本文選題：海島森林　切入點：城市森林　出處：《福建農(nóng)林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：海島森林的建設(shè)成果與人們的生活質(zhì)量息息相關(guān),隨著生活水平的不斷提高,人們對于海島森林的建設(shè)也越來越看重。但是如何對海島森林的建設(shè)成果進行合理的評價,還沒有一個很明確的標準體系,我國在有關(guān)方面的研究也處于剛起步階段。本文以平潭綜合實驗區(qū)海島森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)為研究對象,選取了城市森林綠化、城市森林結(jié)構(gòu)和森林生態(tài)服務(wù)功能3個層次的12個指標建立平潭綜合實驗區(qū)海島森林效益評價體系,采用層次分析法、專家打分法、實地調(diào)查和內(nèi)頁數(shù)據(jù)分析等方法對平潭綜合實驗區(qū)的海島森林效益進行評價,得到以下研究成果:(1)通過建立森林綜合評價體系對平潭綜合實驗區(qū)內(nèi)海島森林進行評價,最終得到的評價指數(shù)為0.6781,處于Ⅱ級水平,屬于城市森林結(jié)構(gòu)、布局較為合理,功能價值中等,建設(shè)程度中等的水平,相較于"十二五"規(guī)劃之前,已經(jīng)有了很大的進步,說明平潭綜合實驗區(qū)近幾年在園林綠化方面做的努力小有成效。(2)通過德爾菲—層次分析法對平潭綜合實驗區(qū)各指標層進行權(quán)重分析,結(jié)果表明森林功能對于實驗區(qū)的重要性最大,達到了 55%,這是由于平潭綜合實驗區(qū)地理位置四面環(huán)海,長年收到海風(fēng)侵襲,氣候環(huán)境較為惡劣,而海島森林的生態(tài)服務(wù)功能能夠通過調(diào)節(jié)氣候、固碳釋氧、涵養(yǎng)水源、防風(fēng)固沙等方式為島內(nèi)居民提供較好的居住條件。(3)在對平潭綜合實驗區(qū)海島森林進行評價時,二級指標層中城市綠化的得分最高,森林結(jié)構(gòu)得分最低,說明平潭綜合實驗區(qū)森林的結(jié)構(gòu)還不是很合理,近幾年在園林綠化方面有量但是質(zhì)較差,還需進一步改進。(4)在平潭綜合實驗區(qū)海島森林綜合評價體系的12個指標評價得分中,城市森林覆蓋率和綠地率的得分超過了 1,高于國家園林城市評選標準,人均公共綠地也快接近評選標準,但是綠量的評價得分僅有0.29,遠低于1,這是由于平潭綜合實驗區(qū)近幾年對島內(nèi)進行了大量的補植,而樹木還沒長到成熟的年齡,導(dǎo)致城市綠量不夠,具體的綠化效果還需要時間去檢驗。(5)在對森林生態(tài)服務(wù)功能進行評價時,同時計算了林木的立木價格。通過對比發(fā)現(xiàn),森林的各個單項生態(tài)服務(wù)功能帶來的收益都遠大于其立木價格,最多的甚至達到20多倍,說明森林的生態(tài)服務(wù)價值遠遠大于其林木生產(chǎn)價值,也為森林保護提供了很好的依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The achievements of island forest construction are closely related to people's quality of life. With the improvement of living standard, people attach more and more importance to the construction of island forest. There is not a very clear standard system, and the research on relevant aspects in our country is just in its infancy. This paper takes the island forest ecosystem of Pingtan comprehensive experimental area as the research object, and selects urban forest greening. 12 indexes of three levels of urban forest structure and forest ecological service function are used to establish the evaluation system of island forest benefit in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area. The method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert scoring method are used. Field investigation and inner page data analysis are used to evaluate the benefit of the island forest in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area. The following research results are obtained: 1) the island forest in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area is evaluated by establishing a comprehensive forest evaluation system. The final evaluation index is 0.6781, which belongs to the urban forest structure and belongs to the second level. The distribution is relatively reasonable, the function value is moderate, and the level of construction is moderate. Compared with the 12th Five-Year Plan, great progress has been made. It shows that in recent years, Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental area has made little effort in garden greening. 2) the weight of each index layer in Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental area is analyzed by Delphi Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results show that the forest function is the most important to the experimental area, reaching 55. This is because the Pingtan comprehensive experimental area is surrounded by sea on all sides, and has been attacked by sea wind for many years, and the climate environment is relatively bad. The ecological service function of the island forest can provide better living conditions for the island residents by regulating climate, carbon sequestration, oxygen release, water conservation, wind and sand fixation, etc.) when evaluating the island forest in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area, Among the secondary index layers, urban greening has the highest score, and the forest structure has the lowest score, which indicates that the forest structure in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area is not very reasonable. In recent years, there has been a great deal of garden greening, but the quality is poor. In the 12 index evaluation scores of the comprehensive evaluation system of island forest in Pingtan comprehensive experimental area, the score of urban forest coverage and green space rate exceeded 1, which was higher than the national garden city evaluation standard. Public green space per capita is also close to the selection criteria, but the evaluation score of green quantity is only 0.29, which is far below 1. This is due to the large amount of replanting in Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental area in recent years, and the trees have not yet grown to mature age. As a result, the green quantity of the city is not enough, and the concrete greening effect still needs time to test. (5) when evaluating the ecological service function of the forest, the price of standing trees is calculated at the same time. Through comparison, it is found that, The benefit of individual ecological service function of forest is far greater than its stand price, the most of which is more than 20 times, which indicates that the value of forest ecological service is far greater than its forest production value, and it also provides a good basis for forest protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建農(nóng)林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：S718.56

