本文選題：社會記憶 + 檔案工作��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：記憶是個體和群體過往經(jīng)歷和經(jīng)驗的見證和再現(xiàn),是個體和群體確立自身意識和身份認(rèn)同的基礎(chǔ)。檔案是社會生產(chǎn)生活過程中產(chǎn)生的、具有原始記錄性的文字記錄,是建構(gòu)社會記憶的重要資源,同時檔案工作通過一系列的管理和開發(fā)利用措施,對社會記憶建構(gòu)產(chǎn)生非常重要的影響。本文深入研究權(quán)力選擇和身份認(rèn)同在檔案建構(gòu)社會記憶過程中所扮演的角色,探究削減權(quán)力消極干預(yù)、確立身份認(rèn)同的途徑,建構(gòu)全面、真實、均衡的社會記憶。緒論部分對以往的檔案與記憶研究成果進行了系統(tǒng)梳理和內(nèi)容分析,總結(jié)現(xiàn)有研究成就和不足,為本文研究提供了借鑒和思路。正文部分首先從基礎(chǔ)入手,基于檔案的起源與發(fā)展,對檔案與社會記憶之間的關(guān)系進行了深入探究。檔案是社會記憶的記錄載體,社會記憶通過檔案及檔案工作得以建構(gòu)。但檔案及檔案工作建構(gòu)社會記憶也存在局限性。首先,檔案并不能涵蓋所有的記憶資源;其次,檔案及檔案工作在各方面受權(quán)力選擇的干預(yù);第三,傳統(tǒng)的檔案工作以組織機構(gòu)的官方敘述為中心,往往忽略非主流群體建構(gòu)自身群體記憶及身份認(rèn)同的需要。由此,檔案建構(gòu)社會記憶過程中非常重要但目前研究中鮮少涉及的兩個維度——權(quán)力選擇與身份認(rèn)同進入研究視野。本文第三章論述了權(quán)力對檔案及檔案工作進行干預(yù)的途徑、權(quán)力干預(yù)對檔案建構(gòu)社會記憶的影響、削弱權(quán)力干預(yù)消極影響的途徑。第四章論述了傳統(tǒng)的以組織機構(gòu)為中心的檔案工作建構(gòu)身份認(rèn)同的優(yōu)勢、途徑及不足,并由此引出非傳統(tǒng)檔案工作在建構(gòu)群體身份認(rèn)同和削減權(quán)力消極干預(yù)方面的重要作用,將權(quán)力干預(yù)與身份認(rèn)同聯(lián)系在一起。在提出削減權(quán)力消極干預(yù)和建構(gòu)身份認(rèn)同的途徑的基礎(chǔ)上,本文第五章提出了檔案建構(gòu)社會記憶所要達到的目標(biāo),分析了現(xiàn)階段檔案工作在建構(gòu)社會記憶過程中存在的問題,并探索出建構(gòu)全面、真實、均衡的社會記憶的途徑,由此希望對檔案工作建構(gòu)社會記憶的過程提供一些有效的指導(dǎo)和建議。
[Abstract]:Memory is the witness and representation of past experiences and experiences of individuals and groups, and it is the basis for individuals and groups to establish their own consciousness and identity. Archives, which are produced in the process of social production and life, are original written records and important resources for the construction of social memory. At the same time, archives work through a series of management, development and utilization measures. It has a very important influence on the construction of social memory. This paper deeply studies the role of power selection and identity in the process of archives construction social memory, explores the negative interference of reducing power, establishes the way of identity, and constructs comprehensive, real and balanced social memory. In the introduction part, the author systematically combs and analyzes the previous research results of archives and memory, summarizes the achievements and shortcomings of the existing research, and provides a reference and train of thought for the research of this paper. Based on the origin and development of archives, this paper explores the relationship between archives and social memory. Archives are the record carriers of social memory, which can be constructed through archives and archival work. However, archives and archival work also have limitations in the construction of social memory. First, archives do not cover all memory resources; second, archives and archival work are interfered in various aspects by choice of power; and third, traditional archival work centers on the official narrative of the organization. It often ignores the need for non-mainstream groups to construct their own group memory and identity. As a result, the two dimensions that are very important in the process of archival construction but seldom involved in the present research are the choice of power and identity. The third chapter discusses the ways of power intervention on archives and archival work, the influence of power intervention on archives construction social memory, and the way to weaken the negative influence of power intervention. The fourth chapter discusses the advantages, approaches and shortcomings of the traditional organization-centered archival work in the construction of identity, and leads to the important role of non-traditional archival work in the construction of group identity and the reduction of negative intervention of power. Power intervention is associated with identity. On the basis of the negative intervention of reducing power and the construction of identity, the fifth chapter of this paper puts forward the goal that archives should achieve in constructing social memory, and analyzes the problems existing in the process of constructing social memory in archival work at the present stage. The author also explores the ways to construct comprehensive, real and balanced social memory, hoping to provide some effective guidance and suggestions for the construction of social memory in archival work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G270

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱莉;;身份認(rèn)同對檔案信息資源建設(shè)的影響及其趨勢[J];浙江檔案;2017年02期

2 朱莉;;試論檔案與軟權(quán)力建構(gòu)[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2016年06期

3 楊瑾輝;;試述檔案行政權(quán)力清單與檔案行政責(zé)任清單[J];檔案管理;2016年05期

4 宋飛;;論檔案行政權(quán)力清單的行政法屬性[J];檔案管理;2016年05期

5 徐丹丹;于元元;;信息技術(shù)對檔案身份認(rèn)同的影響研究[J];檔案與建設(shè);2016年07期

6 唐一芝;;社會治理視域下多元檔案管理權(quán)力主體的功能定位新探[J];檔案管理;2016年04期

7 陳建;;權(quán)力建構(gòu)視野下檔案工作流程的階段審視與反思[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2016年02期

8 劉迪;;檔案建構(gòu)社會記憶中的權(quán)力因素及其積極作用——從南京大屠殺檔案申遺說起[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2016年02期

9 劉東斌;;部分省份省級檔案行政權(quán)力清單實證分析[J];檔案管理;2015年06期

10 吳雁平;;論建立和推行檔案行政權(quán)力清單制度[J];檔案管理;2015年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張潔;檔案工作者身份認(rèn)同研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：2087697