(huán)境生態(tài)及健康風險,從而為納米材料泄露對土壤生態(tài)風險管理提供理論依據(jù),進而推動納米科技健康可持續(xù)發(fā)展。主要研究結果如下:(1)土壤酶活性對不同的納米材料的敏感性不同。CuO納米材料的毒性最大,緊隨其后的是SiO_2納米材料,Al_2O_3納米材料對土壤酶活性的抑制作用最小。(2)納米材料對土壤酶活性的影響呈現(xiàn)劑量依賴效應,隨濃度的增加呈現(xiàn)增強效應。(3)Al_2O_3納米材料對黑土脲酶抑制效應是短暫的,說明在培養(yǎng)過程中,土壤微生物群落可能產(chǎn)生了適應納米材料處理的耐受機制。(4)SiO_2納米材料對黑土磷酸酶的促進作用以及對黑土過氧化氫酶的抑制作用僅在納米材料長時間(培養(yǎng)第30 d)暴露下出現(xiàn),說明納米材料對酶活的影響可能存在潛伏期。(5)與黑土相比,鹽堿土的土壤酶活性更易受納米材料的影響。(6)CuO納米材料降低了鹽堿土土壤細菌群落大小和多樣性,但對黑土土壤細菌群落大小和多樣性無顯著影響。(7)CuO納米材料改變了兩種土壤類型中的土壤微生物群落組成,但物種組成有不同的變化。在鹽堿土中,氧化銅納米材料對土壤細菌群落的影響以抑制方式占主導,而在黑土中,氧化銅納米材料對絕大多數(shù)細菌群落表現(xiàn)出了耐受效應和促進效應。
[Abstract]:Oxide nanomaterials are widely used because of their unique chemical and physical properties. Oxide nanomaterials will inevitably be released into the soil environment because soil microbial communities play an important role in many biogeochemical processes on Earth. Therefore, it is important to study the effects of oxide nanoparticles exposure on soil microbial communities. In order to characterize the effects, we studied three typical oxide nanomaterials, CuOSiO2 and Al_2O_3 nanomaterials. In order to simulate the environmental conditions of oxide nanomaterials entering into soil, the effects of three kinds of nanomaterials on the soil enzyme activity of two soils (black soil and saline-alkali soil) were studied under different concentrations of 0.5g ~ (-1) and 2.0 mg / g ~ (-1) and different treatment time (15 d and 30 d). The effects of high concentration copper oxide nanomaterials on the community structure of two kinds of soil bacteria were studied by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and high-throughput sequencing. In order to reveal the relationship between oxide nanomaterials and soil microbial communities at different scales, and to assess scientifically the soil ecological and health risks of oxide nanomaterials, Therefore, it can provide theoretical basis for soil ecological risk management by nanometer material leakage. The main results are as follows: 1) soil enzyme activity has different sensitivity to different nanomaterials. CuO nanomaterials have the greatest toxicity. The SiO_2 nanomaterials, Al2O3 nanomaterials, had the least inhibitory effect on soil enzyme activity. (2) the effects of SiO_2 nanomaterials on soil enzyme activity showed a dose-dependent effect. The enhancement effect was observed with the increase of concentration. The inhibitory effect of Al2O3 nano-material on urease in black soil was transient, which indicated that in the process of culture, The soil microbial community may have a tolerant mechanism adapted to the treatment of nanomaterials. The promoting effect of nano-materials on phosphatase in black soil and the inhibition of catalase in black soil appeared only after exposure to nano-materials for a long time (30 days of culture). The results showed that the effect of nanomaterials on enzyme activity might exist in incubation period. (5) compared with black soil, soil enzyme activity of saline-alkali soil was more susceptible to the influence of nanomaterials. CuO nanomaterials reduced the size and diversity of soil bacterial communities in saline-alkali soils. However, there was no significant effect on the size and diversity of bacterial community in black soil. CuO nanomaterials changed the composition of soil microbial communities in two soil types, but the species composition was different. The effect of copper oxide nanomaterials on soil bacterial communities was dominated by inhibition, while in black soil, copper oxide nanomaterials showed tolerance and promotion effects on most bacterial communities.
【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TB383.1;S154.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 郭彥;楊洪雙;張翠;張文會;;大豆根瘤突變體連作土壤中纖維素酶和蔗糖酶活性的變化[J];江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2014年07期

2 劉元方;陳欣欣;王海芳;;納米材料生物效應研究和安全性評價前沿[J];自然雜志;2011年04期

3 秦楠;栗東芳;楊瑞馥;;高通量測序技術及其在微生物學研究中的應用[J];微生物學報;2011年04期

4 于聘飛;王英;葛芹玉;;高通量DNA測序技術及其應用進展[J];南京曉莊學院學報;2010年03期

5 顏慧;鐘文輝;李忠佩;蔡祖聰;;長期施肥對紅壤水稻土磷脂脂肪酸特性和酶活性的影響[J];應用生態(tài)學報;2008年01期

6 KHAN Sardar;HESHAM Abd El-Latif;;Soil enzymatic activities and microbial community structure with different application rates of Cd and Pb[J];Journal of Environmental Sciences;2007年07期

7 夏月;Sardar Khan;賀紀正;朱永官;;限制性片段長度多態(tài)性分析(ARDRA)方法對重金屬污染土壤中細菌群落多樣性的研究[J];環(huán)境科學學報;2007年06期

8 曾憲軍;劉登魁;朱世民;;不同濃度阿特拉津對三種肥力條件土壤過氧化氫酶的影響[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2005年06期

9 趙勇,周志華,李武,劉彬彬,潘迎捷,趙立平;土壤微生物分子生態(tài)學研究中總DNA的提取[J];農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境科學學報;2005年05期

10 張晶,張惠文,張成剛;實時熒光定量PCR及其在微生物生態(tài)學中的應用[J];生態(tài)學報;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1675270