發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-19 18:40

  本文選題：科學(xué)網(wǎng) + 圖書情報(bào)領(lǐng)域　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,博客在國內(nèi)外取得了巨大的發(fā)展,無論是在學(xué)術(shù)界還是網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū),越來越多的人選擇利用博客來發(fā)表自己對(duì)于學(xué)術(shù)方面或其他領(lǐng)域的見解。博主通過撰寫博客一方面增加了與學(xué)術(shù)界同行交流的機(jī)會(huì),另一方面也提高了在學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域的知名度。關(guān)于博主及博客的影響力問題有相當(dāng)多人對(duì)此進(jìn)行了研究,主要是關(guān)于如何選取博主影響力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)以及采用社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法分析博客在學(xué)術(shù)交流中的作用。分析某一領(lǐng)域的博主通過撰寫博客所產(chǎn)生的學(xué)術(shù)影響力的研究還比較少,本文建立了一個(gè)科學(xué)網(wǎng)圖書情報(bào)領(lǐng)域博主的影響力評(píng)價(jià)模型,并結(jié)合引文分析法驗(yàn)證評(píng)價(jià)模型的合理性與準(zhǔn)確性,希望能夠?yàn)樵u(píng)價(jià)科學(xué)博客的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值提供一種思路,同時(shí)也豐富學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)的相關(guān)方法。本文共分為五部分。第一部分:緒論。主要介紹選題背景、研究意義以及博客影響力、學(xué)者影響力的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,闡述論文的研究思路、研究方法以及主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第二部分:博主學(xué)術(shù)影響力評(píng)價(jià)模型。包括學(xué)術(shù)影響力的概念及六種評(píng)價(jià)方法,在現(xiàn)有的學(xué)者影響力的評(píng)價(jià)方法基礎(chǔ)上,利用Altmetrics的思想構(gòu)建一個(gè)新的博主影響力評(píng)價(jià)模型并對(duì)科學(xué)網(wǎng)圖書情報(bào)學(xué)科領(lǐng)域的博主進(jìn)行影響力測(cè)評(píng)。采集博主發(fā)表博文的訪問量、博文數(shù)量、好友數(shù)量等指標(biāo),并具體闡述選取這些指標(biāo)的原因以及必要性、可行性,對(duì)關(guān)鍵性指標(biāo)做出分析。通過綜合分析博主的積極性、博文質(zhì)量、傳播覆蓋度,按照建立的評(píng)價(jià)模型來為博主打分,評(píng)價(jià)博主影響力。第三部分:評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果分析及驗(yàn)證。利用引文分析法分析博主影響力覆蓋的范圍及影響力深度,同時(shí)驗(yàn)證第二部分所建立的評(píng)價(jià)模型的合理性與準(zhǔn)確性。第四部分:問題與建議�？偨Y(jié)出科學(xué)網(wǎng)博客目前存在的不利于博主影響力擴(kuò)大的問題并給出相應(yīng)的建議。第五部分:結(jié)論。對(duì)本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容做出總結(jié),同時(shí)對(duì)研究中的不足之處進(jìn)行闡述。
[Abstract]:In recent years, blog has made great progress at home and abroad. Whether in academic or online community, more and more people choose to use blog to express their opinions on academic or other fields. Bloggers have increased their opportunities to communicate with their academic peers by writing blogs, as well as by increasing their visibility in the academic field. There are many researches on the influence of bloggers and blogs, mainly on how to select the evaluation index of bloggers' influence and how to analyze the role of blog in academic communication by using social network analysis method. There are few studies on the academic influence of bloggers in a certain field. This paper establishes a model for evaluating the influence of bloggers in the field of science, library and information. Combining with the citation analysis to verify the rationality and accuracy of the evaluation model, it is hoped that it can provide a way of thinking for evaluating the academic value of scientific blog and enrich the relevant methods of academic evaluation. This paper is divided into five parts. Part one: introduction. This paper mainly introduces the background, significance and influence of blog, the status quo of domestic and foreign research on the influence of scholars, expounds the research ideas, research methods and main innovation points of the thesis. The second part: the evaluation model of bloggers' academic influence. Including the concept of academic influence and six evaluation methods, on the basis of the existing methods of evaluation of the impact of scholars, This paper constructs a new model for evaluating the influence of bloggers by using the idea of Altmetrics, and evaluates the influence of bloggers in the field of science, library and information. Collect the number of visitors, blog posts, friends and other indicators, and specifically explain the reasons for the selection of these indicators and the necessity, feasibility, to make an analysis of the key indicators. Through the comprehensive analysis of the enthusiasm of bloggers, the quality of blog posts, the degree of dissemination coverage, according to the established evaluation model to score bloggers and evaluate the influence of bloggers. The third part: analysis and verification of evaluation results. The scope and depth of influence coverage of bloggers are analyzed by citation analysis, and the rationality and accuracy of the evaluation model established in the second part are verified. Part four: problems and suggestions. This paper summarizes the existing problems of ScienceNet blog which are not conducive to the expansion of bloggers' influence and gives corresponding suggestions. Part V: conclusion. The research content of this paper is summarized, and the shortcomings of the research are expounded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G353.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 鄭繼來;謝龍;;編輯推薦對(duì)博文影響力的擴(kuò)大效應(yīng)——以科學(xué)網(wǎng)博客社區(qū)為例[J];新世紀(jì)圖書館;2013年06期

2 徐孝娟;趙宇翔;朱慶華;;民族志決策樹方法在學(xué)術(shù)博客用戶行為中的研究——以科學(xué)網(wǎng)博客為例[J];現(xiàn)代圖書情報(bào)技術(shù);2014年01期

3 周春雷;朱向林;;科學(xué)網(wǎng)圖情博客發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀研究[J];圖書情報(bào)知識(shí);2013年05期

4 李春秋;李晨英;韓明杰;段文凱;;科學(xué)網(wǎng)博文中的學(xué)術(shù)信息資源交流現(xiàn)狀分析[J];圖書館論壇;2012年02期

5 周春雷;;鏈接內(nèi)容分析視角下的科學(xué)網(wǎng)博客評(píng)價(jià)探索[J];圖書情報(bào)知識(shí);2012年04期

6 楊瑞敏;蔣靜;張燦;孫杰;;科學(xué)網(wǎng)關(guān)中遠(yuǎn)程計(jì)算服務(wù)機(jī)制的研究[J];青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曹沖;科學(xué)網(wǎng)圖情博主學(xué)術(shù)影響力分析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 陳曼瓊;科學(xué)網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)基因新聞框架研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2015年

3 賀靚;科學(xué)網(wǎng)博客研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1774252