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭佳蕾;黃義雄;;基于AHP和模糊綜合評判法的平潭縣生態(tài)系統(tǒng)脆弱性評價[J];防護林科技;2016年09期

2 韋菊玲;陳世清;;基于Delphi法的城市森林可持續(xù)經(jīng)營評價指標體系構(gòu)建研究[J];林業(yè)調(diào)查規(guī)劃;2016年01期

3 翁怡;;平潭綜合實驗區(qū)生態(tài)法律制度建設(shè)研究[J];福建省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年06期

4 葉志勇;;平潭觀賞植物資源及其園林應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代園藝;2015年15期

5 文華英;黃義雄;葉功富;張巧;;福建海壇島主要防護林生態(tài)服務(wù)功能價值評估[J];福建林業(yè)科技;2015年02期

6 葉志勇;;平潭綜合實驗區(qū)公路綠地植物群落多樣性與綠量影響因子研究[J];中國園藝文摘;2015年05期

7 文華英;黃義雄;張巧;鐘春柳;;海壇島沿海防護林森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)間接經(jīng)濟價值評估[J];防護林科技;2014年11期

8 溫小樂;林征峰;唐菲;;新興海島型城市建設(shè)引發(fā)的生態(tài)變化的遙感分析——以福建平潭綜合實驗區(qū)為例[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報;2015年02期

9 陳雪珍;;平潭綜合實驗區(qū)生態(tài)防護林體系建設(shè)研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2014年05期

10 林明;吳亨貴;;平潭水土流失及其防治對策探討[J];亞熱帶水土保持;2013年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 ;福建省國民經(jīng)濟和社會發(fā)展第十二個五年規(guī)劃綱要[N];福建日報;2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃義雄;福建濱海木麻黃防護林生態(tài)功能研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2013年

2 俞建群;論中國特色區(qū)域經(jīng)濟新發(fā)展[D];福建師范大學(xué);2012年

3 韓軼;城市森林建設(shè)理論及城市森林綜合評價的研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 謝雪莉;平潭綜合實驗區(qū)沿海防護林體系綜合效益空間分異研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2016年

2 文華英;海壇島防護林主要森林類型生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)功能評估[D];福建師范大學(xué);2015年

3 林曉杉;平潭綜合實驗區(qū)森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)構(gòu)建初探[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2014年

4 劉曉芬;平潭島生態(tài)功能網(wǎng)絡(luò)構(gòu)建研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2012年

5 岳新建;東南沿海木麻黃防護林優(yōu)化配置研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2010年

6 王珍;福建省沿海木麻黃防護林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)功能及其評價[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2010年

7 林紅葉;沿海木麻黃防護林可持續(xù)經(jīng)營配套技術(shù)研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2010年

8 羅棟q，

本文編號：1559636